Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Gordon Franks Training Limited

Inspected — · published 6 Nov 2020 · URN 59227

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Postcode verified

    B7 4JE

  • Name on report verified

    Gordon Franks Training Limited

  • URN verified

    59227

Page 1 of 5
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−14Mixedmore positive than 17% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseindependent
Criticismlimited

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspection positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No next steps set out.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
5
Words of findings
20
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
—
Average sentence
7 words
Next steps
0
typical 5
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 2%About the inspection 98%

Full report text

Gordon Franks Training Limited Interim visit report

p.1

Name of lead inspector: Stuart Collett HMI

p.1

Type of provider: Independent learning provider

p.1

Address:

St James House St James’ Place Birmingham West Midlands B7 4JE Interim visit: Gordon Franks Training Limited, 13–14 October 2020

p.1

Context and focus of visit

On 17 March 2020, all routine inspections were suspended due to the COVID-19 (coronavirus) pandemic. As part of our phased return to routine inspections, we are carrying out ‘ interim visits ’ to further education and skills providers. Interim visits are to help learners, parents, employers and government understand how providers are meeting the needs of learners and apprentices in this period, including learners with high needs and those with special educational needs and/or disabilities. We intend to return to routine inspection in January 2021 but will keep the exact timing under review.

p.2

Context and focus of visit

The focus of these visits is on the themes set out below and the findings are based on discussions with leaders, managers, staff and learners.

p.2

Information about the provider

Gordon Franks Training, now known as GFT, is an independent learning provider based in the West Midlands offering apprenticeships and education programmes for young people, and traineeships. It was purchased by PQMS Ltd in February 2018, which itself was then acquired by the Hexatronic Group. At the time of the visit, there were 215 learners in learning. Education programmes for young people accounted for 14 learners, 21 learners were undertaking traineeships, and 180 learners were following apprenticeship programmes. The provider offers a mix of apprenticeship frameworks and standards, with the large majority of apprentices following a level 2 or level 3 framework in early years. The remaining apprentices study mainly customer service and business administration standards. A high proportion of learners have been excluded from school or college.

p.2

stakeholders and adapts to changed circumstances?

Leaders took steps to ensure that all learners were regularly contacted at the start of the pandemic. They issued detailed guidance to staff on the support learners should receive, and prioritised those following study programmes, where they anticipated that regular engagement would be a challenge.

p.2

stakeholders and adapts to changed circumstances?

During the period when providers were only open to some learners due to COVID-19 restrictions, almost half of learners following study programmes were not engaging in their learning. As a result, leaders arranged for staff to create paper-based resources for learners, as well as setting individual tasks for learners by email. Tutors reported regularly on learners’ engagement, which informed strategies for intervention with learners who were not participating in their learning. Interim visit: Gordon Franks Training Limited, 13–14 October 2020 Staff and learners received training in the use of digital tools for learning before the period of COVID-19 restrictions. Leaders invested in additional online resources for childcare apprentices and learners on study programmes.

p.2

stakeholders and adapts to changed circumstances?

Leaders used the flexibilities offered by some end-point assessment organisations to ensure that most apprentices due to complete their apprenticeship during the period of COVID-19 restrictions could do so. Some assessment has not taken place due to the need for face-to-face assessment, which cannot currently take place. Leaders are working with employers, learners and awarding bodies to ensure that the affected group of learners can complete their apprenticeship as soon as safely possible.

p.3

stakeholders and adapts to changed circumstances?

Leaders took the decision to resume face-to-face teaching on study programmes as soon as it was safe to do so. They found that engagement had improved as the period of remote learning continued. However, levels of engagement had remained significantly lower than prior to COVID-19 restrictions.

p.3

stakeholders and adapts to changed circumstances?

Stakeholder employers stated that leaders were quick to act to ensure that apprentices were able to continue learning online during the pandemic. They also told inspectors that the provider increased the level of pastoral support learners received.

p.3

the reasonable needs of learners?

Managers have worked with tutors of both study programmes and apprenticeships to ensure that learners have continued to be able to access their learning. They have been able to monitor learners’ progress through existing quality systems and have worked with tutors to amend the curriculum to suit the needs of learners. For example, apprentices have continued to have regular meetings with tutors through online conferencing platforms, and have been able to complete and submit written assignments during COVID-19 restrictions.

p.3

the reasonable needs of learners?

Managers identified strategies to help learners to catch up where they were falling behind with their learning. Tutors provided additional work and revised action plans, and gave additional flexible support. Managers reported that most learners were now back on track.

p.3

the reasonable needs of learners?

Leaders and managers have identified that a lack of work experience opportunities for learners following study programmes presents a significant barrier to learning in the current climate. They are investigating the possibility of hosting virtual opportunities at their premises to ensure that learners can develop the skills they will need in the workplace.

p.3

the reasonable needs of learners?

Tutors have provided extra support for learners while working remotely, particularly for those who have special educational needs and/or disabilities. This support has included regular contact for all learners, tailored to the method of communication Interim visit: Gordon Franks Training Limited, 13–14 October 2020 that learners prefer. For example, some learners are uncomfortable with video conferencing online, but respond well to communication through text messages or phone calls.

p.3

the reasonable needs of learners?

Tutors have identified that some apprentices produced more or higher quality work at home during COVID-19 restrictions. They said that learners attribute this to having more focused time to work, without the pressures of balancing their work role with their apprenticeship.

p.4

the reasonable needs of learners?

Managers have ensured that all learners have access to careers advice. A particular focus has been given to apprentices who have been made redundant as a result of the pandemic and learners following study programmes who reached the end of their programme during COVID-19 restrictions.

p.4

potential risks, including from online sources?

The designated safeguarding lead reported that they had undertaken additional safeguarding training. Senior leaders explained how they had been supported by their professional networks to address the challenges of the pandemic and had adapted their safeguarding policy and practice.

p.4

potential risks, including from online sources?

Leaders have provided training for staff on how to keep learners safe and how to record safeguarding issues and actions on the newly purchased database. They reported how they had worked closely with social workers to keep learners, particularly those in care or who are care leavers, safe and engaged.

p.4

potential risks, including from online sources?

Leaders told inspectors how they have worked hard to contact the most vulnerable learners and their parents. Managers and teachers explained how they have used repeated phone calls and emails to reassure themselves of the safety and well-being of these learners. Managers reported that they conducted a welfare survey in June. Managers and teachers reported how mental health first-aiders supported learners, particularly those with anxiety and feelings of isolation. Interim visit: Gordon Franks Training Limited, 13–14 October 2020 regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education

p.4

potential risks, including from online sources?

and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.5

potential risks, including from online sources?

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.5

potential risks, including from online sources?

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.5

potential risks, including from online sources?

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.5

potential risks, including from online sources?

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.5

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion