Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
23 Nov 2020
- URN verified
EY562418
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 1
- Words of findings
- 238
- shorter than usual (typical 317)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 44, typical 35
- Average sentence
- 20 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 8%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Summary of outcome
All early years providers must meet the legal requirements in the 'Statutory framework for the early year's foundation stage', which you can find at https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/early-years-foundation-stage-framework If we find that a provider is not meeting the requirements, we can take action to ensure they put matters right.
p.1
Summary of outcome
On 25 November 2019, we carried out an inspection and found the provider was not meeting some of these requirements. The provision was judged to be Not met with enforcement. The inspection report sets out the action the provider was asked to take to meet the requirements.
p.1
Summary of outcome
On 22 January 2020, we carried out a monitoring visit to the provider. The focus of this visit was to check whether the provider had met the welfare requirement notices that were set at the last inspection.
p.1
Summary of outcome
We found that the provider had improved staff knowledge and understanding of the wider aspects of safeguarding children, to help protect children who may be at risk of exposure to extreme views or behaviours. The provider had ensured that unauthorised people were unable to gain access to the building. The provider now records children's hours of attendance and routines had been changed to ensure children were engaged in activities. We also found that made improvements to safer recruitment procedures and had obtained proof of staff's first aid qualifications.
p.1
Summary of outcome
We are satisfied that the provider has met the welfare requirement notices raised. The provider is still registered with Ofsted.
p.1
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion