Early years · Early years complaint outcome
DCLM Community Project
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
4 Jan 2021
- URN verified
EY245107
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 2
- Words of findings
- 363
- longer than usual (typical 281)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 48, typical 42
- Average sentence
- 17 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 1
- Hedged sentences
- 5%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Summary of outcome
Her Majesty's Chief Inspector of Education, Children's Services and Skills is leading Ofsted's work into how regulated early years and childcare providers in England have delivered child- centred practice and care within the context of the restrictions placed on society during the COVID-19 (coronavirus) pandemic.
p.1
Summary of outcome
All early years providers must meet the legal requirements in the Statutory framework for the early years foundation stage. If we find that a provider is not meeting the requirements, we can take action to ensure they put matters right.
p.1
Summary of outcome
On 30 January 2020, we carried out an inspection and found the provider was not meeting some of these requirements. The overall effectiveness of the provision was judged to be not met. The inspection report sets out the actions the provider was asked to take to meet the requirements.
p.1
Summary of outcome
On 15 December 2020, while routine inspections were suspended, we carried out an interim visit. The focus of the visit was to check whether the provider had met the safeguarding and welfare actions raised at their last inspection.
p.1
Summary of outcome
We found that the provider has improved children's access to outdoor play each session. They use local parks and playgrounds, as well as their own outdoor area, which they continue to develop. Staff attended training following the inspection. This improved their knowledge about the wider aspects of safeguarding children. There is also evidence that practitioners suitability has been checked. Since the last inspection, there has been a change to the management structure and arrangements for supervision, coaching and development of staff is being embedded into practice. We are satisfied the provider has met the safeguarding and welfare actions raised at the last inspection.
p.1
Summary of outcome
Additionally, during the visit, we found a new area of concern. This means that the provider was not meeting other requirements set out in the Statutory framework for the early years foundation stage. In relation to the new area of concern, we issued an action for the provider to take within the timescale set out. The provider will be able to give parents further information about this.
p.1
Summary of outcome
n inform Ofsted without delay, of any changes to the nominated individual at the setting. The provider is still registered with Ofsted.
p.1
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion