Social care · Social care assurance visit
Children's Home run by Ethelbert Specialist Homes Limited in Kent
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Group verified
Ethelbert Specialist Homes Limited
- Inspection datesingle source
10 Mar 2020
- Inspectors verified
John Pledger
- Name on report verified
Assurance visit
- URN verified
SC023744
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The registered person is responsible for deciding what each review should focus on, based on the specific circumstances of the home at that particular time and any areas of high risk to the children that the home is designed to care for, such as missing or exploitation. p.3
- They will also consider what information or data recorded in the home will form part of the evidence base for their analysis and conclusions. p.3
- There is no expectation that the registered person will review the home against every part of the Quality Standards every six months – registered persons should use their professional judgement to decide which factors to focus on. p.3
- The review should enable the registered person to identify areas of strength and possible weakness in the home’s care, which will be captured in the written report. p.3
- The report should clearly identify any actions required for the next six months of delivery within the home and how those actions will be addressed. p.3
- Where the placing authority or another relevant person does not provide the input and services needed to meet a child’s needs during their time in the home or in preparation for leaving the home, the home must challenge them to meet the child’s needs (see regulations 5 (c)). p.3
- Staff should act as champions for their children, expecting nothing less than a good parent would. p.3
- The registered person should consider the use of an independent advocate (see paragraph 4.16) if the child’s needs are not being met. p.3
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 5
- Words of findings
- 539
- about usual (typical 479)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 47, typical 47
- Average sentence
- 23 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 4
- Hedged sentences
- 0%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Assurance visit report: SC023744 1 SC023744
p.1
Information about this children’s home
This children’s home provides care and accommodation for up to three children with social, emotional and/or mental health needs. It is privately owned and part of a larger company, which has a number of similar homes in the area. Children may attend one of the schools that are run by the company.
p.1
Information about this children’s home
The manager was registered with Ofsted on 5 March 2012.
p.1
Information about this visit
Due to COVID-19 (coronavirus), Ofsted suspended all routine inspections in March 2020. As part of a phased return to routine inspection, we are undertaking assurance visits to children’s social care services that are inspected under the social care common inspection framework (SCCIF).
p.1
Information about this visit
At these visits, inspectors evaluate the extent to which:
p.1
Information about this visit
children are well cared for children are safe leaders and managers are exercising strong leadership. This visit was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000, following the published guidance for assurance visits.
p.1
Information about this visit
Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills is leading Ofsted’s work into how England’s social care system has delivered child-centred practice and care within the context of the restrictions placed on society during the COVID-19 pandemic.
p.1
Findings from the visit
Assurance visit report: SC023744 2 We did not identify any serious or widespread concerns in relation to the care or protection of children at this assurance visit.
p.2
The care of children
This has been a settled period for the home, despite the restrictions and challenges posed by the COVID-19 pandemic. A stable staff team has provided the children with consistent, good-quality care that has enabled the children to continue to engage with their learning. The children continue to feel settled despite the many changes in routines and activities.
p.2
The care of children
Relationships between staff and the children have deepened during this period. The children are positive about the staff and their experience of care during the period of restrictions. The staff speak highly of the way that children have coped, with one member of staff saying, ‘They have been an absolute credit to themselves.’
p.2
The care of children
The children have felt increasingly able to talk about things that worry and frustrate them, as well as plans about their futures. Some of the children who are experiencing frustration and uncertainty about how their next steps are being managed require the additional support of an independent advocate.
p.2
The care of children
A proactive and thoughtful approach by staff has enabled the children to maintain meaningful contact with the people who are important to them during the COVID-19 restrictions. Staff have also ensured that the children have been able to continue accessing specialist services during this time. The children have been prepared by the staff for the second period of restrictions.
p.2
The safety of children
The children talk about the clear routines and structure that staff maintain in the home, as well as how settled the staff team has become. The children express feelings of attachment and belonging and say that they feel safe.
p.2
The safety of children
There has been a substantial reduction in disruptive incidents in the home during the period of COVID-19 restrictions. For more than three months, there has been no need for staff to use any restrictive measures to ensure the children’s safety or to prevent harm.
p.2
The safety of children
No children have gone missing during this period. Clear and current assessments and plans provide the staff with meaningful guidance in how to best manage the children’s strong emotions and how to keep them safe.
p.2
Leaders and managers
The manager displays a comprehensive understanding of all aspects of the running of the home. This includes the progress and well-being of the children and the Assurance visit report: SC023744 3 performance of the staff. She expresses confidence in the staff and their capacity to provide consistency and continuity of care for the children.
p.2
Leaders and managers
The manager is clear, proactive and reflective in her leadership. Senior staff in the home express confidence in the manager, and pride in the progress the children have made.
p.3
Leaders and managers
The disruption caused by COVID-19 to the planned refurbishment and redecoration of the home is being well managed and the children made no mention of this being an issue for them.
p.3
Leaders and managers
Effective communication within the staff team and between leaders and managers has been maintained during the period of restrictions. The leadership of the wider organisation has been effective in providing support and direction to the home in the response to all aspects of the COVID-19 pandemic.
p.3
Leaders and managers
The manager has maintained the standards of regular staff supervision throughout the lockdown period and this, together with effective communication, has contributed significantly to the consistency and continuity of the children’s care.
p.3
Leaders and managers
The manager closely monitors the running of the home and the progress and well- being of the children. However, effective use is not being made of this information in children’s care reviews, to further improve the quality of care being provided by staff.
p.3
Recommendations
The registered person is responsible for deciding what each review should focus on, based on the specific circumstances of the home at that particular time and any areas of high risk to the children that the home is designed to care for, such as missing or exploitation. They will also consider what information or data recorded in the home will form part of the evidence base for their analysis and conclusions. There is no expectation that the registered person will review the home against every part of the Quality Standards every six months – registered persons should use their professional judgement to decide which factors to focus on. The review should enable the registered person to identify areas of strength and possible weakness in the home’s care, which will be captured in the written report. The report should clearly identify any actions required for the next six months of delivery within the home and how those actions will be addressed. The
p.3
Recommendations
whole review process and the resulting report should be used as a tool for continuous improvement in the home. (‘Guide to the children’s homes regulations, including the quality standards’, page 65, paragraph 15.4) Assurance visit report: SC023744 4 Where the placing authority or another relevant person does not provide the input and services needed to meet a child’s needs during their time in the home or in preparation for leaving the home, the home must challenge them to meet the child’s needs (see regulations 5 (c)). Staff should act as champions for their children, expecting nothing less than a good parent would. The registered person should consider the use of an independent advocate (see paragraph 4.16) if the child’s needs are not being met. (‘Guide to the children’s homes regulations including the quality standards’, page 12, paragraph 2.8)
p.3
Children’s home details
Registered provider: Ethelbert Specialist Homes Limited
p.4
Children’s home details
Registered provider address: Ethelbert Specialist Homes Limited, 17 Leigh Road, Ramsgate, Kent CT12 5EU
p.4
Children’s home details
Responsible individual: Leslie Davenport
p.4
Inspector:
John Pledger, Social Care Inspector Assurance visit report: SC023744 5 to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.4
Inspector:
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.5
Inspector:
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.5
Inspector:
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.5
Inspector:
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.5
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion