Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted letter

Setting

Inspected —

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Sandra Hayes (lead), Ian Tustian

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Ian Tustian, Sandra Hayes

  • Postcode verified

    WR11 1DQ

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

0Mixedmore positive than 20% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspection positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No next steps set out.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
24
shorter than usual (typical 963)
Reading level
—
Average sentence
12 words
Next steps
0
typical 2
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 3%About the inspection 97%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Guy Nichols Headteacher The De Montfort School Four Pools Road Evesham Worcestershire WR11 1DQ

p.1

Ofsted remote visit to The De Montfort School

Following my remote visit with Sandra Hayes, Her Majesty’s Inspector (HMI), to your school on 5 November 2020, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the visit’s findings. Thank you for the time you made available to discuss your actions since September 2020, when the government expected all schools to open fully to all pupils.

p.1

Ofsted remote visit to The De Montfort School

This visit was conducted under section 8 of the Education Act 2005 (as amended) and in accordance with Ofsted’s published procedures for visiting schools while routine inspections are temporarily suspended. Following changes to government guidance and the imposition of COVID-19 lockdown restrictions, we made this visit remotely to reduce pressure on the school.

p.1

Ofsted remote visit to The De Montfort School

Ofsted’s visits to schools during the autumn term are not inspections. We are not giving graded judgements. We did not undertake the usual range of inspection activities and were unable to check other sources of evidence, such as visits to lessons or looking at pupils’ work. The content of this letter gives an overview of our discussions about what has happened in your school this term.

p.1

Ofsted remote visit to The De Montfort School

During the visit, we spoke to you and members of the senior and middle leadership teams. We did not speak to pupils.

p.1

Context

Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills is leading Ofsted’s work into how England’s education system is managing the return to full education for pupils, following an extended break in formal schooling due to the COVID-19 (coronavirus) pandemic.

p.1

Context

In undertaking this focused work, HMI are visiting a broad range of schools. HMI will visit a sample of:

p.2

Context

 approximately 1,200 schools across all Ofsted grades (outstanding, good, requires improvement and inadequate)  maintained schools, academies and free schools, special schools and centres of alternative provision, including those in cities, and coastal, town or rural communities.

p.2

Context

The information from this visit will feed into Ofsted’s national reporting so that the insights can be shared with the government and the education sector. We did not find any significant concerns during the visit. In such a case, an inspection report would be published on our website and available to parents and carers.

p.2

Context

We did not consider your response to COVID-19 during the spring and summer terms 2020, when the school was not open to all pupils.

p.2

From this visit, inspectors noted that:

 You opened fully to all pupils on 9 September 2020. Pupils from each year group returned on a specific day in the week prior to this, as part of a planned phased return.  Pupils’ attendance has increased over time since the school opened fully to all pupils. It is in line with the normal attendance for this time of year.  Pupils in Year 6 are being taught most of the subjects they normally would. You explained that some adaptations have been made to the curriculum. For example, pupils are not being taught computing or some aspects of design technology.  You told us that reading is a priority for pupils in Year 6, and you have provided additional reading material for pupils to encourage them to read more. Teachers plan to address gaps in pupils’ phonic knowledge in lessons through the usual curriculum. You explained that teachers are prioritising pupils’ basic mathematical knowledge, and you have allocated additional time

p.2

From this visit, inspectors noted that:

for pupils in mathematics and English.  In Years 7, 8 and 9, all pupils are studying the subjects they normally would. You explained that in some subjects, such as art, computing, science and design technology, leaders have adapted the curriculum. For example, they are concentrating on the theoretical aspects initially and working towards planned practical activities later in the year.  The vast majority of pupils in Year 11 are studying one subject fewer than they were last year. You told us that this was done in consultation with parents and pupils. You explained that this has given pupils additional teaching time in their remaining subjects.  In Year 13, all students are continuing with the subjects that they were studying prior to September. You highlighted that pupils get additional lesson time to make sure that they cover the full content of their courses. In addition, leaders have made sure that all students in the sixth form have access to the

p.2

From this visit, inspectors noted that:

curriculum remotely.  In Years 10, 11 and 13, you described how teachers have formally assessed pupils to help identify what they know and remember. In other years, you told us that teachers are focusing on identifying gaps in pupils’ knowledge and adapting plans to cover lost learning. In addition, leaders have plans to assess all pupils formally before the end of the autumn term.  If pupils need to work at home, teachers provide them with the work from lessons through the school’s website. You told us that there are plans in place if large numbers of pupils need to study remotely. This would be through a combination of online teacher support and resources for pupils. You highlighted that some pupils’ lack of access to technology is a concern should they need to work at home. Leaders explained that they are using the COVID- 19 catch-up premium to address this.

p.3

From this visit, inspectors noted that:

Thank you again for contributing to this important national work. The views and experiences you have shared will help to inform future policy.

p.3

From this visit, inspectors noted that:

I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Worcestershire. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion