Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected —

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Shazia Akram (lead), Lucy English

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Lucy English, Shazia Akram

  • Postcode verified

    RG24 9PT

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+8Mostly positivemore positive than 29% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectiveconfidentsuccessfullyaccurately
Criticismseriousweaknesseslimited

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings926w+8
  • What needs to improve170w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
1,080
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 53, typical 45
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
8
typical 5
Hedged sentences
3%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 82%What needs to improve 15%About the inspection 3%

Full report text

Tijhs Jordan Acting Headteacher Marnel Junior School Shetland Road Popley Way Basingstoke Hampshire RG24 9PT

p.1

Additional, remote monitoring inspection of Marnel Junior School

Following my remote inspection with Shazia Akram, Her Majesty’s Inspector (HMI), of your school on 3 and 4 February 2021, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions that have been taken to provide education to all pupils during the current circumstances.

p.1

Additional, remote monitoring inspection of Marnel Junior School

This monitoring inspection was conducted under section 8 (2) of the Education Act 2005 (as amended) and in accordance with Ofsted’s published procedures for visiting schools while routine inspections remain temporarily suspended. It was additional to the usual monitoring process for schools that are judged to have serious weaknesses.

p.1

Additional, remote monitoring inspection of Marnel Junior School

Following changes to government guidance and the imposition of COVID-19 (coronavirus) lockdown restrictions, this monitoring inspection was carried out remotely. As such, the range of evidence available to inspectors was narrower than would normally be the case during an on-site inspection. As a result, this letter provides a more limited level of assurance than our usual monitoring reports.

p.1

Additional, remote monitoring inspection of Marnel Junior School

The inspection took place because the school was judged to have serious weaknesses at its previous section 5 inspection. The school’s most recent section 5 inspection took place in February 2020.

p.1

Additional, remote monitoring inspection of Marnel Junior School

Having considered all the evidence and taking into account the impact of COVID-19 on the school, I am of the opinion that at this time:

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

to provide education in the current circumstances. Ofsted

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Context

 Since the last inspection in February 2020, there have been several changes in staffing and governance. There is a new special educational needs coordinator (SENCo). Several governors have changed and there is a new chair of the governing body. The school is due to join the Bourne Education Trust (BET) in April 2021.

p.2

Context

 During autumn term 2020, a small proportion of pupils had to work from home for short periods. Some pupils in Years 3 and 6 had more than one period of self-isolation.

p.2

Context

 In the week before this inspection, just under a fifth of pupils attended school on site, a proportion that has been increasing weekly. This includes approximately two thirds of vulnerable pupils and one third of pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND).

p.2

Context

 A small number of staff are working from home as they have to shield. Their in-school duties are covered by colleagues.

p.2

Main findings

 Leaders and governors have ensured that all pupils continue with their learning in all subjects during the current circumstances. Staff know pupils and their families really well. Staff have kept in close contact and provided families with technology to make sure that all pupils are able to access the lessons and resources while working from home. However, until very recently, leaders have focused on pupils’ engagement with learning rather than checking how well pupils know and understand what they have been taught.

p.2

Main findings

 Before the partial closure of schools in March 2020, leaders redesigned the subject plans for reading and mathematics. Over the next few months, leaders worked with the local authority to review planning in other subjects. This made it easier for leaders to adapt lessons and move to remote education. Leaders have changed the order of some activities in music, design and technology and art, so that pupils will be taught aspects that need specialist equipment when they all return to school.

p.2

Main findings

 Teachers provide live online lessons for each year group. The vulnerable pupils and children of key workers who are in school access the same virtual lessons and materials as those pupils who are working from home. Leaders are in the process of refining this approach so that fewer pupils are in each video call. The intention is that this will help the teachers to know more accurately how well pupils are learning during each lesson.

p.2

Main findings

 Leaders have prioritised the teaching of reading and phonics. All teachers and learning support assistants are now trained to teach phonics. Staff record phonics lessons and provide effective support for pupils who need help to catch up. Reading lessons have been adapted well for remote learning. All pupils have digital reading books that are matched carefully to their reading stage. Staff listen to the weakest readers weekly. Other pupils record themselves reading and upload the files for their teachers. Leaders recognise this is onerous and are considering ways to improve this process.  The SENCo has made well-considered use of the advice from the local special school. She has made sure that staff know how to help pupils with SEND to meet their personal learning targets as well as to develop their subject knowledge. Learning support assistants help teachers to adapt lessons to meet the needs of these pupils. The SENCo has encouraged pupils with SEND

p.2

Main findings

to attend on site. Where this is not possible, staff have worked closely with parents to make sure that they are confident to oversee the tasks that their children are set.  Governors have benefited from training and support from the local authority. They adapted quickly to working remotely and continued their scrutiny of leaders’ work. This has helped them to successfully hold leaders to account for decisions and to ensure that all pupils receive an education during the current circumstances.  Hampshire local authority and BET multi-academy trust have provided effective support and challenge. They have helped leaders to improve provision and deal with the current circumstances. The local authority’s work has included support for curriculum planning and SEND provision. These aspects now appear stronger than as described in the previous inspection report. The BET trust has supported school leadership and built partnerships

p.3

Main findings

with other local schools. This has strengthened subject leadership, particularly in English and mathematics. The trust has also reviewed the quality of remote learning for all pupils. Leaders know there is more work to be done to improve this.

p.3

Evidence

This inspection was conducted remotely. We held meetings with the headteacher, other senior leaders, pupils, staff, the chair of the governing body, a representative of the local authority and a representative from BET multi-academy trust to discuss leaders’ actions to provide education to all pupils during a national lockdown.

p.3

Evidence

We listened to pupils read, looked at curriculum plans, lesson resources and pupils’ work. We also took account of the 50 responses by parents to Ofsted’s Parent View, including 22 written responses, and the 30 staff responses to Ofsted’s online staff survey. I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Hampshire. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion