Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 11 Mar 2021

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Rob Hackfath (lead), Claire Jones

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Claire Jones, Rob Hackfath

  • Postcode verified

    B24 0JP

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+9Mostly positivemore positive than 29% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisesecure knowledgeskilledknowledgeablesupportiveconsistentaccurate
Criticismat risklimitedslowabsence

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings991w+14
  • What needs to improve194w−20

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,171
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 54, typical 45
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
8
typical 5
Hedged sentences
10%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 82%What needs to improve 16%About the inspection 2%

Full report text

Victoria Nussey Headteacher Paget Primary School Paget Road Birmingham West Midlands B24 0JP

p.1

Additional, remote monitoring inspection of Paget Primary School

Following my remote inspection with Rob Hackfath, Her Majesty’s Inspector (HMI), of your school on 27 and 28 January 2021, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions that have been taken to provide education to all pupils during the current circumstances.

p.1

Additional, remote monitoring inspection of Paget Primary School

This monitoring inspection was conducted under section 8 (2) of the Education Act 2005 (as amended) and in accordance with Ofsted’s published procedures for visiting schools while routine inspections remain temporarily suspended. It was additional to the usual monitoring process for schools that are judged to require improvement.

p.1

Additional, remote monitoring inspection of Paget Primary School

Following changes to government guidance and the imposition of COVID-19 (coronavirus) lockdown restrictions, this monitoring inspection was carried out remotely. As such, the range of evidence available to inspectors was narrower than would normally be the case during an on-site inspection. As a result, this letter provides a more limited level of assurance than our usual monitoring reports.

p.1

Additional, remote monitoring inspection of Paget Primary School

The inspection took place because the school has received two successive judgements of requires improvement. The school’s most recent section 5 inspection took place in November 2019.

p.1

Additional, remote monitoring inspection of Paget Primary School

Having considered all the evidence and taking into account the impact of COVID-19 on the school, I am of the opinion that at this time:

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

to provide education in the current circumstances. Ofsted

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted Leaders and those responsible for governance should take further action to:

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

 ensure that the weakest readers receive the support they need to catch up quickly.

p.2

Context

 Since the previous inspection, two leadership posts have been covered temporarily due to planned staff absence. Leadership roles have been reviewed to sharpen the focus on the curriculum. One new governor has joined the governing body.

p.2

Context

 During autumn 2020, approximately two thirds of pupils experienced at least one period of remote education because of COVID-19. This included one class of Year 2 pupils and all pupils in the school’s resource base.

p.2

Context

 At the time of this inspection, the school was only open to vulnerable pupils and the children of key workers. Approximately one quarter of pupils were attending school. Three quarters of pupils were learning remotely. Approximately two thirds of vulnerable pupils are being educated on site. Approximately one third of pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) are attending school.

p.2

Context

 At the time of this inspection, no teaching staff were absent due to COVID-19.

p.2

Main findings

 You have ensured that all pupils can receive an education during this time of national lockdown. Where necessary, you have provided pupils with the technology they need to take part in online learning at home. Even so, some pupils were slow to engage. You and the pastoral team have been swift to address this. As a result, the number of pupils accessing education is rising rapidly.

p.2

Main findings

 Before the partial closure of schools in March 2020, you had started to review the curriculum. Subject leaders are continuing this work. Curriculum plans now identify the knowledge and skills leaders want pupils to learn. In some subjects, plans break learning down into small steps. For example, in mathematics and personal, social and health education. This is making it easier for teachers to adapt planning in the current circumstances. In some other subjects and in the early years, plans are less well developed.

p.2

Main findings

 There is now a consistent approach to the teaching of phonics. Staff know the order in which to teach sounds. You are ensuring that pupils in the early years, key stage 1 and Year 3 have access to direct instruction every day. Teaching matches the sounds pupils know. However, the weakest readers do not get the extra practise they need to catch up quickly. This includes pupils in school and those working remotely. Furthermore, older pupils who are in the early stages of learning to read are not receiving the direct instruction or practise they need. These pupils are at risk of falling further behind.

p.2

Main findings

 In most subjects, pupils working at home and school study the same content. You are adapting the curriculum to make this possible. For example, in English, pupils are studying writing genres in a different order to previous years. In physical education, the planned curriculum is on pause. Instead, pupils are taking part in challenges to promote their physical health. In these subjects, teachers continue to teach content in a logical sequence.

p.3

Main findings

 Teachers timetable lessons so that pupils in each year group access ‘live’ teaching at different times. They set ‘assignments’ for pupils to complete independently. Some of these tasks enable pupils to build their knowledge step by step. However, others are too open ended, which results in less- purposeful learning. Teachers expect the same standard of work from pupils working at home and school. They are starting to make checks on how well pupils are learning remotely.

p.3

Main findings

 The special educational needs coordinator (SENCo) has a secure knowledge of pupils with high-level needs. Skilled staff are ensuring that pupils in the resource base continue to learn. A large proportion of other pupils with SEND are working remotely, and a small number are not accessing education at all. These pupils need more support with their learning.

p.3

Main findings

 Governors have an accurate understanding of what the school does well and what needs to improve. They have changed the way in which they work to focus on the school’s current priorities. Governors are knowledgeable about the education that pupils are receiving. This is because you keep them up to date with detailed information. Governors are supportive of your drive to put pupils’ emotional and mental health needs at the heart of the school’s work.

p.3

Main findings

 A school improvement partner meets with you and senior leaders each half term. They check on the actions you are taking and the difference these are making. This helps you to prioritise. Some subject leaders have received support to develop their leadership skills. As a result, these leaders are better able to make checks on curriculum planning and delivery. Aspects of planned work are on hold due to COVID-19 restrictions. This has slowed some improvements, for example in the early years.

p.3

Evidence

This inspection was conducted remotely. We held meetings with the headteacher, the deputy headteacher and other leaders to discuss leaders’ actions to provide education to all pupils during a national lockdown. These meetings involved the curriculum leader, early years leader, reading leader, SENCo and five subject leaders. We held discussions with the chair of the governing body and three governors, as well as two representatives of the local authority. We also met with a group of pupils and a group of staff. We listened to a small number of pupils read to a familiar adult. We also spoke with the pastoral support team. We examined the school’s curriculum plans and reviewed some examples of remote education.

p.3

Evidence

I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Birmingham local authority. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion