Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
26 Aug 2020
- URN verified
EY437907
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 2
- Words of findings
- 347
- about usual (typical 281)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 41, typical 42
- Average sentence
- 18 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 1
- Hedged sentences
- 5%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Summary of outcome
All early years providers must meet the legal requirements in the Statutory framework for the early years foundation stage which you can find at www.gov.uk/government/publications/early-years-foundation-stage-framework--2 . If we find that a provider is not meeting the requirements, we can take action to ensure they put matters right.
p.1
Summary of outcome
On Monday 1 June 2020, we received concerns that this provider was not meeting some of these requirements. On 5 June 2020 we carried out a regulatory phone call to the provider. We found that the provider had taken appropriate action, including the implementation of a risk assessment and additional steps to ensure the premises were safe.
p.1
Summary of outcome
On 27 July 2020, we received further concerns that the provider was not meeting requirements. On 18 August 2020 we carried out an unannounced visit. We have sent the provider a notice to improve which asks the provider to take action. The provider will be able to give parents further information about this.
p.1
Summary of outcome
n ensure a record is kept of any complaints, along with the actions taken and the outcome
p.1
Summary of outcome
n keep accurate records of the names of children being cared for on the premises and their hours of attendance
p.1
Summary of outcome
n improve knowledge and understanding of your safeguarding policy and procedures, particularly the role of the local authority designated officer (LADO), allegation procedures and the local safeguarding partnership .
p.1
Summary of outcome
We found that the childminder had improved their knowledge and understanding of child protection procedures and fully understands their responsibilities. The childminder had implemented an appropriate complaints procedure and process for recording the names of children being cared for and their hours of attendance. We are satisfied the provider has met the safeguarding and welfare actions raised. The provider is still registered with Ofsted.
p.1
Publication of complaints
We publish details of complaints made against childminders, home childcarers and childcare providers where we or the provider have taken action in order to meet legal requirements.
p.1
Publication of complaints
We publish details of complaints for five years commencing on the date we complete our investigation.
p.2
Publication of complaints
For further information about the complaints process please view the Concerns and complaints about childminders and childcare providers leaflet .
p.2
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion