Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
10 Aug 2020
- URN verified
EY500153
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 1
- Words of findings
- 226
- shorter than usual (typical 317)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 40, typical 35
- Average sentence
- 17 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 8%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Summary of outcome
All early years providers must meet the legal requirements in the 'Statutory framework for the early years foundation stage', which you can find at www.gov.uk/government/publications/early-years-foundation-stage-framework--2. If we find that a provider is not meeting the requirements, we can take action to ensure they put matters right.
p.1
Summary of outcome
On 4 September 2019 we carried out an inspection and found the provider was not meeting some of the requirements of the early years foundation stage. The overall effectiveness of the provision was judged to be inadequate. We served a welfare requirement notice. This is a legal notice that requires the provider to take action. The inspection report sets out the actions the provider was required to take to meet the requirements.
p.1
Summary of outcome
The provider informed us of the steps taken to comply with the actions listed in the welfare requirement notice issued at the inspection. It was found that the provider had taken action by providing further training to staff, improving safety arrangements, updating the recruitment procedures and improving the key person arrangements. The provider had also reviewed the complaints procedure and improved the arrangements for the supervision and support for the staff team. We are satisfied the provider has met the safeguarding and welfare actions raised at the last inspection. The provider will be able to give parents further information about this. The provider is still registered with Ofsted.'
p.1
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion