Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

Hanson School

Inspected 4 Mar 2020 · published 3 Jul 2020 · URN 107440

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    4 Mar 2020

  • Inspectors verified

    David Pridding, Julian Appleyard, Liz Cresswell, Louise Greatrex, Michael Cook

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Inadequate

  • Leadership and management verified

    Inadequate

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Inadequate

  • Personal development verified

    Requires improvement

  • Quality of education verified

    Requires improvement

  • Postcode verified

    BD2 1JP

  • Name on report verified

    Hanson School

  • URN verified

    107440

Page 1 of 9
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2018.

  • OverallInadequate
  • Behaviour and attitudesInadequate
  • Leadership and managementInadequate
  • Personal developmentRequires improvement
  • Quality of educationRequires improvement

3% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Inadequate (5,043 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−4Mixedmore positive than 79% of reports of this type graded Inadequate
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisestrongeffectiveeffectivelystrengthstrengthswell plannedhappypositive
Criticismfalling behindweaknessestoo manyat riskinsufficienttoo oftennot alwaysnot strong

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1456w−6
  • Safeguarding132w+12

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
9
Words of findings
1,550
about usual (typical 1552)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 55, typical 53
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
6
typical 6
Hedged sentences
10%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 60%Safeguarding 5%About the inspection 35%

Full report text

Inspection of Hanson School Sutton Avenue, Swain House Road, Bradford, West Yorkshire BD2 1JP

p.1

Overall effectiveness Inadequate

The quality of education Requires improvement Behaviour and attitudes Inadequate Personal development Requires improvement Leadership and management Inadequate Sixth-form provision Requires improvement Previous inspection grade Requires improvement 3–4 March 2020

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Many pupils feel happy and safe at Hanson School. However, they talk about crowded corridors and some pushing. They like the fact that there are staff in the corridors to help maintain order. Most pupils behave well and have positive attitudes in lessons. However, a sizeable minority of pupils do not regularly follow the school rules. Of the pupils who inspectors talked to, most told us that bullying is not common. Leaders are working hard to improve attendance, but a significant number of pupils still do not come to school often enough.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils, including disadvantaged pupils and pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND), do not achieve as well as they should. They are falling behind other pupils in the country who have similar starting points.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Staff support and encourage pupils with SEND. However, not all teachers make use of the information they are given about the learning needs of these pupils. The Additionally Resourced Centre (ARC), which supports visual and hearing-impaired pupils, is a strength of the school.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Many pupils enjoy the wide range of sports available to them. An increasing number are taking part in the Duke of Edinburgh’s Award programme.

p.2

better?

Since 2011, when the school first received an academy order, there has been involvement from three multi-academy trusts. Since September 2019, the local authority has begun to take steps to improve the school. It is too soon to see the impact of this, particularly on pupils’ behaviour and attendance. Disadvantaged pupils and pupils with SEND do not achieve as well as they should. Pupils’ achievement in English and humanities has been consistently low. Pupils’ achievement in mathematics is in line with the national average.

p.2

better?

Leaders are aware that pupils are not remembering important knowledge. As a result, curriculum leaders are starting to plan the curriculum to make sure that pupils know and remember more. Leaders are changing the way learning is planned so that pupils use the knowledge they have already acquired to help them understand their work. However, this is more effective in some subjects than in others. In mathematics and computer science, learning plans follow on from each other in a sensible way. This is not the case in all subjects. For example, in science, some topics are not structured in a way to help pupils build and remember knowledge. Similarly, the limited curriculum time allocated to history and geography has led to some issues. Consequently, teachers only have time to cover some topics from the national curriculum in these two subjects in a superficial way.

p.2

better?

Leaders are aware that attendance is low and too many pupils are frequently absent from school. Despite their efforts, leaders have not been able to make any real 3–4 March 2020

p.2

3

improvement in overall attendance since the previous inspection. The situation in relation to exclusions from school is similar. When compared with similar schools across the country, the number of exclusions is high. Too many pupils are excluded on more than one occasion. Leaders are aware that they have not won the hearts and minds of a sizeable minority of pupils. Leaders have recently launched the ‘Outreach Programme’, with the support of the local authority, to try to engage these pupils. It is too early to see whether this project is having the desired impact.

p.3

3

Leaders are aware that the curriculum should make a strong contribution to pupils’ personal development. The personal, social, health and economic education programme is well planned. Pupils can remember important information from topics covered in these lessons. These include e-safety, bullying, drugs, self-esteem and knife crime. However, the time pupils spend with form tutors is less well used. Careers education is an emerging strength. The majority of pupils go on to further education, employment or training when they leave school.

p.3

3

There has not been the stability and consistency of governance to support the school in moving forward. This means that the school has not improved. Since his involvement with the school, the present headteacher has worked with four different governing bodies and five chairs of governors. The recently appointed chair of governors is very experienced in the role in other schools. Governors are now clearer about the strengths and weaknesses of the school.

p.3

3

Overall, students do not make the progress that they should in the sixth form on A- level and applied courses. However, the learners who need to improve GCSE grades in English and mathematics, do make strong progress. Teachers in subjects such as psychology and sociology are effective in planning the delivery of their subjects. This is not consistent across subjects. Leaders are aware of the strengths and weaknesses of the sixth form. They have made changes, but it is too early to see the real impact of these changes. Teachers and the sixth-form team provide effective support for learners, who particularly value the one-to-one subject sessions.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.3

Safeguarding

Lead safeguarding staff know what they are doing. The school’s systems are set up to spot when pupils might be at risk. Staff are trained in safeguarding and know what to look out for. When extra help is needed, safeguarding leaders get in touch with the right people in other organisations. For example, the school has strong links with the local authority’s children’s services and the police.

p.3

Safeguarding

Leaders make sure that pupils are well informed about risks to their safety. The curriculum helps pupils to recognise when they might be vulnerable.

p.3

Safeguarding

The register that records checks on all adults in school is thorough and compliant 3–4 March 2020

p.3

4

with legal requirements. Pre-employment checks make sure that adults the school employs are suitable to work with children.

p.4

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 There is insufficient time allocated in key stage 3 to allow pupils to cover the national curriculum subjects in depth. As a result, pupils are covering some aspects of the national curriculum in a superficial way. Leaders should identify exactly where subject content has been narrowed and take action to ensure that pupils study subject content in depth.  Subject leaders are at different stages of curriculum planning and implementation. Consequently, there is variability in the extent to which the curriculum is coherently planned and ordered across subjects. Leaders should enable subject leaders and teachers to construct a curriculum which is coherently planned and sequenced, so that pupils acquire sufficient knowledge and skills for future learning and employment across all curriculum areas.  Leaders have not used pupil premium funding effectively to improve outcomes for disadvantaged pupils. Consequently, disadvantaged pupils have not achieved as

p.4

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

well as their peers. Their attendance is not strong and they are more likely to be excluded. Leaders must ensure that the forthcoming pupil premium review happens and that they act promptly on the recommendations.  A significant number of pupils do not attend school as they should. As a result, they are missing a sizeable proportion of their education and falling behind. Leaders and governors should ensure that the focus on improving attendance is evaluated effectively and remains a priority. They should improve the attendance of all pupils and ensure that strategies are in place to improve the attendance of pupils who are regularly absent from school.  Some pupils are excluded too often because of their behaviour. As a result, they are missing a significant part of their education and falling behind. Leaders should evaluate the effectiveness of the school’s behaviour management approaches and take any necessary steps to reduce the number of pupils who are repeatedly

p.4

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

internally or externally excluded.  Teachers do not use the information provided about pupils with SEND to successfully meet the needs of these pupils. As a result, pupils with SEND have not made the progress they could have made or have incurred behaviour sanctions, which could have been avoided. Leaders must check regularly that all teachers meet the needs of pupils with SEND.  Form tutors do not always make maximum use of the two hours per week allocated to form time. This means that vital curriculum time is wasted. Leaders must ensure that this key part of the personal development curriculum is planned and implemented effectively and monitored rigorously.  Leaders have not checked well enough which pupils are participating in which aspects of the school’s extra-curricular offer. As a result, they do not have a clear 3–4 March 2020

p.4

5

picture of whether all groups of pupils are benefiting from activities that broaden the curriculum. Leaders need to check this regularly to ensure that all groups, including the disadvantaged and pupils with SEND, are benefiting from the offer.

p.5

How can I feed back my views?

or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use Ofsted Parent View information when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.5

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.5

How can I feed back my views?

If you are the school and you are not happy with the inspection or the report, you can complain to Ofsted .

p.5

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.5

Further information

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 3–4 March 2020

p.5

School details

Inspection number 10124216 Type of school Secondary comprehensive

p.6

provision

Number of pupils on the school roll 1,636

p.6

sixth form

Appropriate authority The governing body

p.6

sixth form

Website http://www.hansonacademy.org.uk/

p.6

sixth form

Date of previous inspection 10–11 January 2018, under section 5 of the Education Act 2005

p.6

Information about this school

 The school is a larger than average sized secondary school.  The Department for Education (DfE) made an order to change Hanson School into an academy in 2011, after Ofsted first put the school into special measures in November 2010. The DfE has not implemented the academy order, and Hanson School is not yet an academy.  Hanson School came out of special measures in February 2013 but went into special measures again in February 2015. The school has been in special measures for six of the past 10 years. During that time, the regional schools commissioner brokered support from three academy trusts and the school has had five headteachers. The partnership with The Gorse Academies Trust (TGAT) started in March 2017. The regional schools commissioner’s service level agreement with TGAT to support Hanson School continued until July 2019. 3–4 March 2020

p.6

7

 The governing board replaced the interim executive board in March 2017. The three representatives from TGAT left the governing board in July 2019.  The current headteacher joined the school in April 2016. The governing board appointed him as substantive headteacher in February 2017.  The school hosts Bradford’s ARC for pupils who are deaf, hearing impaired or with vision impairment. There are currently 43 pupils, from the wider Bradford area, who are supported by this provision. They are on the school roll, integrated into the school and follow a normal timetable. All pupils who attend ARC also receive additional specialist support and teaching. The Bradford Council Sensory Service, based in Hanson School, provides the specialist teaching and support.  The school provides alternative provision for pupils at The Stephen Longfellow Academy, Prism, J.A.M.E.S. Project and Bradford College.

p.7

Information about this inspection

We carried out this inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.7

Information about this inspection

In accordance with section 44(2) of the Education Act 2005, Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector is of the opinion that this school requires significant improvement, because it is performing significantly less well than it might in all the circumstances reasonably be expected to perform.

p.7

Information about this inspection

 We met with a wide range of staff, including the headteacher and other members of the senior leadership team. We also met with subject leaders, two governors, including the vice-chair of the governing board, and had a telephone conversation with the new chair of governors. The lead inspector met with the local authority school improvement partner and the deputy director for education.  To evaluate the quality of safeguarding, we spoke with pupils and staff and met safeguarding leaders. Safeguarding paperwork was reviewed. Discussions focused on how the school keeps pupils safe. The single central record was checked.  We spoke to newly qualified teachers, administrative staff, a lunchtime supervisor and a supply teacher to check their views on pupils’ behaviour and attitudes.  An inspector had telephone conversations with the manager of two of the alternative providers used by the school.  We considered responses to Ofsted’s online questionnaires. This included the staff

p.7

Information about this inspection

survey (72 responses), Parent View (22 responses) and the free-text responses to Parent View (18 responses). There were no responses to the pupil survey.  We undertook deep dives into the following subjects: English, science, history, mathematics, geography and computer science. This involved meetings with subject leaders and joint visits with leaders to a sample of lessons in these subjects. We also looked at books and other work produced by pupils from the lessons visited. Leaders joined us for this activity. We had discussions with teachers and groups of pupils from the lessons visited. In addition, visits to lessons in other subjects were carried out. 3–4 March 2020

p.7

Inspection team

David Pridding, lead inspector Ofsted Inspector

p.8

Inspection team

Louise Greatrex Ofsted Inspector 3–4 March 2020

p.8

9

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.9

9

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.9

9

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.9

9

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.9

9

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.9

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion