Early years · Early years compliance action
Dreammaker Day Nursery
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
6 Aug 2020
- URN verified
EY289657
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 2
- Words of findings
- 284
- about usual (typical 317)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 48, typical 35
- Average sentence
- 18 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 6%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Summary of outcome
All early years providers must meet the legal requirements in the 'Statutory framework for the early years foundation stage', which you can find at www.gov.uk/government/publications/early-years-foundation-stage-framework--2 .
p.1
Summary of outcome
If we find that a provider is not meeting the requirements, we can take action to ensure they put matters right.
p.1
Summary of outcome
On 29 January 2020 we carried out an inspection and found the provider was not meeting some of the requirements of the early years foundation stage. The overall effectiveness of the provision was judged to be inadequate. We served a welfare requirement notice. This is a legal notice that requires the provider to take action. The inspection report sets out the actions the provider was required to take to meet the requirements.
p.1
Summary of outcome
On 13 February 2020 we visited the provider to check compliance with the actions listed in the welfare requirement notice issued at the inspection. It was found that the provider had taken action by improving the setting's vetting systems, so that people employed to work with children are suitable and that all staff receive induction training. The provider has also put appropriate arrangements in place for the supervision of staff. In addition, each child is assigned a key person and parents are informed about their child's learning experiences.
p.1
Summary of outcome
Risk assessments have improved and are carried out to ensure that children are not exposed to risks. We found that the provider has improved the premises and areas that children use and that they are now maintained to a suitable standard.
p.1
Summary of outcome
We are satisfied the provider has met the safeguarding and welfare actions raised at the last inspection.
p.1
Summary of outcome
The provider will be able to give parents further information about this. The provider is still registered with Ofsted.
p.1
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion