Social care · Social care assurance visit
Children's Home run by My Choice Children’s Homes Limited in West Sussex
Summary
Sarah Olliver (lead), Matt Nicholls
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Group verified
My Choice Children’s Homes Ltd
- Inspection datesingle source
6 Feb 2020
- Inspectors verified
Matt Nicholls, Sarah Olliver
- Name on report verified
Assurance visit
- URN verified
SC014650
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The registered person must review the appropriateness and suitability of the location of the premises used for the purposes of the children’s home at least once in each calendar year taking into account the requirement in regulation 12(2)(c) (the protection of children standard). p.4
- Regulation 19(2) details sanctions that are prohibited in behaviour management. p.4
- Any sanctions used to address poor behaviour should be restorative in nature, to help children recognise the impact of their behaviour on themselves, other children, the staff caring for them and the wider community. p.4
- In some cases it will be important for children to make reparation in some form to anyone hurt by their behaviour and the staff in the home should be skilled to support the child to understand this and carry it out. p.4
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 6
- Words of findings
- 471
- about usual (typical 479)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 43, typical 47
- Average sentence
- 17 words
- Next steps
- 4
- typical 4
- Hedged sentences
- 7%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Assurance visit report: SC014650 1 SC014650
p.1
Information about this children’s home
The staff at this home look after up to four children who display difficult behaviours and have learning difficulties, and who are often at risk of self-harm, substance misuse and sexual exploitation.
p.1
Information about this children’s home
The manager was registered in November 2019.
p.1
Information about this children’s home
Previous inspection date: 6 February 2020
p.1
Information about this children’s home
Previous inspection judgement: Sustained effectiveness
p.1
Information about this visit
Due to COVID-19 (coronavirus), Ofsted suspended all routine inspections in March 2020. As part of a phased return to routine inspection, we are undertaking assurance visits to children’s social care services that are inspected under the social care common inspection framework (SCCIF).
p.1
Information about this visit
At these visits, inspectors evaluate the extent to which:
p.1
Information about this visit
children are well cared for children are safe leaders and managers are exercising strong leadership.
p.1
Information about this visit
This visit was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000, following the published guidance for assurance visits.
p.1
Information about this visit
Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills is leading Ofsted’s work into how England’s social care system has delivered child-centred practice and care within the context of the restrictions placed on society during the COVID-19 pandemic.
p.1
Findings from the visit
We did not identify any serious or widespread concerns in relation to the care or protection of children at this assurance visit. Assurance visit report: SC014650 2
p.1
The care of children
The children benefit from positive relationships with a core group of staff who are well known to them. Inspectors observed warm nurturing relationships between the children and the staff. The children speak positively about these relationships. They can approach staff if they have any worries, and they feel listened to.
p.2
The care of children
During the lockdown period, regular phone and video calls took place between the children and key people in their lives. As a result, the children have maintained relationships that are important for their sense of identity. Parents are positive about the open communication with the home during this time.
p.2
The care of children
The staff found creative ways to occupy the children during the COVID-19 lockdown period. This included playing board games, having movie nights and improving the garden. The children spoke positively of this time, feeling that they had ‘plenty to do’. The staff describe a range of benefits in spending more time with the children, including strengthened relationships with them.
p.2
The care of children
Education for the children continued during the lockdown period. The home’s own school continued to provide work or to teach the children in bubbles. Since September the children have been able to return to education settings. Close liaison has continued between the staff and education providers to ensure that the children receive support and encouragement to promote their education.
p.2
The care of children
The children receive sanctions for unwanted behaviours. However, not all these sanctions offer opportunities for a restorative way to put things right. In one example, a child is paying back a fine over a period of over six months with no alternatives to reduce this or work towards resolving this sooner.
p.2
The safety of children
The core staff understand the children’s needs. They follow strategies that help to reduce risk and work collaboratively with the children’s network of professionals. However, for staff who are less familiar with the children this is not consistent. In one example, a senior staff member from another home and an agency worker failed to follow risk management plans, which resulted in two children leaving the home at night. On this occasion, the staff failed to take effective action, despite the known risks of the children leaving the home.
p.2
The safety of children
There are ongoing safeguarding concerns relating to the children in this home and other nearby homes within the organisation. There are some good examples of effective contextual safeguarding, where home managers have worked together and succeeded in addressing some risky behaviours between the children. However, relationships between some of the children remain concerning. While specialist support for one child has been identified, this is not yet in place. Assurance visit report: SC014650 3 During the lockdown period, there was a significant reduction in risk-taking behaviour. The children engaged positively with staff without the influence of other children outside of the home. The wider organisation has planned a risk management meeting to include the nearby home managers, to review the strategies to reduce the risk of the children meeting up and engaging in dangerous behaviours.
p.2
The safety of children
The staff have knowledge of the local risk areas. These have been woven into the children’s individual plans. However, the location assessment fails to include this intelligence, which is intrinsic to the safeguarding of children.
p.3
Leaders and managers
The registered manager is child focused. Staff departures have provided him with the opportunity to recruit a team of like-minded individuals. The staff speak positively about the support they receive from the registered manager and the children find him approachable and readily available.
p.3
Leaders and managers
Managerial monitoring has highlighted the need for staff reporting and recording to be accurate and more frequently updated. Together with the deputy home manager, the registered manager has developed a plan to address this with SMART targets and clear actions to address further shortfalls should they arise.
p.3
Leaders and managers
The registered manager finds the independent reports useful to inform practice improvements. However, due to the virtual way of working during the lockdown period, the opportunity to discuss the findings of the independent visitor during the visit has been eroded. Consequently, some of the information in the reports is inaccurate. The registered manager has plans in place to increase communication with the independent visitor to address this.
p.3
Leaders and managers
The home’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic has been thorough. Clear risk management strategies are in place. Appropriate checks occur when visitors come to the home and frequent reviews are undertaken to continue to meet the current guidance. These measures contribute to ensuring that the children remain safe and healthy.
p.3
Leaders and managers
The previous recommendations have been met. Assurance visit report: SC014650 4
p.3
Statutory requirements
This section sets out the actions that the registered person(s) must take to meet the Care Standards Act 2000, Children’s Homes (England) Regulations 2015 and the ‘Guide to the children’s homes regulations including the quality standards’. The registered person(s) must comply within the given timescales.
p.4
Requirement Due date
The protection of children standard is that children are protected from harm and enabled to keep themselves safe.
p.4
Requirement Due date
In particular, the standard in paragraph (1) requires the registered person to ensure—
p.4
Requirement Due date
that staff— take effective action whenever there is a serious concern about a child’s welfare. (Regulation 12 (1) (2)(a)(vi)) 13/12/2020
p.4
Requirement Due date
The registered person must review the appropriateness and suitability of the location of the premises used for the purposes of the children’s home at least once in each calendar year taking into account the requirement in regulation 12(2)(c) (the protection of children standard). (Regulation 46 (1)) 13/12/2020
p.4
Recommendations
Regulation 19(2) details sanctions that are prohibited in behaviour management. Any sanctions used to address poor behaviour should be restorative in nature, to help children recognise the impact of their behaviour on themselves, other children, the staff caring for them and the wider community. In some cases it will be important for children to make reparation in some form to anyone hurt by their behaviour and the staff in the home should be skilled to support the child to understand this and carry it out. (‘Guide to the children’s homes regulations including the quality standards’, pages 46-47, paragraph 9.38) Assurance visit report: SC014650 5
p.4
Children’s home details
Registered provider: My Choice Children’s Homes Ltd
p.5
Children’s home details
Registered provider address: My Choice Children’s Homes Ltd, Unit 3a, Mill Green Business Estate, Mill Green Road, Haywards Heath RH16 1XQ
p.5
Inspectors
Sarah Olliver, Social Care Inspector Matt Nicholls, Social Care Inspector Assurance visit report: SC014650 6 to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.5
Inspectors
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.6
Inspectors
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.6
Inspectors
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.6
Inspectors
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.6
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion