Other · Ofsted report
New Model Business Academy Limited
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
28 Oct 2020
- Postcode verified
HD1 6NA
- Name on report verified
New Model Business Academy Limited
- URN verified
1280367
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No next steps set out.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 5
- Words of findings
- 21
- shorter than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- —
- Average sentence
- 7 words
- Next steps
- 0
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 0%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
New Model Business Academy Limited Monitoring visit report
p.1
Name of lead inspector: Steve Hunsley HMI
p.1
Type of provider: Independent learning provider
p.1
Address:
St Andrews House St Andrews Road Huddersfield HD1 6NA Monitoring visit: New Model Business Academy Limited, 27–28 October 2020
p.1
Context and focus of visit
From October 2018, Ofsted undertook to carry out monitoring visits to all newly directly funded providers of apprenticeship training provision which began to be funded from April 2017 or after by ESFA and/or the apprenticeship levy. This provider received a monitoring visit under these arrangements and was found to be making insufficient progress against one or more themes.
p.2
Context and focus of visit
On 17 March 2020, all routine inspections were suspended due to the COVID-19 (coronavirus) pandemic. As part of our phased return to routine inspections, we are carrying out additional monitoring visits to new providers that were judged to be making insufficient progress against one or more themes at their previous monitoring visit and would have been due their full inspection up to or during the interim phase but have not received it because of the suspension of routine inspections. This monitoring visit was undertaken as part of those arrangements as outlined in the interim phase operational note for further education and skills and with reference to the further education and skills handbook and is focused on the themes set out below.
p.2
Context and focus of visit
New Model Business Academy Limited began to deliver apprenticeships in April 2018. At the time of the monitoring visit, 96 apprentices were on level 4 standards-based apprenticeships, of whom 78 were on financial adviser programmes and 18 were on paraplanner programmes. New Model Business Academy Limited works with employers in the financial services sector across England.
p.2
Insufficient progress
Senior leaders and managers do not ensure that the apprenticeships that they offer meet the needs of apprentices or their employers. Managers do not structure programmes well enough. As a result, apprentices struggle to gain the skills and knowledge that they require to become confident and able financial advisers or paraplanners. Apprenticeship development managers (ADMs) focus too much on helping apprentices pass their financial services examinations and not enough on the development of the knowledge, skills and behaviours that apprentices need in their current or future job roles.
p.2
Insufficient progress
Apprentices and their employers appear unsure about the requirements of an apprenticeship. Many consider the programme to be purely examination based, and do not focus enough on the requirements of the apprenticeship standard. For Monitoring visit: New Model Business Academy Limited, 27–28 October 2020 example, apprentices are not made aware of any contemporary issues that are affecting the financial services sector. Leaders do not involve employers well enough in planning the apprenticeship. This means that employers do not provide apprentices with the high-quality, on-the-job training opportunities that they need.
p.2
Insufficient progress
Although leaders and managers recognise the strengths and weaknesses of their provision, they have been too slow to address weaknesses identified at the previous monitoring visit. The actions that they have taken, such as working with external partners to identify the improvements they need to make, have not had enough positive impact for apprentices and their employers.
p.3
Insufficient progress
Managers ensure that staff are highly experienced in the financial sector. However, most staff are not appropriately skilled in the delivery of apprenticeships.
p.3
Insufficient progress
Senior leaders recognise the skills shortages in the financial sector and have a clear rationale for the delivery of financial adviser and paraplanning apprenticeships. They use their experience and contacts effectively to work with small- to medium-sized businesses to meet the growing demand in the industry.
p.3
Insufficient progress
Managers and ADMs concentrate too much on tasks that focus solely on helping apprentices to pass their financial examinations, and do not pay sufficient attention to the development of apprentices’ skills and behaviours. Consequently, apprentices make slow progress towards achieving the expected outcomes of their apprenticeship, and too many continue in learning beyond their expected end date.
p.3
Insufficient progress
Leaders and ADMs do not recognise the importance of on- and off-the-job training in the apprenticeship programmes. They do not provide enough information to employers about the training or include them in its delivery. This limits the opportunities for apprentices to learn in the workplace. Apprentices’ learning is too often limited to working through specific chapters of a textbook to prepare for taking their next examination.
p.3
Insufficient progress
Managers do not plan programmes in a way that enables apprentices to fill the gaps in their knowledge of the financial services sector. ADMs and trainers do not assess apprentices well enough to monitor or evaluate their progress. For example, apprentices who do not know enough about financial protection do not have the knowledge that they need to pass their examinations.
p.3
Insufficient progress
Senior leaders and managers have been slow to improve the quality of the provision and the performance of staff. They have made changes to their quality assurance processes and have begun to involve employers in reviewing apprentices’ progress. Monitoring visit: New Model Business Academy Limited, 27–28 October 2020 However, it is too early to see impact on the progress that apprentices make or on the quality of the training that they receive.
p.3
Insufficient progress
Few apprentices improve their English and mathematical skills beyond the requirements of the apprenticeship. Managers do not support apprentices to be more confident in their communication skills when dealing with clients. Apprentices benefit from support to practise their mathematical skills prior to the completion of examinations.
p.4
Reasonable progress
Leaders and managers have effective safeguarding arrangements in place. All staff are suitably qualified, benefit from regular updates, and participate in mandatory training. Staff understand safeguarding procedures and use them effectively whenever there is a need.
p.4
Reasonable progress
Apprentices feel safe in their workplaces and have a sound understanding of safeguarding practices. They know how to report any concerns that they may have and whom to contact.
p.4
Reasonable progress
Apprentices know about the possible criminal activities that may be related to the financial services sector, such as money laundering. However, they do not have a good enough understanding of the wider risks that they may be exposed to, such as radicalisation and extremism. Monitoring visit: New Model Business Academy Limited, 27–28 October 2020 regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding
p.4
Reasonable progress
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.5
Reasonable progress
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.5
Reasonable progress
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.5
Reasonable progress
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.5
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion