Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted letter

Setting

Inspected — · published 17 Dec 2020

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Tim Hill (lead), Chris Pollitt

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Chris Pollitt, Tim Hill

  • Postcode verified

    B93 0AJ

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

0Mixedmore positive than 20% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspection positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No next steps set out.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
27
shorter than usual (typical 963)
Reading level
—
Average sentence
14 words
Next steps
0
typical 2
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 4%About the inspection 96%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Paul Yeomans Acting Headteacher Springfield House Community Special School Kenilworth Road Knowle Solihull West Midlands B93 0AJ

p.1

Ofsted remote visit to Springfield House Community Special School

Following my remote visit with Tim Hill, Her Majesty’s Inspector (HMI), to your school on 12 November 2020, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the visit’s findings. Thank you for the time you made available to discuss your actions since September 2020, when the government expected all schools to open fully to all pupils.

p.1

Ofsted remote visit to Springfield House Community Special School

This visit was conducted under section 8 of the Education Act 2005 (as amended) and in accordance with Ofsted’s published procedures for visiting schools while routine inspections are temporarily suspended. Following changes to government guidance and the imposition of COVID-19 (coronavirus) lockdown restrictions, we made this visit remotely to reduce pressure on the school.

p.1

Ofsted remote visit to Springfield House Community Special School

Ofsted’s visits to schools during the autumn term are not inspections. We are not giving graded judgements. We did not undertake the usual range of inspection activities and were unable to check other sources of evidence, such as visits to lessons or looking at pupils’ work. The content of this letter gives an overview of our discussions about what has happened in your school this term.

p.1

Ofsted remote visit to Springfield House Community Special School

During the visit, we spoke to you, the senior leadership team, the member of staff responsible for safeguarding and the lead practitioner for behaviour and safety. We did not speak to pupils.

p.1

Context

Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills is leading Ofsted’s work into how England’s education system is managing the return to full education for pupils, following an extended break in formal schooling due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

p.2

Context

In undertaking this focused work, HMI are visiting a broad range of schools. HMI will visit a sample of:

p.2

Context

 approximately 1,200 schools across all Ofsted grades (outstanding, good, requires improvement and inadequate)  maintained schools, academies and free schools, special schools and centres of alternative provision, including those in cities, and coastal, town or rural communities.

p.2

Context

The information from this visit will feed into Ofsted’s national reporting so that the insights can be shared with the government and the education sector. We did not find any significant concerns during the visit. In such a case, an inspection report would be published on our website and available to parents and carers.

p.2

Context

We did not consider your response to COVID-19 during the spring and summer terms 2020, when the school was not open to all pupils.

p.2

From this visit, inspectors noted that:

 At the time of the visit, there were no ‘bubbles’ isolating away from school due to COVID-19. A small number of children are currently self-isolating because of positive cases at home. Since the start of the autumn term 2020, there has been one case where two groups of pupils and linked staff have had to be sent home due to a positive case of COVID-19.  Except for a modern foreign language subject, pupils are studying all national curriculum subjects. While you would like to return to your full curriculum by spring 2021, you feel it will not be fully in place until September 2021.  You told us that teachers have recently completed checks on what pupils have remembered in English and mathematics. You told us that these checks have highlighted the gaps that have appeared in pupils’ readiness to learn. Your recovery curriculum is focusing on rebuilding these skills and overcoming the difficult experiences that pupils faced during the lockdown.

p.2

From this visit, inspectors noted that:

 In reading, while pupils seem to have maintained their decoding skills, you think that their ability to understand what they have read has been more of a struggle for them since they have returned.  In mathematics, you have noticed that pupils’ ability to use and apply their knowledge in different mathematical problems is not as strong now as it was.  In terms of remote learning, you provided online learning packs and, where needed, you provided pupils with paper-based learning packs linked to all areas of the curriculum. You mentioned that these packs are tailored to their ability. You decided to use a paper-based approach because you feel many pupils would have had difficulty accessing online learning.

p.2

From this visit, inspectors noted that:

Thank you again for contributing to this important national work. The views and experiences you have shared will help to inform future policy.

p.3

From this visit, inspectors noted that:

I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Birmingham. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion