Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · Independent school inspection

The Serendipity School

Inspected 18 Aug 2020 · URN 131556

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Clive Dunn

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    18 Aug 2020

  • Inspectors verified

    Clive Dunn

  • Postcode verified

    SO19 6DS

  • Name on report verified

    The Serendipity School

  • URN verified

    131556

Page 1 of 9
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+75Very positivemore positive than 88% of reports of this type

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.

Praiseexemplaryexceptionallyoutstandingstrongindependentsafecompromisedknowledgeable
Criticismcompromise

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings956w+74
  • What needs to improve130w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
9
Words of findings
1,054
shorter than usual (typical 1813)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 44, typical 49
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
8
typical 8
Hedged sentences
3%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 53%What needs to improve 7%About the inspection 40%

Full report text

School material change inspection report

p.1

The Serendipity School 399 Hinkler Road, Thornhill, Southampton, Hampshire SO19 6DS

p.1

Main inspection findings

Part 3. Welfare, health and safety of pupils Paragraphs 7 [including paragraph 32(1) and 32(1)(c) from Part 6], 11, 12, 14 and 16  The school’s safeguarding policy takes account of the relevant guidance and is published on the school’s website. Leaders have ensured that the policy reflects the school’s context. For example, it sets out clear accountability and monitoring arrangements alongside detailed and precise contact details for all relevant people within and beyond the school.  The previous standard inspection found that all the school’s records relating to safeguarding were exemplary. Leaders’ oversight and honest self-review of their work in this area was praised. To this end, leaders have continued to refine and improve practice since that inspection. For example, they have found ways to further improve communication and sharpen record keeping, seeking the highest possible quality.  A new designated safeguarding lead has received the relevant training. The

p.1

Main inspection findings

headteacher and the school’s safeguarding monitoring group continue to keep a watchful eye that the policy and processes work as well as they should.  Existing policies and procedures for health and safety, fire safety and risk assessment are likely to continue to be fit for purpose given the proposed roll increase. The proprietor’s maintenance team is on hand to keep the premises in a good, safe condition. An external fire safety company has assessed the safe capacity of the premises to be in excess of the proposed roll and staffing. A wide range of written risk assessments shows a diligent and thorough approach. The risk assessment policy also emphasises the importance of ‘dynamic’ risk assessment in terms of staff taking responsibility for ongoing alertness and action to control or eradicate emerging risks.  Careful timetabling and a proposed increase to staffing are likely to ensure adequate supervision of pupils, risk assessed according to individual needs. Daily operational

p.1

Main inspection findings

planning procedures are in place to ensure that safety will not be compromised when pupils go off site for part of their curriculum.  The school is likely to meet all the paragraphs that were checked in this part if the material change is implemented.

p.1

Main inspection findings

Part 4. Suitability of staff, supply staff, and proprietors Paragraphs 17, 18, 19, 20 and 21  The proprietor’s human-resources department is responsible for processing the checks of the suitability of adults to work with pupils. However, the headteacher maintains oversight of the single central record and is knowledgeable about the associated arrangements and requirements. This includes checks of supply teachers and agency staff, and volunteers.  The single central record is complete and well organised. It goes beyond statutory requirements, recording other information relating to safer recruitment practices.  All requirements of these paragraphs are likely to continue to be met.

p.2

Main inspection findings

Part 5. Premises of and accommodation at schools Paragraphs 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28 and 29  The school has the space and facilities within its existing premises to accommodate an additional five pupils in a way that is unlikely to compromise the quality of education offered.  Rooms are well finished and maintained. They are suitably furnished for the intended purpose. Teaching spaces provide adequate space for the small groups the school operates, and communal spaces provide opportunities for pupils to socialise in larger groups, where appropriate. It is likely that there will be sufficient room to allow the school to continue to operate flexibly to meet the needs of individual pupils if the roll expands as proposed.  Outdoor spaces are attractively appointed, including the inviting sensory garden created by pupils. The grounds are large enough to accommodate additional pupils comfortably for recreation. Most physical education usually takes place off site.

p.2

Main inspection findings

 Other requirements of this part are also likely to continue to be met. For example, there are sufficient toilets for separate pupil and staff use. A dedicated room for the short-term care of sick or injured pupils meets requirements.  It is likely that the standards contained in this part will continue to be met.

p.2

Main inspection findings

Part 8. Quality of leadership in and management of schools Paragraph 34  The school has an exceptionally strong track record having been judged outstanding at three previous standard inspections. The most recent, in 2016, was under the leadership of the current headteacher.  The previous inspection found that school leaders carried out meticulous checks to ensure that the school complies with all the independent school standards. The proprietor and headteacher readily provided convincing evidence that all standards checked as part of this inspection were likely to be met.  Leaders have carefully considered how they can gradually increase the numbers on roll within the existing operation. They are mindful of the complexities that arranging individualised provision for a growing number of pupils can bring, including when pupils are off site or when staff are absent.  The headteacher is realistic about the challenges of recruiting suitable staff and has

p.2

Main inspection findings

already laid sensible foundations for these appointments.  The established structures and systems for the leadership and oversight of the school involve the proprietor and leaders at different levels. They are likely to support the school effectively through the transition period.  The sole director of the proprietorial body speaks regularly with investors, who do not have proprietorial responsibilities. However, there is the potential for them to become involved in governance matters, for example, through their inclusion in the whistle- blowing policy. In view of this, the proprietor recognises that it would be prudent to carry out a section 128 check to ensure relevant investors have not been prohibited from such work.  The standard contained within this part is likely to be met.

p.3

Compliance with regulatory requirements

The school is likely to meet the requirements of the schedule to the Education (Independent School Standards) Regulations 2014 (‘the independent school standards’) and associated requirements that are relevant to the material change.

p.4

School details

This inspection was carried out under section 162(4) of the Education Act 2002, the purpose of which is to advise the Secretary of State for Education about the school’s likely compliance with the independent school standards relevant to the material change that the school has applied to make.

p.5

School details

Type of school Independent special school

p.5

School details

School status Independent special school

p.5

School details

Email address info@serendipity-education.com

p.5

School details

Date of previous standard inspection 22–24 November 2016

p.5

recommendation

Age range of pupils 9 to 19 Not applicable Not applicable

p.5

recommendation

Number of pupils on the school roll 15 20 20

p.5

School’s current position School’s proposal

Gender of pupils Girls Not applicable Number of full-time pupils of compulsory school age 15 20

p.5

School’s current position School’s proposal

Number of part-time pupils 0 Not applicable

p.6

School’s current position School’s proposal

Number of pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities 15 20

p.6

School’s current position School’s proposal

Of which, number of pupils with an education, health and care plan 13 20

p.6

School’s current position School’s proposal

Of which, number of pupils paid for by a local authority with an education, health and care plan 13 20

p.6

School’s current position School’s proposal

Number of full-time equivalent teaching staff 5.5 6.5

p.6

Information about this school

 The Serendipity School caters for girls with severe and complex emotional and mental health needs. Most girls admitted to the school have experienced extreme trauma and are considered likely to benefit from a girls-only environment.  Pupils have typically been excluded from mainstream or other special schools and many have been out of education for some time. Nearly all pupils have an education, health and care (EHC) plan, and the majority are looked after by their local authorities. All pupils’ fees are paid for by a local authority, whether they have an EHC plan or not.  The previous full standard inspection on 22 to 24 November 2016 judged the school to be outstanding for the third consecutive time.  The sole director of The Serendipity Centre Ltd, the company named as proprietor, provides governance. He is in close contact with the school’s investors, who are not part of the proprietorial body.

p.6

Information about this school

 The school makes use of the following 10 providers as alternative part-time provision for pupils on roll: St Vincent College, Gosport; Totton College, Southampton; Havant and South Downs College, Waterlooville; Eastleigh College, Eastleigh; FLE Fishery, Romsey; Woodmill Canoeing and Outdoor Activity Centre, Southampton; Staunton Farm, Havant; Oarsome Chance, Leigh Park; Second Chance Children’s Charity, Titchfield; and Tender Loving Care (TLC), Sarisbury Green.

p.7

Information about this inspection

 The inspection was commissioned by the Department for Education (DfE) because the proprietor wished to change the school’s registration by increasing its capacity from 15 to 20 pupils. This was the first material change inspection.  This inspection was commissioned by the DfE during the COVID-19 (coronavirus) pandemic of 2020. Some of the inspection was conducted remotely to limit the time required on site and, consequently, avoid an overnight stay for the inspector.  Off site, the inspector reviewed documents sent electronically by the headteacher, relevant to the material change. On site, he had a tour of the premises and held discussions with the headteacher and proprietor. The inspector checked the single central register and sampled other safeguarding records.

p.8

Inspection team

Clive Dunn, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector guidance ‘Raising concerns and making a complaint about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/publications/complaints-about-ofsted . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.8

Inspection team

Parent View You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.

p.9

Inspection team

You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk , or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.gov.uk/ofsted .

p.9

Inspection team

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.9

Inspection team

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.9

Inspection team

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.9

Inspection team

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.9

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion