Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Social care · Social care assurance visit

Hampden House

Inspected 30 Apr 2019 · URN SC024594

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Trish Palmer

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    30 Apr 2019

  • Inspectors verified

    Trish Palmer

  • Postcode verified

    CO10 2SF

  • Name on report verified

    Assurance visit

  • URN verified

    SC024594

Page 1 of 5
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−45Criticalmore positive than 23% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisesafe
Criticismconcerns

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionLeadership positive critical
  • Findings9w0
  • Leadership182w−45

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No next steps set out.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
5
Words of findings
191
shorter than usual (typical 479)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 51, typical 47
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
0
typical 4
Hedged sentences
17%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 1%Leadership 17%About the inspection 82%

Full report text

Assurance visit report: Chalk Hill 1 Chalk Hill Academy

p.1

Information about this residential special school

Chalk Hill is a residential special academy for boys aged between eight and 14 who have been permanently excluded or are at risk of permanent exclusion from mainstream school.

p.1

Information about this residential special school

The school is in a residential area of Sudbury, Suffolk. There are 30 pupils on roll, and up to 12 children can access the residential provision each weekday night.

p.1

Information about this residential special school

The head of the residential provision has been in post since 2015. She holds a diploma in social work and a registered manager’s award at level 4. She is currently undertaking a relevant level 5 qualification.

p.1

Information about this residential special school

The last residential inspection was in April 2019.

p.1

Information about this visit

Due to COVID-19 (coronavirus), Ofsted suspended all routine inspections in March 2020. As part of a phased return to routine inspection, we are undertaking assurance visits to children’s social care services that are inspected under the social care common inspection framework (SCCIF).

p.1

Information about this visit

At these visits, inspectors evaluate the extent to which:

p.1

Information about this visit

 children are well cared for  children are safe  leaders and managers are exercising strong leadership.

p.1

Information about this visit

This visit was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000, following the published guidance for assurance visits. Assurance visit report: Chalk Hill 2 Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills is leading Ofsted’s work into how England’s social care system has delivered child-centred practice and care within the context of the restrictions placed on society during the COVID-19 pandemic.

p.1

Findings from the visit

We did not identify any serious or widespread concerns in relation to the care or protection of children at this assurance visit.

p.2

The care of children

The residential provision closed in March 2020 in response to COVID-19 restrictions and reopened in September 2020. However, the residential provision closed again for two days in September due to staff shortages linked to staff who were self- isolating.

p.2

The care of children

The residential capacity has been reduced from 12 children to three children a night to maintain safe distancing measures.

p.2

The care of children

One child said that he is glad to be back at school and seeing his friends. He was able to explain about his ‘bubble’ and understands the restrictive measures. Another child said that it is strange staying at the school with the reduced numbers and that he misses all the other boys. Staff ensure that the children have plenty to do to occupy them and to reduce their anxieties.

p.2

The care of children

The children have continued to have secure relationships with staff. Staff have remained in contact with children during lockdown and the school holidays. Staff have visited children’s homes, using safe visiting protocols. They have taken food parcels to vulnerable children and delivered school work. This has helped to ensure that children are safe and well and that they have been able to continue their education remotely.

p.2

The care of children

Staff understand children’s social, emotional and mental health needs in relation to COVID-19 and the school closures. The staff understand the anxiety that some children may have returning to school. A clear transition plan for children returning to stay in the residential provision was well thought out and implemented. This provided support to children who felt anxious.

p.2

The care of children

Staff involve children in planning activities during their stay. The children have visited a local farm, been to the park and enjoyed swimming. These activities provided the children with social and leisure experiences that they had not been able to access during lockdown.

p.2

The safety of children

The staff used an effective process to identify children’s vulnerability and needs. Once identified, the staff planned home visits accordingly. The staff have Assurance visit report: Chalk Hill 3 implemented effective risk assessments for each child. These assessments identify triggers and de-escalation techniques that help children to manage and reduce risk- taking behaviours.

p.2

The safety of children

Residential staff have set clear boundaries and guidelines. These have helped children to feel safe and secure while staying away from home. Children understand the consequences of not sticking to these boundaries. School staff and residential staff work closely together, and this ensures that the children understand the expectations.

p.3

The safety of children

The school’s designated safeguarding lead (DSL) works closely with the academy’s safeguarding officer. The staff were able to report any safeguarding concerns to the DSL during lockdown and these were appropriately referred to social workers or other professionals.

p.3

Leaders and managers

The school’s staff have placed the well-being of children at the centre of their practice during the pandemic.

p.3

Leaders and managers

During the COVID-19 restrictions, senior leaders kept the day school open for most of the time. They considered the needs of the most vulnerable children and balanced these with guidelines and any parental concerns. Risk assessments, action plans and a flexible school curriculum were used to support children educationally and keep them safe.

p.3

Leaders and managers

Leaders and managers have ensured that the school has remained adequately staffed. The use of the residential staff in school and the closing of residential provision have meant that children’s education has not been overly disrupted.

p.3

Leaders and managers

Staff have undertaken extra training during lockdown, including managing trauma. This has supported them to have a better understanding of the anxieties and concerns that the children have faced during lockdown.

p.3

Leaders and managers

Since becoming part of an academy, the headteacher and senior leaders have held weekly video meetings with other schools in the academy group. This has supported the transition to academy status and enables good practice to be shared. Assurance visit report: Chalk Hill 4

p.3

Inspector

Trish Palmer, Social Care Inspector Assurance visit report: Chalk Hill 5 to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.4

Inspector

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.5

Inspector

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.5

Inspector

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.5

Inspector

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.5

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion