Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Social care · Social care assurance visit

Children's home run by Protea Care Limited

Inspected 12 Mar 2020 · URN 2502918

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Leemya McKeown

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Group verified

    Protea Care Limited

  • Inspection datesingle source

    12 Mar 2020

  • Inspectors verified

    Leemya McKeown

  • Name on report verified

    Assurance visit

  • URN verified

    2502918

Page 1 of 6
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−69Very criticalmore positive than 7% of reports of this type

Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

Praisenurturingsafeclear
Criticismharmat risknot alwaysnot consistentlylimitednot clearly

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

About the inspectionLeadershipWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Leadership209w−68
  • What needs to improve347w−58

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
6
Words of findings
552
about usual (typical 479)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 45, typical 47
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
7
typical 4
Hedged sentences
6%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Leadership 13%What needs to improve 22%About the inspection 65%

Full report text

Information about this children’s home

This privately owned residential home is registered to support two children aged eight to 18 years who may have social, emotional, mental health or learning needs. The registered manager left the home on 28 May 2020.

p.1

Information about this children’s home

Previous inspection judgement: Improved effectiveness

p.1

Information about this visit

Due to COVID-19 (coronavirus), Ofsted suspended all routine inspections in March 2020. As part of a phased return to routine inspection, we are undertaking assurance visits to children’s social care services that are inspected under the social care common inspection framework (SCCIF).

p.1

Information about this visit

At these visits, inspectors evaluate the extent to which:

p.1

Information about this visit

 children are well cared for  children are safe  leaders and managers are exercising strong leadership.

p.1

Information about this visit

This visit was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000, following the published guidance for assurance visits.

p.1

Information about this visit

Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills is leading Ofsted’s work into how England’s social care system has delivered child-centred practice and care within the context of the restrictions placed on society during the COVID-19 pandemic.

p.1

Findings from the visit

We did not identify any serious or widespread concerns in relation to the care or protection of children at this assurance visit. Assurance visit report: 2502918 2

p.1

The care of children

From April 2020 to September 2020 two children were living at the home. Another child became resident in October 2020 and is currently the only child living at the home.

p.2

The care of children

During the lockdown period the children and staff experienced an unsettled and uncertain time. The children struggled with the limited activities and reduced structure. Being kept indoors created further tensions for the children’s relationships. At the same time, the manager and deputy manager left with little notice, at the end of May and June 2020 respectively. The responsible individual then left a month later.

p.2

The care of children

The newly appointed responsible individual was, however, able to overcome the challenges of instability. The staff created activities to de-escalate challenging behaviours. These included developing arts and crafts projects, organising theme nights and spending quality time with each child. The staff worked closely with the school to replicate a similar timetable to follow at the home. This provided the children with practical opportunities to grow and learn in a structured way.

p.2

The care of children

The senior manager empowered the children to make successful and planned transitions. One young person turned 18 and moved into semi-independent accommodation. The other child moved to a sister home nearby. For both children, the staff continued to support them as they settled into their new homes. This enabled the children to be confident and secure in their future plans.

p.2

The care of children

At the time of the assurance visit, one child had just moved into the home. Due to their complex risks and needs, the staff provide high levels of support. They balance this support with encouraging the child to take part in making decisions about their care. This means that the child’s experience is personalised, and their rights are upheld.

p.2

The care of children

The quality of care is good. This view is shared by parents and external professionals. Staff have travelled considerable distances and provided supervised visits for children to maintain their relationships with family and friends. This enables children to keep a positive sense of their identity.

p.2

The care of children

The home environment needs some improvement. The den area requires redecorating and cleaning. Some of the hallway paintwork is scuffed in places and the garden spaces are overgrown.

p.2

The safety of children

Staff have managed several serious incidents safely. Due to the challenge of lockdown and the complexity of the children’s needs, there had been an increase in the number of incidents. The responsible individual reviewed the triggers for these incidents and identified strategies for prevention. He made plans for an increase in Assurance visit report: 2502918 3 staff support for one child and a supported move to the nearby sister home. The responsible individual has thus supported the child to be safer.

p.2

The safety of children

The staff’s caring approach underpins their ability to keep children safe. The staff are working hard to build a positive relationship with the child who is currently living at the home. The staff show patience, a consistent response and genuine warmth. The staff talk to the child, identifying the positive choices that the child can make and reflect together on negative incidents. This encourages the child to learn from these incidents and gives them positive role models.

p.3

The safety of children

Risk management plans do not include full details of the children’s individual risks or when specific strategies work best. For example, a recent impact risk assessment and healthcare plan did not contain details of the child’s recent self-harming behaviours. The staff are not, therefore, fully prepared to manage these behaviours.

p.3

The safety of children

Although training has continued during the pandemic, not all staff have been able to undertake specialist training to meet the child’s individual needs. This means that some of the staff do not fully understand the child’s behaviours and know how to manage individual risks.

p.3

Leaders and managers

The responsible individual has met the requirement made at the last inspection. He has prioritised stabilising the management of the home. A new manager has been appointed and is now in post.

p.3

Leaders and managers

Staff supervision is not consistently recorded. Therefore, the manager’s ability to use supervision to track staff’s actions and measure their performance is limited.

p.3

Leaders and managers

The staff do not always record information clearly or appropriately. The previous manager used inappropriate terminology to refer to a child in a supervision record. Some records, such as team meeting notes, are not always legible. The manager is aware of these issues and is making changes to records and how they are kept.

p.3

Leaders and managers

Staff have responded well to the changes that the manager has made. They feel supported by her and are motivated to continue with the improvement plans.

p.3

Leaders and managers

The manager is using internal and external feedback from the children, staff and professionals to assess the effectiveness of the home. External feedback, however, has not been considered in the location risk assessment. The assessment is not responsive to the children’s previous incidents in the community. The manager has not fully explored how the local data can inform the staff’s practice. This reduces its effectiveness as a safeguarding tool. Assurance visit report: 2502918 4

p.3

Statutory requirements

This section sets out the actions that the registered person(s) must take to meet the Care Standards Act 2000, Children’s Homes (England) Regulations 2015 and the ‘Guide to the children’s homes regulations including the quality standards’. The registered person(s) must comply within the given timescales.

p.4

Requirement Due date

The protection of children standard is that children are protected from harm and enabled to keep themselves safe.

p.4

Requirement Due date

In particular, the standard in paragraph (1) requires the registered person to ensure— that staff—

p.4

Requirement Due date

assess whether each child is at risk of harm, taking into account information in the child’s relevant plans, and, if necessary, make arrangements to reduce the risk of any harm to the child;

p.4

Requirement Due date

have the skills to identify and act upon signs that a child is at risk of harm.

p.4

Requirement Due date

(Regulation 12 (1)(2)(a)(i)(iii)) 31/12/2020

p.4

Recommendations

 Provide a nurturing environment that is welcoming. (‘Guide to the children’s homes regulations including the quality standards’, page 15, paragraph 3.7) In particular, redecorate the den, keep the communal areas to a good standard and maintain the upkeep of the garden spaces.  The registered person is responsible for ensuring a record of supervision should be kept for staff, including the manager. The record should provide evidence that supervision is being delivered in line with regulation 33(4)(b). (‘Guide to the children’s homes regulations including the quality standards’, page 61, paragraph 13.3)  The registered person is responsible for ensuring that staff are familiar with the home’s policies on record keeping and understand the importance of careful, objective, and clear recording. (‘Guide to the children’s homes regulations including the quality standards’, page 62, paragraph 14.4) Assurance visit report: 2502918 5

p.4

Recommendations

In particular, ensure that records held at the home do not use derogatory terminology and are legible.  The registered person should review the appropriateness and suitability of the location and premises of the home at least once a year. The review should include the identification of any risks and opportunities presented by the home’s location and strategies for managing these. (‘Guide to the children’s homes regulations including the quality standards’, page 64, paragraph 15.1)

p.5

Children’s home details

Registered provider: Protea Care Limited

p.5

Children’s home details

Registered provider address: 317 Horn Lane, London W3 0BU

p.5

Inspector

Leemya McKeown, Social Care Inspector Assurance visit report: 2502918 6 to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.5

Inspector

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.6

Inspector

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.6

Inspector

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.6

Inspector

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.6

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion