Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Stoke-on-Trent College

Inspected — · published 18 Jan 2021 · URN 130815

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Bev Ramsell

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Bev Ramsell

  • Postcode verified

    ST4 2DG

  • Name on report verified

    Stoke-on-Trent College

  • URN verified

    130815

Page 1 of 5
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−20Mixedmore positive than 15% of reports of this type

Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

Criticismbelow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspection positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No next steps set out.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
5
Words of findings
157
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 39, typical 45
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
0
typical 5
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 12%About the inspection 88%

Full report text

Stoke-on-Trent College Interim visit report

p.1

Name of lead inspector: Bev Ramsell, HMI

p.1

Type of provider: General further education college

p.1

Address: Cauldon Campus Stoke Road Shelton Stoke-on-Trent Staffordshire ST4 2DG Interim visit: Stoke-on-Trent College, 25–26 November 2020

p.1

Context and focus of visit

On 17 March 2020, all routine inspections were suspended due to the COVID-19 (coronavirus) pandemic. As part of our phased return to routine inspections, we are carrying out ‘ interim visits ’ to further education and skills providers. Interim visits are to help learners, parents, employers and government understand how providers are meeting the needs of learners in this period, including those with high needs and those with special educational needs and/or disabilities.

p.2

Context and focus of visit

The focus of these visits is on the themes set out below and the findings are based on discussions with leaders, managers, staff and learners.

p.2

Context and focus of visit

Following changes to government guidance and the imposition of COVID-19 lockdown restrictions, we made this visit remotely to reduce pressure on the provider.

p.2

Information about the provider

Stoke-on-Trent College is a medium-sized general further education college based across two campuses: Cauldon campus and Burslem campus. At the time of the visit 1,446 learners were on education programmes for young people, 2,286 learners were on adult learning programmes, 552 apprentices were following apprenticeship frameworks and standards-based programmes, and 52 learners were in receipt of high-needs funding. Leaders offer courses in most subject areas. Courses are offered from level 1 to level 4, with most learners on study programmes at level 3 and below. Nearly half of all adults are studying at or below level 1. Most apprentices are on level 2 and level 3 apprenticeships. The college works with two subcontractors, one for the teaching of performing arts qualifications and the other engineering-based qualifications.

p.2

stakeholders and adapts to changed circumstances?

Leaders and managers described how they prioritised learners’ return to college and the processes involved, to ensure that the college was COVID-19 safe. They explained how they created a COVID-19 working group, which consisted of managers and staff from across the college. Through this group, they identified the most vulnerable learners and learners who needed to complete practical assessment to return first, such as level 3 learners studying hairdressing. They explained the implementation of the safety measures, and the recruitment of additional security staff, to make sure everyone complied with the procedures. Interim visit: Stoke-on-Trent College, 25–26 November 2020 Managers discussed the range of activities used to support learners with careers information, advice and guidance (CIAG). These included virtual visits from industrial experts, face-to-face visits from partner universities, and one-to-one sessions with

p.2

stakeholders and adapts to changed circumstances?

college career advisors and teachers. However, leaders shared concerns with access to CIAG for current Year 11 students. Due to COVID-19 restrictions, all CIAG for this year group is virtual. Only 60% of households in Stoke-on-Trent have broadband. As a result, some students may not be able to access the information they need, to make an informed choice for their next steps in September 2021.

p.3

stakeholders and adapts to changed circumstances?

Leaders report a flexible approach to support staff working at home. They have set expectations for staff to take regular breaks and have accepted irregular hours of work to help staff to meet family obligations. They told inspectors how they have developed a culture of well-being and reassurance through regular communications and support meetings with staff. Leaders have seen a reduction in staff sickness, which they believe is a result of these interventions.

p.3

stakeholders and adapts to changed circumstances?

Stakeholders explained the move to online learning and the flexible approach the college took to enable apprentices to continue with their studies. They spoke about the creative ways tutors taught online to make sure learners stayed engaged. They discussed weekly meetings that are used to review learning and matters such as health and well-being.

p.3

the reasonable needs of learners?

Teachers discussed how they established learners’ starting points. They explained how they reviewed learners’ knowledge and skills through activities such as quizzes, interviews with teachers, and observations of learners’ practical work. They told inspectors how they had introduced an assessment of learners’ mental health, which has helped them to understand learners’ full support needs. They described the additional one-to-one help that learners received to enable them to catch up.

p.3

the reasonable needs of learners?

Managers and teachers explained a number of ways in which they check the quality of teaching and learning. These include reviewing schemes of work to look at the order of teaching, observing teaching sessions virtually and physically, and the monitoring of learners’ progress through tracking systems. They explained how the sequencing of the curriculum had changed. For example, in hospitality practical assessments had been brought forward, and in public services they had been put to the end of the academic year to allow teachers to focus on theoretical knowledge.

p.3

the reasonable needs of learners?

Teachers explained how they stayed in touch with the most vulnerable learners. They described regular phone calls and contact from mentors, which sometimes involved parents. They told inspectors how learners were invited to twice-weekly ‘tea and chat’ sessions, which were run by college counsellors. Interim visit: Stoke-on-Trent College, 25–26 November 2020 Teachers identified the lack of access to digital technologies as one of the main barriers to learning online. They said that during enrolment they ask what equipment learners have access to at home. Where necessary learners are then supported with laptops and Wi-Fi dongles, for example. Where they identify issues with digital literacy, learners gain priority access to the learning resources centre, which has remained open throughout the pandemic.

p.3

the reasonable needs of learners?

Managers stated that attendance to classes had either stayed the same or, in some areas, they had seen an improvement. They said learners had missed the social interaction and were keen to be back in college.

p.4

potential risks, including from online sources?

Learners explained that, prior to returning to campus, they were sent information and reviewed virtual site tours. They stated that this was reinforced by discussions with tutors, where they explained the use of masks in public areas, hand sanitisation points, one-way systems, and details of cleaning for desks and keyboards in classrooms. They identified who they would talk to, should they need to, and particularly highlighted the roles of peer mentors and the student council in supporting them .

p.4

potential risks, including from online sources?

Leaders discussed the staff training that had taken place in areas such as: ‘Keeping Children Safe in Education’, developing strategies to ensure that teachers teach safely online, and a general safeguarding module that is changed to meet the current needs of the college.

p.4

potential risks, including from online sources?

Leaders explained how they maintained the college safeguarding and support processes throughout the national restrictions. They discussed how an already established online process for referrals was used and how safeguarding officers remained available to learners. Interim visit: Stoke-on-Trent College, 25–26 November 2020 regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.4

potential risks, including from online sources?

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.5

potential risks, including from online sources?

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.5

potential risks, including from online sources?

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.5

potential risks, including from online sources?

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.5

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion