Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)
The Macclesfield Academy
Summary
Rachel Goodwin (lead), David Roberts, Dawn Platt, Elizabeth Haddock, Jon Ashley
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
11 Mar 2020
- Inspectors verified
David Roberts, Dawn Platt, Elizabeth Haddock, Jon Ashley, Rachel Goodwin
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Requires improvement
- Overall effectiveness verified
Requires improvement
- Personal development verified
Good
- Quality of education verified
Requires improvement
- Postcode verified
SK11 8JR
- Name on report verified
The Macclesfield Academy
- URN verified
137064
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2017.
- OverallRequires improvement
- Behaviour and attitudesGood
- Leadership and managementRequires improvement
- Personal developmentGood
- Quality of educationRequires improvement
15% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Requires improvement (5,043 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Requires improvement.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Staff know pupils well and are alert to the signs that a pupil may be at risk of harm. p.3
- Weaknesses in the curriculum have hampered leaders’ understanding of how to build pupils’ knowledge of subjects systematically. p.3
- Consequently, their ability to recall prior learning is weak. p.3
- Weaknesses in curriculum design mean that leaders at all levels do not understand the curriculum as the way of measuring pupils’ progress. p.4
- In many subjects, the sequencing of the curriculum is weak. p.4
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Some teachers have lower expectations of what pupils can and should achieve. p.2
- Leaders must ensure that all pupils have the opportunity to study a broad range of subjects at key stage 4, including modern foreign languages. p.4
- Leaders must ensure that the curriculum across all subjects is coherently planned and sequenced so that pupils can build sufficiently on prior learning. p.4
- In recent years, pupils in key stage 4 have not achieved as well as they should. p.2
- However, the flaws in the curriculum design at both key stages 3 and 4 mean that pupils do not achieve as well as they should across the full range of subjects. p.2
- In many subjects, leaders have not thought carefully enough about the content that they want pupils to learn and the order in which pupils should learn it. p.3
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Curriculum28
“The curriculum is insufficiently rich.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 1,176
- about usual (typical 1215)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 53, typical 56
- Average sentence
- 14 words
- Next steps
- 6
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 11%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of The Macclesfield Academy Park Lane, Macclesfield, Cheshire SK11 8JR
p.1
Inspection dates: 25 February–11 March 2020
p.1
Overall effectiveness Requires improvement
The quality of education Requires improvement Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Good Leadership and management Requires improvement Previous inspection grade Requires improvement 25 February–11 March 2020
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Relationships between staff and pupils are strong. Pupils feel happy and safe in the ‘tight-knit’ community of this small school. Most of the pupils with whom we spoke said that teachers help them when they need it.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Leaders ensure that differences between people are celebrated. Pupils said that bullying does not happen very often. They are confident that when it does occur, teachers will deal with it effectively. Pupils value the work of the anti-bullying ambassadors.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Corridors and social spaces are calm and well supervised. Pupils are mostly polite and respectful of adults and of each other. Most pupils behave sensibly and safely. They generally behave well in lessons.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Currently, the curriculum lacks ambition for pupils. Some teachers have lower expectations of what pupils can and should achieve. Although improving, pupils’ achievement has been limited by a flawed curriculum. In recent years, pupils in key stage 4 have not achieved as well as they should.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
The school’s wider curriculum helps to develop pupils’ confidence, resilience and independence. Many pupils greatly appreciate the vast opportunities offered, such as the Duke of Edinburgh’s Award and taking part in school productions.
p.2
better?
For many years, leaders have provided a curriculum that is not in the best educational interests of the pupils at The Macclesfield Academy. The curriculum that pupils have experienced has not been well planned. Over time, it has led to a fluctuation in how well pupils achieve.
p.2
better?
Despite the issues with the curriculum, some pupils attain well in some subjects in their GCSE examinations. Also, the progress that pupils made between key stages 2 and 4 in 2019 was an improvement on the previous year. However, the flaws in the curriculum design at both key stages 3 and 4 mean that pupils do not achieve as well as they should across the full range of subjects.
p.2
better?
The curriculum at both key stages 3 and 4 lacks sufficient depth and ambition for all pupils. For example, in subjects such as English, pupils do not study a full novel at key stage 3. The curriculum is insufficiently rich. This affects disadvantaged pupils in particular. The headteacher has a clear understanding of how to strengthen the curriculum. However, several leaders, including some governors, need further support to understand the rationale for curriculum change.
p.2
better?
That said, under the direction of the headteacher, leaders are in the process of broadening the curriculum offer so that all pupils study a wider range of subjects in 25 February–11 March 2020
p.2
3
Year 9. Added to this, the number of pupils following the English Baccalaureate suite of subjects is increasing. However, not all pupils have the option to study a modern foreign language at key stage 4. Many of these pupils are disadvantaged. Some pupils with whom we spoke said that they find this unfair.
p.3
3
Weaknesses in the curriculum have hampered leaders’ understanding of how to build pupils’ knowledge of subjects systematically. In many subjects, leaders have not thought carefully enough about the content that they want pupils to learn and the order in which pupils should learn it. This is hindering pupils’ ability to build their knowledge over time. In subjects such as history, pupils at key stage 4 have experienced significant gaps in their learning. Consequently, their ability to recall prior learning is weak.
p.3
3
Teachers have high expectations of pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND). They use the information that they have about pupils with SEND effectively. This ensures that these pupils have access to the same curriculum as their peers. Pupils with SEND are supported well with their learning.
p.3
3
Leaders have worked hard to improve pupils’ attendance. All pupils, including those who are disadvantaged and those with SEND, attend regularly. Much is done to keep pupils’ attendance high. Similarly, leaders’ expectations of behaviour are high. Despite the reservations of some pupils about behaviour in lessons, inspectors observed positive attitudes towards learning.
p.3
3
Leaders have prioritised pupils’ wider development. By devoting weekly curriculum time to enrichment activities, leaders have made sure that all pupils, including those who are disadvantaged, benefit from an array of vibrant opportunities. For example, pupils can choose from a diverse range of clubs such as Japanese language and film, and drama in the community.
p.3
3
The headteacher has the support of staff, parents, carers and the wider community. He has the best interests of the pupils at heart. Staff appreciate support for their well-being.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.
p.3
Safeguarding
All staff take pupils’ welfare seriously. They meet regularly to discuss strategies to keep vulnerable pupils safe. Staff know pupils well and are alert to the signs that a pupil may be at risk of harm. Leaders work well with external agencies. They take appropriate action to ensure that pupils and their families get the help that they need.
p.3
Safeguarding
Pupils have a good understanding of the different risks that they face. They know how to keep safe when using the internet and particularly on social networking sites. 25 February–11 March 2020
p.3
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
For too long, leaders and governors have not acknowledged that the current curriculum model lacks sufficient ambition for pupils. Decisions about the curriculum have not always been taken in pupils’ best educational interests. Some pupils are precluded from taking a modern foreign language as a GCSE. Leaders are in the process of reviewing and changing the curriculum offer for September 2020. They should ensure that this new curriculum model is sufficiently ambitious for all pupils. Leaders must ensure that all pupils have the opportunity to study a broad range of subjects at key stage 4, including modern foreign languages. Weaknesses in curriculum design mean that leaders at all levels do not understand the curriculum as the way of measuring pupils’ progress. In many subjects, the sequencing of the curriculum is weak. Pupils are unable to recall prior learning. Consequently, too many pupils have significant gaps in their
p.4
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
knowledge. Leaders must ensure that the curriculum across all subjects is coherently planned and sequenced so that pupils can build sufficiently on prior learning. Flaws in the curriculum structure mean that in many subjects, leaders have not carefully considered the key knowledge that pupils need to embed into their long- term memory. This means that pupils are not remembering important information over time. Leaders must ensure that they are clear about what they want pupils to learn, the order in which they will learn it and how they will help pupils to remember this knowledge long term.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
You can use to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school, or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use Ofsted Parent View information when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
If you are the school and you are not happy with the inspection or the report, you can complain to Ofsted .
p.4
Further information
You can search for published performance information about the school.
p.4
Further information
In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 25 February–11 March 2020
p.4
School details
Inspection number 10121989 Type of school Secondary
p.5
School details
Chair of governing body Alistair Sutcliffe
p.5
School details
Website http://www.macclesfieldacademy.org/
p.5
School details
Date of previous inspection 11–12 October 2017, under section 5 of the Education Act 2005
p.5
Information about this school
The school uses alternative provision for a small number of pupils at Cheshire Alternative Provision School, Fermain Academy, Cre8 and Project Inc.
p.5
Information about this inspection
We carried out this inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.5
Information about this inspection
Due to concerns about COVID-19 (coronavirus), following the return of a school trip to Italy, the inspection was paused on 25 February 2020. It was then completed on 10 and 11 March 2020 in agreement with school leaders. During the inspection, we met with the headteacher, other members of the senior leadership team, middle leaders and a wide range of teaching and support staff. We also met with five members of the governing body, including the chair and vice-chair of governors. We also met with the school improvement partner. We met with pupils from key stage 3 and key stage 4 to discuss their views about school life. We reviewed a wide range of documentation, including the school’s self- evaluation and improvement plans, subject leaders’ curriculum plans, attendance 25 February–11 March 2020
p.5
6
and behaviour records, bullying logs and the procedures in place to keep pupils safe. We checked the arrangements for pupils attending alternative provision. We considered the 75 responses to Ofsted’s pupil questionnaire and the 28 responses to Ofsted’s online survey for staff. We also checked the views of the 143 parents who responded to Ofsted’s online survey, Parent View, including the comments received via the free-text facility. We did deep dives in the following subjects: English, mathematics, science and history. We met with subject leaders for each of these subjects, visited lessons, looked at pupils’ work and spoke with pupils and teachers. We also considered other subjects during the inspection.
p.6
Inspection team
Rachel Goodwin, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector
p.6
Inspection team
Jon Ashley Ofsted Inspector 25 February–11 March 2020
p.6
7
regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.7
7
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.7
7
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.7
7
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.7
7
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion