Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected —

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Shaun Jarvis (lead), Daniel Lambert

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Daniel Lambert, Shaun Jarvis

  • Postcode verified

    MK11 1EF

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−27Mixedmore positive than 12% of reports of this type

Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

Praisesuccessfullyclearswiftlyaccuratelyimprovingaccurate
Criticismlimitednot yetnot alwaysgapsabsencenot precisely

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings1011w−24
  • What needs to improve151w−20

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,149
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 47, typical 45
Average sentence
20 words
Next steps
8
typical 5
Hedged sentences
9%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 85%What needs to improve 13%About the inspection 3%

Full report text

Kate Holland Headteacher St Mary and St Giles Church of England School King George Crescent Stony Stratford Milton Keynes Buckinghamshire MK11 1EF

p.1

Additional, remote monitoring inspection of St Mary and St Giles Church of

Following my remote inspection Shaun Jarvis, Her Majesty's Inspector (HMI), of your school on 3 and 4 February 2021, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions that have been taken to provide education to all pupils during the current circumstances.

p.1

Additional, remote monitoring inspection of St Mary and St Giles Church of

This monitoring inspection was conducted under section 8 (2) of the Education Act 2005 (as amended) and in accordance with Ofsted's published procedures for visiting schools while routine inspections remain temporarily suspended. It was additional to the usual monitoring process for schools that are judged to require special measures.

p.1

Additional, remote monitoring inspection of St Mary and St Giles Church of

Following changes to government guidance and the imposition of COVID-19 (coronavirus) lockdown restrictions, this monitoring inspection was carried out remotely. As such, the range of evidence available to inspectors was narrower than would normally be the case during an on-site inspection. As a result, this letter provides a more limited level of assurance than our usual monitoring reports.

p.1

Additional, remote monitoring inspection of St Mary and St Giles Church of

The inspection took place because the school was judged to require special measures at its previous section 5 inspection. The school’s most recent section 5 inspection took place in February 2019.

p.1

Additional, remote monitoring inspection of St Mary and St Giles Church of

Having considered all the evidence and taking into account the impact of COVID-19 on the school, I am of the opinion that at this time:

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

to provide education in the current circumstances. Ofsted

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Context

 Since the previous monitoring inspection in June 2019, a new headteacher, five senior leaders and five teachers have joined the school. Six new governors have also started. The school is due to join the Inspiring Futures Through Learning multi-academy trust.

p.2

Context

 During the autumn term, around two thirds of pupils were educated remotely for a period of time due to outbreaks of COVID-19 in Years 4 and 6.

p.2

Context

 At the time of this inspection, around two thirds of pupils were being educated remotely. Most pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) were attending school full time. Three quarters of pupils who are considered vulnerable were also attending the school.

p.2

Context

 Leaders were not dealing with any significant levels of staff absence due to COVID-19 at the time of this inspection.

p.2

Main findings

 When the school partially closed in January, leaders acted quickly to provide remote teaching for those not attending school. Clear communication with families meant that laptops were provided to pupils who needed them to access their learning. Pupils who became vulnerable or struggled to complete the work remotely were swiftly invited into school so they could get the right support to continue their education.

p.2

Main findings

 Pupils at home and in school study the same content, often joining each other for online lessons. In most subjects, staff follow the intended curriculum. Pupils download their work and submit it online for their teachers to check. Some lessons have been adapted, such as physical education (PE) and music, so that pupils at home do not require specialist equipment to complete their tasks.

p.2

Main findings

 Prior to March 2020, leaders had focused on addressing significant gaps in pupils’ English and mathematics knowledge. Staff had received useful training to help them provide this support for pupils and to deliver the newly designed curriculum in these subjects. Staff have successfully adapted the English and mathematics curriculum for online teaching because they have assessed pupils accurately and use this information to build on pupils’ prior knowledge.

p.2

Main findings

 Leaders used time over the summer term 2020 to review and redesign the remaining areas of the curriculum. Plans now match the requirements of the national curriculum more closely and staff are quickly getting to grips with the new content they need to teach. For instance, staff have been trained in the new computing curriculum, which helps pupils to develop an increasingly sophisticated understanding of online safety and coding. However, this work is at an early stage in history and geography. The subject leaders have not yet received the training they need to review, improve and support others in delivering these subjects.

p.2

Main findings

 All pupils in Reception and key stage 1 receive daily phonics teaching and those in school read to an adult every day. Initially, pupils working remotely were unable to practise reading because they had limited access to the right books. Leaders have now provided online reading resources that pupils can access easily at home. Staff check that younger pupils’ reading is improving through listening to them during weekly phone calls home. Older pupils continue to read texts remotely through online books and listen to recorded stories read by their teachers. However, leaders have not yet precisely set out what texts pupils will read and when during their time in school. This means that pupils do not always broaden their knowledge of writing styles.

p.3

Main findings

 The majority of pupils with SEND are attending the school. These pupils work with staff who know them well and set tasks that help these pupils to meet their targets. Close links between support staff, the pupil welfare team and families ensure that vulnerable pupils and those with SEND get additional support when they need it, whether in school or working remotely.

p.3

Main findings

 Governors have worked hard to ensure that the school continues to provide education during this period. The new governors have provided additional expertise and experience. This has helped the governing body to check that the school provides places for vulnerable and keyworker children that need them and that remote education is accessible for others. This added capacity has also allowed other members of the governing body to maintain their focus on the school’s imminent move to academy status.

p.3

Main findings

 The school has received significant support from the Inspiring Futures Through Learning multi-academy trust. Training has enabled staff to improve the curriculum and provided support so they can deliver this online. The local authority and diocese continue to provide accurate and evaluative reports to governors which help them to check that leaders’ actions are having the intended effect.

p.3

Evidence

This inspection was conducted remotely. Inspectors held meetings with the headteacher, five senior leaders, three members of staff and four governors, including the chair, to discuss leaders’ actions to provide education to all pupils during a national lockdown. Inspectors met with officers from the local authority and the Inspiring Futures Through Learning multi-academy trust to evaluate the external support provided to the school.

p.3

Evidence

Inspectors also examined the school’s curriculum plans and viewed some samples of learning that is being provided remotely. Inspectors took into account the views of 87 parents and 39 staff through the Ofsted online surveys. They talked to pupils in key stages 1 and 2 about their current experiences in school.

p.3

Evidence

I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the director of education for the Diocese of Oxford, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Milton Keynes. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion