Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
20 Aug 2020
- URN verified
502186
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 2
- Words of findings
- 291
- about usual (typical 281)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 45, typical 42
- Average sentence
- 18 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 1
- Hedged sentences
- 0%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Summary of outcome
All early years providers must meet the legal requirements in the 'Statutory framework for the early years foundation stage', which you can find at www.gov.uk/government/publications/early-years-foundation-stage-framework--2 . If we find that a provider is not meeting the requirements, we can take action to ensure they put matters right.
p.1
Summary of outcome
On 10 August 2020, we received concerns that an allegation had been made against a member of staff and staff had not adhered to a parent request relating to their child's dietary requirements. We liaised with other agencies and discussed the information with the provider. We found that the provider had failed to notify Ofsted and other relevant agencies that an allegation had been made against a member of staff. On this occasion, we accepted that the provider had not intended to deceive Ofsted and the failure to notify was an oversight.
p.1
Summary of outcome
We found that the provider had taken prompt and effective action to prevent a re- occurrence. The action taken was to:
p.1
Summary of outcome
n conduct a thorough internal investigation and address the issues raised
p.1
Summary of outcome
n adopt new procedures to record any specific dietary requests and ensure members of staff adhere to these request.
p.1
Summary of outcome
We are satisfied with the action taken by the provider and no further action was required by Ofsted on this matter. The provider will be able to give parents further information about this. The provider is still registered with Ofsted.
p.1
Publication of complaints
We publish details of complaints made against childminders, home childcarers and childcare providers where we or the provider have taken action in order to meet legal requirements.
p.1
Publication of complaints
We publish details of complaints for five years commencing on the date we complete our investigation.
p.1
Publication of complaints
For further information about the complaints process please view the Concerns and complaints about childminders and childcare providers leaflet .
p.1
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion