Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Social care · Social care monitoring visit

Children's Home run by Sandcastle Care Limited in Lancashire

Inspected 25 Nov 2020 · published 12 Jan 2021 · URN 1271375

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Natalie Bennett (lead), Mike Charnley

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Group verified

    Sandcastle Care Ltd

  • Inspection date verified

    25 Nov 2020

  • Inspectors verified

    Mike Charnley, Natalie Bennett

  • Name on report verified

    1271375

  • URN verified

    1271375

Page 1 of 6
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−68Very criticalmore positive than 9% of reports of this type

Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

Praiseeffectivelysecure
Criticisminadequateat riskseriousconcernsharmpersistently absent

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings20w0
  • What needs to improve218w−68

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
6
Words of findings
238
shorter than usual (typical 566)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 52, typical 46
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
2
typical 5
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 2%What needs to improve 17%About the inspection 82%

Full report text

Inspection report for children's home - monitoring visit: 1271375 1

p.1

Sandcastle Care Ltd

Monitoring visit Inspected under the social care common inspection framework

p.1

Information about this children’s home

This is a private children’s home that is registered for up to three children or young people who may have behavioural and/or emotional difficulties.

p.1

Information about this children’s home

The home is currently overseen by a manager who has been registered since April 2020.

p.1

This monitoring visit

During an assurance visit on 8 October 2020 inspectors identified serious and widespread concerns. These were in relation to leadership and management and the protection of children. As such, two compliance notices were issued. These were specifically in relation to:

p.1

This monitoring visit

 Failures to recognise and report allegations of abuse made by young people.  The length and frequency of missing-from-home incidents and the response of leaders and managers to these.  Staff’s lack of knowledge and skills, particularly in relation to substance misuse and safeguarding processes.  A lack of documented protocols and strategies to manage behaviours of concern.  Risk assessments did not include locations of significant concern.  Ineffective monitoring and review of serious incidents in the home.  Insufficient action taken to address shortfalls raised by the regulator at previous visits.

p.1

This monitoring visit

To evaluate the progress a monitoring visit was completed. This was completed both on and off site. Inspectors were also able to assess progress made with some of the requirements issued at the assurance visit. These findings are reflected within this report. Inspection report for children's home - monitoring visit: 1271375 2 One young person currently lives in this home. She continues to thrive and receives individualised support from a staff team who know her well. Another young person has been discharged from the home. This was due to an increase in missing-from- home episodes and escalating concerns for this young person’s safety.

p.1

This monitoring visit

Since the assurance visit, leaders and managers have taken appropriate action to respond to allegations of abuse. Incidents are shared and escalated in line with policies and procedures. They are communicated to the regulator and have received independent review from the designated officer. This promotes young people’s safety and well-being.

p.2

This monitoring visit

Training has been refreshed in key areas. Staff have revisited safeguarding, managing allegations, reporting and recording and whistle-blowing. Policies and procedures which relate to the protection of children are also discussed within team meetings. Staff are aware of these procedures and know how to put them into practice. Unfortunately, night staff have not been able to attend these meetings. The manager has plans to test the knowledge and understanding of these team members through supervision.

p.2

This monitoring visit

Staff have received substance misuse training online. To strengthen staff’s knowledge, the manager has sourced more specific information from external agencies. For example, staff have a good understanding of the concepts of addiction and dependence. They are also able to respond to potential emergencies involving substance misuse. This means that young people receive support from staff who have the skills to manage their individual needs and risk-taking behaviours.

p.2

This monitoring visit

Support plans in place to respond to young people’s risk-taking behaviours are up to date and include clear strategies. Staff are familiar with the protocols in place and can provide an agreed and consistent response to young people’s behaviours.

p.2

This monitoring visit

Location risk assessments are comprehensive. Staff are familiar with areas of concern and these are highlighted within documentation. The manager has been proactive in seeking specific local area information. She has relayed this to young people and the staff team. As a result, young people are more aware of the risks presented by the community and this helps them to remain safe when out alone.

p.2

This monitoring visit

The registered manager has improved the monitoring and review systems in the home. Weekly management checks have been introduced. These encourage timely oversight of serious incidents and shortfalls identified within the home. Furthermore, the manager has introduced ‘reflection time’. This allows staff to reflect on incidents that have occurred, their practice and the young people’s thoughts and feelings. Reflection sessions have improved the quality of care afforded to young people by considering their individual needs and promoting more child-friendly practice.

p.2

This monitoring visit

The responsible individual has increased his presence in the home. He has provided guidance to staff in relation to the home’s electronic reporting system. This has Inspection report for children's home - monitoring visit: 1271375 3 improved staff’s capabilities in reporting and recording. When used correctly, the system ensures accountability and oversight from senior leaders. This further strengthens monitoring and review and ensures the escalation of serious incidents.

p.2

This monitoring visit

The requirements made at the last inspection around care planning and restraint were not addressed at this monitoring visit. Therefore, they are carried over until the home has its next full inspection in line with the social care common inspection framework (SCCIF).

p.3

Recent inspection history

Inspection date Inspection type Inspection judgement 10/03/2020 Full Requires improvement to be good 21/02/2019 Interim Sustained effectiveness 03/10/2018 Full Good Inspection report for children's home - monitoring visit: 1271375 4

p.3

Statutory requirements

This section sets out the actions that the registered person(s) must take to meet the Care Standards Act 2000, Children’s Homes (England) Regulations 2015 and the ‘Guide to the children’s homes regulations including the quality standards’. The registered person(s) must comply within the given timescales.

p.4

Requirement Due date

The care planning standard is that children— receive effectively planned care in or through the children’s home.

p.4

Requirement Due date

In particular, the standard in paragraph (1) requires the registered person to ensure—

p.4

Requirement Due date

that the child’s placing authority is contacted, and a review of that child’s relevant plans is requested, if—

p.4

Requirement Due date

the registered person considers that the child is at risk of harm or has concerns that the care provided for the child is inadequate to meet the child’s needs;

p.4

Requirement Due date

the child is, or has been, persistently absent from the home without permission. (Regulation 14 (1)(a) (2)(e)(i)(ii)) 20 January 2021

p.4

Requirement Due date

Restraint in relation to a child is only permitted for the purpose of preventing—

p.4

Requirement Due date

injury to any person (including the child); serious damage to the property of any person (including the child); or

p.4

Requirement Due date

a child who is accommodated in a secure children’s home from absconding from the home.

p.4

Requirement Due date

Restraint in relation to a child must be necessary and proportionate. (Regulation 20 (1)(a)(b)(c) (2)) 20 January 2021 Inspection report for children's home - monitoring visit: 1271375 5

p.4

Information about this inspection

The purpose of this visit was to monitor the action taken and the progress made by the children’s home since its last Ofsted inspection.

p.5

Information about this inspection

This inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000.

p.5

Children’s home details

Registered provider: Sandcastle Care Ltd

p.5

Children’s home details

Registered provider address: 49 Whitegate Drive, Blackpool FY3 9DG

p.5

Inspectors

Natalie Bennett, Social Care Inspector Mike Charnley, Social Care Inspector Inspection report for children's home - monitoring visit: 1271375 6 to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.5

Inspectors

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.6

Inspectors

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.6

Inspectors

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.6

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion