Schools & FE · Independent school inspection
South Devon Steiner School
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
19 Nov 2020
- Inspectors verified
Stewart Gale
- Postcode verified
TQ9 6AB
- Name on report verified
South Devon Steiner School
- URN verified
113603
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- At the time of the previous standard and progress monitoring inspections, weaknesses identified in the recruitment and vetting of staff caused concerns about the possible risk of harm to children in the Early Years Foundation Stage (EYFS standard 3.9). p.4
- Leaders, including trustees, fully acknowledge that previous weaknesses were unacceptable. p.1
- These failures included weaknesses in leaders’ checks of staff prior to appointment, and other safeguarding arrangements, for example those relating to fire safety and the condition of some parts of the premises. p.1
- The senior leadership team, including the designated safeguarding lead (DSL) and special educational needs coordinator (SENCO), identify pupils at risk of harm or those who need additional support as part of an education, health and care (EHC) plan. p.2
- For example, leaders have decommissioned some areas of the school which they feel are unsafe, such as the former forge, which has been fenced off, and the outside cookery area. p.3
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The school does not meet the requirements of the schedule to The Education (Independent School Standards) Regulations 2014 (‘the independent school standards’) and associated requirements that were checked during this inspection, as set out in the annex of this report. p.5
- This included the standards and requirements that the school was judged to not comply with at the previous inspection. p.5
- Not all of the standards and associated requirements were checked during this inspection. p.5
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Leadership & governance39
“Leaders, including trustees, fully acknowledge that previous weaknesses were unacceptable.” p.1Teaching & assessment10
“Leaders have drafted a robust risk assessment for COVID-19 (coronavirus).” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 11
- Words of findings
- 2,302
- longer than usual (typical 1813)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 46, typical 49
- Average sentence
- 18 words
- Next steps
- 3
- typical 8
- Hedged sentences
- 3%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Independent school – progress monitoring inspection report
p.1
South Devon Steiner School Hood Manor, Dartington, Totnes TQ9 6AB
p.1
Main inspection findings
Part 3. Welfare, health and safety of pupils Paragraph 7(a)-(b) At the time of the previous monitoring inspection in November 2019, leaders did not ensure that all safeguarding requirements were being implemented in line with government requirements. These failures included weaknesses in leaders’ checks of staff prior to appointment, and other safeguarding arrangements, for example those relating to fire safety and the condition of some parts of the premises. Leaders, including trustees, fully acknowledge that previous weaknesses were unacceptable. Since the previous progress monitoring inspection, they have overhauled their systems to make the right changes. Trustees work closely with the school business manager to ensure that policies relating to safeguarding and pupils’ welfare now meet requirements and are fully implemented. The reorganisation of the school’s leadership team has established a ‘port-folio’ lead to
p.1
Main inspection findings
focus on pupils’ welfare, health and safety. This has ensured impact. For example, the school’s single central record (SCR) now meets requirements. The standard is now met. Paragraph 11, 12, 16, 16(a)-(b) Leaders have a written health and safety policy. They undertake regular checks to assure themselves that all health and safety policies are being implemented effectively. Leaders and trustees have commissioned specialist external audits to provide further reassurance. For example, they arranged a check to monitor the implementation of the actions arising from the recent fire risk assessment. Leaders have responded positively to the findings of the previous monitoring inspection to address concerns regarding fire risk and management. They have undertaken a full audit to ensure that the site complies with the Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order 2005. For example, fire routes are clearly marked. Emergency lighting and fire doors are
p.1
Main inspection findings
in full working order. Signage is illuminated and set at appropriate intervals to support swift evacuation. The written risk assessment policy is referenced through the school’s health and safety policy. Leaders ensure that the school has appropriate risk assessments. These promote the welfare and safety of pupils. For example, suitable risk assessments are in place for a variety of activities, from handling or petting animals to using sharp equipment for woodcraft. Leaders have drafted a robust risk assessment for COVID-19 (coronavirus). They use this to minimise the risk of transmission of the disease and are implementing it fastidiously. The senior leadership team, including the designated safeguarding lead (DSL) and special educational needs coordinator (SENCO), identify pupils at risk of harm or those who need additional support as part of an education, health and care (EHC) plan. Personalised risk assessments for these pupils demonstrate how staff take additional
p.2
Main inspection findings
measures to support and care for them. The standards in Part 3 are now met. Part 4. Suitability of staff, supply staff, and proprietors Paragraphs 18(2)(e), (3),20(1), 20(6)(b)(iii), 21(1)(3)(a)(viii), 21(6) At the time of the previous inspection, the single central register was not maintained effectively. This raised concerns about the school’s staff recruitment processes and the impact this might have on the safety of pupils. Since then, the school business manager has been diligent in rechecking the information held for every member of staff and ensuring that the single central record is complete. In particular, leaders are ensuring that those who have lived outside of the United Kingdom are checked and verified in line with government guidance. Although this is ongoing, leaders are diligent in seeking the right information. They have been proactive in taking all practicable and reasonable steps to complete these checks.
p.2
Main inspection findings
The suitability of the proprietor has been approved by the Secretary of State. All other relevant checks, for example those for the new chair of the governing board, are complete, including an enhanced criminal record check. The school business manager has undertaken checks of trustees to ensure that they are fit for the duty of governance, including any appointed before 1 May 2007. These checks have also been extended to staff. As a result, the school has ensured that all staff and trustees have had all relevant vetting checks. The standards in this part are now met. Part 5. Premises of and accommodation at schools Paragraph 25 The previous inspection raised several concerns about the condition and maintenance of the school’s premises. These compromised pupils’ safety and their welfare. Leaders have responded robustly to address the issues identified at that time. Leaders have ensured that any steep drops on emergency evacuation routes have steps
p.2
Main inspection findings
so that pupils may exit unhindered. Other improvements include fixing restrictors to all upper floor windows. An emergency escape stairwell has been painted and stairs fitted with new treads. All defects identified at the previous inspection have been satisfactorily remedied. Leaders, including trustees, now have effective systems in place to maintain the school’s accommodation and premises to an acceptable standard. They undertake routine premises checks to identify necessary works and take steps to remedy these. For example, leaders have decommissioned some areas of the school which they feel are unsafe, such as the former forge, which has been fenced off, and the outside cookery area. Leaders are taking further actions to avoid unnecessary risks for pupils. For example, they recognised that the grounds may benefit from further external lighting. While the existing lighting complies with the independent school standards (ISS), leaders are
p.3
Main inspection findings
seeking to increase the number of lights. Since the previous monitoring inspection, leaders have commissioned cleaners to maintain the school site to an acceptable standard. This has ensured that the interior of the building is clean and orderly. The standard in this paragraph is now met. Part 8. Quality of leadership in and management of schools Paragraphs 34(1), 34(1)(a)-(b) Since the previous inspection in November 2019, leaders have completed a full restructure of roles within the school. This took effect from September 2020. Although leaders and trustees are enthusiastic about their new ways of working, there is more to do to improve leadership. Leaders’ strategic planning is weak. Leaders have not yet completed their own evaluation of the school’s strengths and weaknesses. Consequently, there is no agreed school development plan in place yet. Leaders are introducing new expectations to improve teachers’ assessment and
p.3
Main inspection findings
performance, and pupils’ progress. However, these actions are very recent and have not yet had time to embed, or impact well enough. Leaders have not allocated key responsibilities clearly enough. There is some ambiguity about leadership roles and responsibilities. For example, trustees are unsure about who is taking the lead for vulnerable pupils, including those with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND), or children looked after. As a result, trustees are not entirely sure of who is taking responsibility, and for what. Altogether, these are barriers which currently hinder the effectiveness of leaders, and their capacity to improve some key aspects of the school. The standards in this part remain unmet. Paragraph 34(1)(c) Previously this standard was unmet as there were too many weaknesses in the school’s provision and arrangements to promote pupils’ welfare. However, leaders and trustees
p.3
Main inspection findings
took these shortcomings seriously. They have revised their policies and practices to help keep pupils safe. Leaders have addressed previous weaknesses in other parts of the ISS to improve the culture of safety and well-being for pupils. The school now meets the requirements set out in Parts 3, 4 and 5 of the standards. The standard in this paragraph is now met. Overall, the standards in this part are not met. Statutory requirements of the Early Years Foundation Stage At the time of the previous standard and progress monitoring inspections, weaknesses identified in the recruitment and vetting of staff caused concerns about the possible risk of harm to children in the Early Years Foundation Stage (EYFS standard 3.9). Since then, leaders’ comprehensive checks of all staff and trustees working in the school mean that there is now confidence in the suitability of adults working with children in the
p.4
Main inspection findings
Early Years Foundation Stage. Leaders’ improved knowledge, together with the enhanced checks for the SCR, have contributed well so that this requirement is now met.
p.4
Compliance with regulatory requirements
The school does not meet the requirements of the schedule to The Education (Independent School Standards) Regulations 2014 (‘the independent school standards’) and associated requirements that were checked during this inspection, as set out in the annex of this report. This included the standards and requirements that the school was judged to not comply with at the previous inspection. Not all of the standards and associated requirements were checked during this inspection.
p.5
The school now meets the following independent school standards
7. The standards in this paragraph is met if the proprietor ensures that – – (a) arrangements are made to safeguard and promote the welfare of pupils at the school; and – (b) such arrangements have regard to any guidance issued by the Secretary of State. 11. The standard in this paragraph is met if the proprietor ensures that relevant health and safety laws are complied with by the drawing up and effective implementation of a written health and safety policy. 12. The standard in this paragraph is met if the proprietor ensures compliance with the Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order 2005. 16. The standard in this paragraph is met if the proprietor ensures that – – (a) the welfare of pupils at the school is safeguarded and promoted by the drawing up and effective implementation of a written risk assessment policy; and – (b) appropriate action is taken to reduce risks that are identified. 18.(2) The standard in this paragraph is met if –
p.5
The school now meets the following independent school standards
– (e) in the case of any person for whom, by reason of that person living or having lived outside the United Kingdom, obtaining such a certificate is not sufficient to establish the person’s suitability to work in a school, such further checks are made as the proprietor considers appropriate, having regard to any guidance issued by the Secretary of State. – (3) The checks referred to in sub-paragraphs (2)(c) and (except where sub-paragraph (4) applies) (2)(e) must be completed before a person’s appointment. 20.(6) The standard in this paragraph is met in relation to an individual (“MB”), not being the Chair of the school, who is a member of body of persons corporate or unincorporate named as the proprietor of the school in the register or in an application to enter the school in the register, if – – (b) subject to sub-paragraphs (7) and (8), the chair of the school makes the following checks relating to MB –
p.5
The school now meets the following independent school standards
– (iii) where, by reasons of MB’s living or having lived outside the United Kingdom, obtaining an enhanced criminal record certificate is not sufficient to establish MB’s suitability to work in a school, such further checks as the Chair of the school considers appropriate, having regard to any guidance issued by the Secretary of State; and , where an enhanced criminal record check is made, the Chair obtains an enhanced criminal record certificate relating to the individual. 21.(3) The information referred to in this sub-paragraph is – – (a) in relation to each member of staff (“S”) appointed on or after 1st May 2007, whether – – (viii) checks were made pursuant to paragraph 18(2)(e), including the date on which each such check was completed or the certificate obtained. 25. The standard in this paragraph is met if the proprietor ensures that the school premises and the accommodation and facilities provided therein are maintained to a
p.5
The school now meets the following independent school standards
standard such that, so far as is reasonably practicable, the health, safety and welfare of pupils are ensured. 34.(1) The standard about the quality of leadership and management is met if the proprietor ensures that persons with leadership and management responsibilities at the school – – (c) actively promote the well-being of pupils.
p.6
School details
This inspection was carried out under section 109(1) and (2) of the Education and Skills Act 2008, the purpose of which is to advise the Secretary of State for Education about the school’s suitability for continued registration as an independent school.
p.7
School details
Gender of pupils in the sixth form Mixed
p.7
School details
Of which, number on roll in sixth form 9
p.7
School details
Proprietor Rudolph Steiner School (South Devon) Limited Chair Rob Worthington
p.7
School details
Annual fees (day pupils) £5,160 to £8,400
p.7
School details
Email address enquiries@steiner-south-devon.org
p.7
School details
Date of previous standard inspection 2–4 April 2019
p.7
Information about this school
South Devon Steiner School was founded by a group of parents in 1980. The school aims to provide a Steiner Waldorf education, promoting the fundamental principle of protecting the right to childhood and creative abilities for life. The school is based in a former manor house and other buildings on the same site approximately three miles northwest of Totnes, Devon. The Department for Education has agreed several modifications to the learning and development requirements of the Early Years Foundation Stage (EYFS). The school is exempt from completing the EYFS profile at the end of the academic year in which the child reaches the age of five. The school does not use any alternative provision. The school had its last standard inspection in April 2019 and was judged inadequate. Since the last progress monitoring inspection, the proprietor has deregistered and ceased to offer boarding provision.
p.7
Information about this school
The chair of governors is new to the role. He took on these duties earlier in the week of this inspection.
p.8
Information about this inspection
This inspection was carried out at the request of the registration authority for independent schools. The purpose of the inspection was to monitor the progress the school has made in meeting the independent school standards and other requirements that it was judged to not comply with at its previous inspection. The Department for Education did not commission Ofsted to evaluate the school’s progress in meeting previously unmet standards in Part 1 of the independent school standards: Quality of Education. This is owing to the disruption COVID-19 (coronavirus) has had on schools since March 2020. This was the second progress monitoring inspection since the standard inspection in April 2019. The first progress monitoring inspection was completed in November 2019. Since the previous progress monitoring inspection and at the registration authority’s request, the proprietor produced a second action plan. This was evaluated by Ofsted in
p.9
Information about this inspection
February 2020. The registration authority rejected the school’s action plan. This inspection was carried out in accordance with the ‘Handbook for additional inspections of independent schools’, and our published operational note. Therefore, the school had approximately 30 minutes’ advanced notification of the inspection. The inspector held discussions with the headteacher, school business manager, designated safeguarding lead and the SENCO. The inspector did not visit lessons or speak with class teachers or pupils. The inspector met with two trustees, including the newly appointed chair. The inspector reviewed a range of documentation, including policies, safety checks, risk assessments, external audits and other records maintained by school staff. The inspector toured the site with leaders to evaluate how well leaders and managers are ensuring that the health and safety standards are maintained.
p.9
Information about this inspection
The change to the school’s boarding registration meant that there were revisions to the scope of this inspection, as seen in the registering authority’s ‘Inspection commissioning form’. Hence, this inspection did not consider any unmet standards that relate to boarding provision or the national minimum standards (NMS) for boarding.
p.9
Inspection team
Stewart Gale, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector
p.9
The school does not meet the following independent school standards
Standards that were not met at the previous inspection and remain un-met at this inspection
p.10
Part 8. Quality of leadership in and management of schools
34(1) The standard about the quality of leadership and management is met if the proprietor ensures that persons with leadership and management responsibilities at the school – – 34(1)(a) demonstrate good skills and knowledge appropriate to their role so that the independent school standards are met consistently; – 34(1)(b) fulfil their responsibilities effectively so that the independent school standards are met consistently. guidance ‘Raising concerns and making a complaint about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/publications/complaints-about-ofsted . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.10
Part 8. Quality of leadership in and management of schools
Parent View You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.
p.11
Part 8. Quality of leadership in and management of schools
You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk , or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.gov.uk/ofsted .
p.11
Part 8. Quality of leadership in and management of schools
achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.11
Part 8. Quality of leadership in and management of schools
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.11
Part 8. Quality of leadership in and management of schools
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.11
Part 8. Quality of leadership in and management of schools
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.11
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion