Early years · Early years complaint outcome
Childminder in Plymouth
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
5 Oct 2020
- URN verified
EY370757
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 2
- Words of findings
- 344
- about usual (typical 281)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 41, typical 42
- Average sentence
- 16 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 1
- Hedged sentences
- 14%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Summary of outcome
All early years providers must meet the legal requirements in the Statutory framework for the early years foundation stage . If we find that a provider is not meeting the requirements, we can take action to ensure they put matters right.
p.1
Summary of outcome
On 10 September 2020, we received concerns that the provider was not meeting some of these requirements.
p.1
Summary of outcome
On 23 September 2020, we carried out a regulatory visit. We found the provider was not meeting some of the requirements. We have served a welfare requirements notice. This is a legal notice that requires the provider to take the actions below within the timescales set out. The provider will be able to give parents further information about this.
p.1
Summary of outcome
improve knowledge and understanding of how to recognise, monitor and report any safeguarding concerns, including in the event of an allegation, in line with the Local Safeguarding Children Board procedures
p.1
Summary of outcome
improve knowledge of wider safeguarding matters, with particular regard to the 'Prevent' duty and female genital mutilation (FGM)
p.1
Summary of outcome
keep an accurate record of children's attendance.
p.1
Summary of outcome
At a visit on 13 October 2020 we found the provider had met some of the safeguarding and welfare actions but not others. She has improved her knowledge of how to identify and report child protection concerns, including through monitoring injuries and children's attendance. She has also demonstrated an understanding of female genital mutilation (FGM) . However, she has not fully met the welfare requirements notice regarding wider safeguarding matters. We have served another welfare requirements notice. The provider will be able to give parents further information about this.
p.1
Summary of outcome
improve knowledge and understanding of wider safeguarding matters, with particular regard to the 'Prevent' duty.
p.1
Summary of outcome
The provider is still registered with Ofsted.
p.1
Publication of complaints
We publish details of complaints made against childminders, home childcarers and childcare providers where we or the provider have taken action in order to meet legal requirements.
p.2
Publication of complaints
We publish details of complaints on our website for a period of five years.
p.2
Publication of complaints
For further information about the complaints process please view the Concerns and complaints about childminders and childcare providers leaflet .
p.2
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion