Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
20 Aug 2020
- URN verified
EY308627
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- We discussed this breach with the provider and acknowledge that she had overlooked the requirement to notify Ofsted. p.1
- During the telephone discussion, we found that some staff did not understand the nursery's whistleblowing policy and failed to report concerns in a timely manner. p.1
- We telephoned the provider and found that she had failed to notify Ofsted of significant event. p.1
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 2
- Words of findings
- 304
- about usual (typical 281)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 45, typical 42
- Average sentence
- 18 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 1
- Hedged sentences
- 12%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Summary of outcome
All early years providers must meet the legal requirements in the 'Statutory framework for the early years foundation stage'. If we find that a provider is not meeting the requirements, we can take action to ensure they put matters right. On 9 July 2020, we received concerns that this provider was not meeting some of these requirements.
p.1
Summary of outcome
We telephoned the provider and found that she had failed to notify Ofsted of significant event. We discussed this breach with the provider and acknowledge that she had overlooked the requirement to notify Ofsted. The provider confirmed that she had taken prompt and effective action to tighten the nursery's safeguarding procedures. The action taken was to:
p.1
Summary of outcome
n make changes to their safeguarding policy and procedures, which now includes an explanation of the action to be taken in the event of an allegation being made against a member of staff (Child protection).
p.1
Summary of outcome
During the telephone discussion, we found that some staff did not understand the nursery's whistleblowing policy and failed to report concerns in a timely manner. As a result, we sent the provider a letter which asks her to take action. The provider will be able to give parents further information about this.
p.1
Summary of outcome
n ensure that all staff understand the nursery's safeguarding policy and procedures, with particular regard to whistleblowing, so that any issues about safeguarding can be addressed in a timely manner.
p.1
Summary of outcome
We are satisfied with the action taken. The provider remains registered with Ofsted.
p.1
Publication of complaints
We publish details of complaints made against childminders, home childcarers and childcare providers where we or the provider have taken action in order to meet legal requirements.
p.1
Publication of complaints
We publish details of complaints for five years commencing on the date we complete our investigation. For further information about the complaints process please view the Concerns and complaints about childminders and childcare providers leaflet .
p.1
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion