Early years · Early years complaint outcome
Hipperholme & Lightcliffe Day Nurseries Limited
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
30 Sept 2020
- URN verified
EY401758
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 2
- Words of findings
- 383
- longer than usual (typical 281)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 35, typical 42
- Average sentence
- 23 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 1
- Hedged sentences
- 12%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Summary of outcome
All early years providers must meet the legal requirements in the 'Statutory framework for the early years foundation stage', which you can find at www.gov.uk/government/publications/early-years-foundation-stage-framework--2 . If we find that a provider is not meeting the requirements, we can take action to ensure they put matters right. On 9 and 23 July and 17 August 2020 we received concerns that this provider was not meeting some of these requirements. On 28 August 2020, we carried out a regulatory visit. We found the provider was not meeting some of the requirements. We have issued a notice to improve which requires the provider to take the actions below within the timescale set out. The provider will be able to give parents further information about this. Actions needed by 28 September 2020:
p.1
Summary of outcome
-improve staffs knowledge and understanding of appropriate safeguarding children procedures, and in particular, actions to be taken if there are allegations made against staff, and the role of the local authority designated officer (LADO)
p.1
Summary of outcome
-improve support given to children with special educational needs, by having appropriate regard to the special educational needs and disability code of practice, improving the role of the SENCO in taking an active role in liaising with other professionals and agencies, and sharing relevant information about children.
p.1
Summary of outcome
The provider informed us that they have had two guest speakers attend the setting, including the Local Authority Designated Officer (LADO), to discuss with staff the role of the LADO and what happens when allegations are made against staff or volunteers. In addition, the provider has received both local and national safeguarding updates. The provider also informed us that management staff have met to review the support given to children with special educational needs, the special educational needs and disability code of practice and the role of the SENCO and staff team within the setting. We are satisfied with the actions taken by the provider and they are still registered with Ofsted.
p.1
Publication of complaints
We publish details of complaints made against childminders, home childcarers and childcare providers where we or the provider have taken action in order to meet legal requirements.
p.1
Publication of complaints
We publish details of complaints on our website for a period of five years. For further information about the complaints process please view the Concerns and complaints about childminders and childcare providers leaflet .
p.1
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion