Other · Ofsted report
Bodywork Company Performing Arts Cambridge
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
25 Nov 2020
- Postcode verified
CB1 2HA
- Name on report verified
Bodyworks Company Performing Arts
- URN verified
50009
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No next steps set out.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Leadership & governance8
“Leaders’ reporting to governors is weak.” p.2Teaching & assessment4
“Managers’ risk assessment arrangements are limited.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 4
- Words of findings
- 647
- shorter than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 39, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 14 words
- Next steps
- 0
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 2%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Bodyworks Company Performing Arts Monitoring visit report
p.1
Name of lead inspector: Jules Steele, SHMI
p.1
Type of provider: Dance and drama school
p.1
Address: 25–29 Glisson Rd Cambridge CB1 2HA Monitoring visit: Bodyworks Company Performing Arts, 25 November 2020
p.1
Context and focus of visit
On 17 March 2020, all routine inspections were suspended due to the COVID-19 (coronavirus) pandemic. As part of our phased return to routine inspections, we are carrying out monitoring visits to providers in certain circumstances. This monitoring visit focused on safeguarding arrangements and was undertaken as outlined in the interim phase operational note for further education and skills and with reference to the further education and skills handbook.
p.2
Context and focus of visit
This was an announced monitoring inspection, which focused on leaders’ and managers’ safeguarding procedures for learners, following safeguarding concerns that had been brought to Ofsted’s attention.
p.2
Insufficient progress
This inspection has highlighted very serious concerns about the inadequacy of safeguarding arrangements. Leaders are not proactive or rigorous. They do not ensure the safety and well-being of learners. This puts young people at risk of harm.
p.2
Insufficient progress
Leaders’ arrangements to keep learners safe while at college are insufficient. Managers’ risk assessment arrangements are limited. On occasion, staff do not adhere to these limited protocols. Consequently, staff allow visiting tutors unsupervised access to learners. Leaders do not check visiting tutors’ suitability to work with learners. For example, they do not always take up references. They do not check that visiting tutors are security cleared to work unaccompanied.
p.2
Insufficient progress
Leaders’ reporting to governors is weak. Leaders do not systematically analyse and report safeguarding issues to the board of governors. Consequently, governors are unaware of the breadth of safeguarding incidents which managers and staff deal with. Leaders did not involve governors in the recent appointment of a senior staff member. In the last month, the governing body has resigned.
p.2
Insufficient progress
Tutors do not systematically teach learners how to stay safe in the performing arts world. Learners’ understanding of key dangers is shallow. Teachers do not cover in depth key topics, for example homophobia, or protecting themselves from sexual predators. Learners do, however, have a detailed understanding of preventing physical injuries to themselves.
p.2
Insufficient progress
Leaders’ ongoing scrutiny of safeguarding arrangements is weak. They are not methodical or thorough. They do not act upon their own findings when they do review safeguarding. For example, when they audited their e-safety arrangements, Monitoring visit: Bodyworks Company Performing Arts, 25 November 2020 they found that staff did not know how to report and manage e-safety concerns. Managers identified that there was no process in place to monitor e-safety, and yet they have not taken corrective action.
p.2
Insufficient progress
Learners feel safe at college. They adopted the new COVID-19 safety measures quickly and adapted their practice. Learners are confident to take their concerns to staff. Staff’s recording of the help and care they provide for learners is suitably detailed. Staff help learners to access appropriate specialist external advice when needed. Monitoring visit: Bodyworks Company Performing Arts, 25 November 2020 regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding
p.3
Insufficient progress
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.4
Insufficient progress
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.4
Insufficient progress
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.4
Insufficient progress
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.4
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion