Social care · Social care assurance visit
Children's home run by Ethelbert Specialist Homes Limited in Thanet
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Group verified
Ethelbert Specialist Homes Limited
- Inspection datesingle source
31 Jan 2019
- Inspectors verified
John Pledger
- Name on report verified
Assurance visit
- URN verified
SC023737
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Leadership is strong, clear, insightful and engenders a culture of commitment and teamworking among the staff. p.2
- The registered manager is well supported by senior managers in the wider organisation, who have responded to the challenges presented by COVID-19 in a decisive, positive and child-centred manner. p.3
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The registered person is responsible for deciding what each (regulation 45) review should focus on, based on the specific circumstances of the home at that particular time and any areas of high risk to the children that the home is designed to care for, such as missing or exploitation. p.3
- They will also consider what information or data recorded in the home will form part of the evidence base for their analysis and conclusions. p.3
- There is no expectation that the registered person will review the home against every part of the Quality Standards every six months – registered persons should use their professional judgement to decide which factors to focus on. p.3
- The review should enable the registered person to identify areas of strength and possible weakness in the home’s care, which will be captured in the written report. p.3
- The report should clearly identify any actions required for the next six months of delivery within the home and how those p.3
- The whole review process and the resulting report should be used as a tool for continuous improvement in the home. p.3
- In particular, the registered person should include information from regulation 44 reports as part of the evidence base for their analysis and conclusions and ensure that this information adds value to the process of continuous improvement. p.3
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 5
- Words of findings
- 405
- about usual (typical 479)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 43, typical 47
- Average sentence
- 20 words
- Next steps
- 7
- typical 4
- Hedged sentences
- 0%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Assurance visit report: SC023737 1 SC023737
p.1
Information about this children’s home
The home provides care and accommodation for up to three children with emotional, behavioural and mild learning difficulties. Historically, the home has focused on providing care for girls.
p.1
Information about this children’s home
The manager registered with Ofsted in September 2020.
p.1
Information about this children’s home
Previous inspection date: 31 January 2019
p.1
Information about this visit
Due to COVID-19 (coronavirus), Ofsted suspended all routine inspections in March 2020. As part of a phased return to routine inspection, we are undertaking assurance visits to children’s social care services that are inspected under the social care common inspection framework (SCCIF).
p.1
Information about this visit
At these visits, inspectors evaluate the extent to which:
p.1
Information about this visit
children are well cared for children are safe leaders and managers are exercising strong leadership. This visit was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000, following the published guidance for assurance visits.
p.1
Information about this visit
Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills is leading Ofsted’s work into how England’s social care system has delivered child-centred practice and care within the context of the restrictions placed on society during the COVID-19 pandemic.
p.1
Findings from the visit
We did not identify any serious or widespread concerns in relation to the care or protection of children at this assurance visit. Assurance visit report: SC023737 2
p.1
The care of children
The children’s relationships with staff have strengthened under the restrictions imposed due to COVID-19. The examination of records and discussions with staff show that the children’s needs and vulnerabilities are very well understood, and that staff care greatly about the children’s progress and well-being.
p.2
The care of children
Children new to the home settle, and behaviours to test the care and commitment of staff diminish substantially. Some children settle quickly and soon develop feelings of belonging and attachment to staff.
p.2
The care of children
Staff advocate strongly for the children and go to exceptional lengths to ensure that they receive the correct specialist healthcare when this is needed.
p.2
The care of children
The children’s education is taken very seriously, and staff go to great lengths to support the children’s best possible engagement with their learning. Some children have emerged from lockdown and the summer holidays with a substantially improved attitude and application to their studies.
p.2
The care of children
The children’s continued contact with their families was prioritised when lockdown was imposed, and the relevant technologies were used to make this possible. Contact arrangements have been adjusted as restrictions have changed.
p.2
The safety of children
The children express trust in the registered manager and the staff. The safe and secure environment helps the children to express their anxieties, explore their origins, and start developing a clearer sense of themselves. They express their views, wishes and feelings because they feel safe to do so, and because the staff listen and are responsive.
p.2
The safety of children
Detailed assessments and plans provide staff with insight into the risks and vulnerabilities associated with each child. Staff use this clear guidance on how to minimise these and keep the children safe.
p.2
The safety of children
The staff will go to exceptional lengths to safeguard children when they place themselves at risk or when they might feel afraid or be in strange circumstances. This includes remaining with children continuously when they have needed to stay in hospital.
p.2
Leaders and managers
Leadership is strong, clear, insightful and engenders a culture of commitment and teamworking among the staff. They feel supported and respect and value the leadership provided by the registered manager. Assurance visit report: SC023737 3 Children’s records and plans are of a high standard and are kept current. Liaison with external agencies is strong. Despite a range of challenges, staffing has been consistent, well monitored and maintained during this period.
p.2
Leaders and managers
The registered manager displays clear command over the day-to-day running of the home, and the progress and well-being of the children. However, regarding the application of regulation 45, opportunities are being missed to better understand the quality of care being provided and to apply this analysis to raising standards even further. The recommendation made at the last inspection in this regard is repeated.
p.3
Leaders and managers
The registered manager is well supported by senior managers in the wider organisation, who have responded to the challenges presented by COVID-19 in a decisive, positive and child-centred manner.
p.3
Recommendation
The registered person is responsible for deciding what each (regulation 45) review should focus on, based on the specific circumstances of the home at that particular time and any areas of high risk to the children that the home is designed to care for, such as missing or exploitation. They will also consider what information or data recorded in the home will form part of the evidence base for their analysis and conclusions. There is no expectation that the registered person will review the home against every part of the Quality Standards every six months – registered persons should use their professional judgement to decide which factors to focus on. The review should enable the registered person to identify areas of strength and possible weakness in the home’s care, which will be captured in the written report. The report should clearly identify any actions required for the next six months of delivery within the home and how those
p.3
Recommendation
actions will be addressed. The whole review process and the resulting report should be used as a tool for continuous improvement in the home. (‘Guide to the children’s homes regulations including the quality standards’, page 65, paragraph 15.4)
p.3
Recommendation
In particular, the registered person should include information from regulation 44 reports as part of the evidence base for their analysis and conclusions and ensure that this information adds value to the process of continuous improvement. Assurance visit report: SC023737 4
p.3
Children’s home details
Registered provider: Ethelbert Specialist Homes Limited
p.4
Children’s home details
Registered provider address: Ethelbert Specialist Homes Limited, 17 Leigh Road, Ramsgate, Kent CT12 5EU
p.4
Children’s home details
Responsible individual: Leslie Davenport
p.4
Inspector
John Pledger, Social Care Inspector Assurance visit report: SC023737 5 to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.4
Inspector
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.5
Inspector
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.5
Inspector
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.5
Inspector
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.5
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion