Summary
Emma Gregory (lead), Deborah Bailey, Iain Sim, Jonathan Smart, Mark Cocker
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
4 Mar 2020
- Inspectors verified
Deborah Bailey, Emma Gregory, Iain Sim, Jonathan Smart, Mark Cocker
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Requires improvement
- Leadership and management verified
Requires improvement
- Overall effectiveness verified
Inadequate
- Personal development verified
Good
- Quality of education verified
Inadequate
- Postcode verified
M23 9BP
- Name on report verified
Manchester Health Academy
- URN verified
135875
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.
- OverallInadequate
- Behaviour and attitudesRequires improvement
- Leadership and managementRequires improvement
- Personal developmentGood
- Quality of educationInadequate
3% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Inadequate (5,043 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- However, there remain too many weaknesses in how subject curriculums are delivered across the school. p.2
- As a result, too many pupils with SEND submit work of a poor quality and underachieve considerably at the end of key stage 4. p.3
- There are inconsistencies in how well teachers help pupils to overcome misconceptions and address the gaps in 3–4 March 2020 p.2
- For instance, leaders in English and geography have only started to address key weaknesses very recently. p.2
- Leaders’ systems to check on and develop this aspect of the sixth form have been ineffective. p.3
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Staff understand the procedures that they must follow if they have concerns about a pupil. p.4
- Leaders must act urgently to ensure that teachers have the information they need to meet the needs of pupils with SEND. p.4
- Teachers must expect the best of all pupils so that they can achieve the high academic standards of which they are capable. p.4
- Leaders must act to ensure that pupils and students attend school regularly and to reduce the proportion who are regularly absent. p.5
- Far too many pupils have not gained the qualifications that they need to be successful. p.2
- The information that teachers receive does not focus enough on how they should adapt the curriculum to meet the needs of these pupils. p.3
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 8
- Words of findings
- 1,540
- about usual (typical 1552)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 56, typical 53
- Average sentence
- 14 words
- Next steps
- 6
- typical 6
- Hedged sentences
- 12%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of Manchester Health Academy Moor Road, Wythenshawe, Greater Manchester M23 9BP
p.1
Overall effectiveness Inadequate
The quality of education Inadequate Behaviour and attitudes Requires improvement Personal development Good Leadership and management Requires improvement Sixth-form provision Inadequate Previous inspection grade Good 3–4 March 2020
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils are beginning to learn more than they have in the past. Teachers are starting to raise their expectations of pupils. However, pupils and students at this school have not achieved well for far too long. This is especially the case for disadvantaged pupils and pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND).
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
The pupils and students whom we spoke with told us that they feel safe in school. They describe the school as a happy place and they are positive about the recent improvements in behaviour. However, a minority of pupils have concerns about the behaviour on the school’s busiest corridors. Others told us that their learning in lessons is sometimes disrupted, but that this is not commonplace.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Although pupils’ attendance has started to improve, too many pupils and students do not attend school regularly. They miss out on vital learning.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Mostly, pupils and students told us that bullying is dealt with swiftly. They are confident that there is someone to talk to if they have any concerns.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils appreciate the wide variety of clubs on offer, such as those for sports, cooking and drama. They value visits from guest speakers to learn about careers. They enjoy the various trips that are organised to enhance their learning.
p.2
better?
Pupils have underachieved considerably in their GCSE examinations in many subjects, including English, mathematics and science. Far too many pupils have not gained the qualifications that they need to be successful. This is especially the case for disadvantaged pupils and pupils with SEND.
p.2
better?
Subject curriculums in the past have not been challenging enough for pupils to achieve well. Leaders are introducing more demanding curriculums across the school. These curriculums build effectively on what pupils learn at primary school. This is starting to have a positive effect on pupils’ learning in some subjects, such as mathematics. However, much of this work remains in its infancy. Changes to the curriculum have not had enough impact on the quality of education for many pupils. For instance, leaders in English and geography have only started to address key weaknesses very recently.
p.2
better?
In some subjects, leaders have considered carefully the order in which pupils learn about different topics in some year groups. For example, leaders in music ensure that younger pupils understand important subject vocabulary. In art, teachers ensure that older pupils can build well on earlier learning. However, there remain too many weaknesses in how subject curriculums are delivered across the school.
p.2
better?
Many older pupils have large gaps in their knowledge. There are inconsistencies in how well teachers help pupils to overcome misconceptions and address the gaps in 3–4 March 2020
p.2
3
their learning. In mathematics, leaders have introduced systems to help teachers address pupils’ errors. When these are used well, they are highly effective at helping pupils to overcome their mistakes. That said, some teachers do not use these systems properly. As a result, some pupils’ errors are not rectified and they struggle with new learning.
p.3
3
In the sixth form, those students who did not achieve standard passes or higher in their mathematics and English GCSE examinations do not receive appropriate support. There is time set aside for students to develop and improve their mathematics and English. However, some students explained to us that they do not attend these sessions. We found this to be the case. Leaders’ systems to check on and develop this aspect of the sixth form have been ineffective. Leaders and those responsible for governance had made the decision to close the sixth form prior to this inspection.
p.3
3
The learning of too many pupils and students is hampered by their absence from school. This is especially the case for disadvantaged pupils. There are some signs of recent improvement in this area. However, pupils’ attendance remains below the national average. In the sixth form, students’ attendance over a recent two-week period was particularly concerning.
p.3
3
Leaders do not ensure that teachers have enough information to meet the needs of pupils and students with SEND. The information that teachers receive does not focus enough on how they should adapt the curriculum to meet the needs of these pupils. Some teachers do not have high enough expectations of what this group of pupils can achieve. As a result, too many pupils with SEND submit work of a poor quality and underachieve considerably at the end of key stage 4. Pupils with SEND are more likely to be excluded from school than their peers for incidents of poor behaviour.
p.3
3
Most pupils and students behave well, both during lessons and around school. Many pupils are polite and courteous. However, pupils explained to us that a minority of pupils ‘mess about’ and that this gets in the way of their learning. This is particularly the case when they have a temporary teacher.
p.3
3
Pupils benefit from a well-designed health curriculum. Leaders have considered this content carefully. It is delivered by subject specialists and it helps pupils to keep themselves safe and healthy. For example, pupils learn about the dangers of legal highs, alcohol misuse and knife crime. Pupils also learn how to administer first aid. Pupils learn about faiths and cultures that are different from their own through the ethics curriculum. Mostly, pupils are tolerant and respectful. They understand and respect the differences that exist in their community.
p.3
3
Leaders ensure that pupils and students benefit from a well-planned careers programme. Pupils and students value opportunities to learn from meaningful work experience. Most pupils and students remain in education, employment or training when they leave the school. 3–4 March 2020
p.3
4
Leaders and governors are aware of those aspects of the school that require significant improvement. For instance, leaders have already worked to address the weaknesses in pupils’ literacy skills. The senior leadership team has been strengthened. Subject leaders are becoming more effective in their roles. There are signs that governors are providing a higher level of challenge to leaders than they have done in the past. Staff told us that leaders are considerate of their well-being and workload.
p.4
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.
p.4
Safeguarding
Leaders complete all necessary recruitment checks on staff. Staff receive regular safeguarding training. For example, they have recently had training about the possible signs of radicalisation. Staff understand the procedures that they must follow if they have concerns about a pupil. Leaders ensure that vulnerable pupils receive appropriate help. This includes support from a wide range of other agencies.
p.4
Safeguarding
Pupils learn how to keep themselves safe. For instance, they have recently learned about the dangers of drug misuse and how to stay safe online. Through the health curriculum, pupils also learn how to look after their own mental health.
p.4
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
Leaders have been unable to make enough improvements to the progress that pupils make between key stages 2 and 4. Pupils, including disadvantaged pupils and those with SEND, do not achieve well in their GCSE examinations. This means that they are less likely to succeed in the next stage of education, employment or training. Leaders should build on the recent developments to the curriculum so that it has a greater impact on pupils’ achievement and enables pupils to be more successful. Leaders do not routinely provide teachers with high-quality information about pupils with SEND. This means that teachers do not have the information that they need to adapt the curriculum for this group of pupils. Leaders must act urgently to ensure that teachers have the information they need to meet the needs of pupils with SEND. Some teachers do not have high enough expectations for what pupils with SEND can achieve. As a result, many of these pupils submit work that is incomplete or
p.4
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
poor in quality. Teachers must expect the best of all pupils so that they can achieve the high academic standards of which they are capable. Leaders have not ensured that subject curriculums are delivered consistently well. Some teachers do not routinely address pupils’ errors and misconceptions. Nor do they address gaps in pupils’ knowledge effectively. This means that some pupils struggle to apply their knowledge to new learning. Leaders must ensure that 3–4 March 2020
p.4
5
teachers use assessment systematically to identify and address pupils’ misconceptions and help pupils to overcome the large gaps in their learning. Too many pupils and students are regularly absent from school. This is especially the case for disadvantaged pupils. This means that they miss out on important learning. Leaders must act to ensure that pupils and students attend school regularly and to reduce the proportion who are regularly absent.
p.5
How can I feed back my views?
or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use Ofsted Parent View information when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.
p.5
How can I feed back my views?
The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.
p.5
How can I feed back my views?
If you are the school and you are not happy with the inspection or the report, you can complain to Ofsted .
p.5
Further information
You can search for published performance information about the school.
p.5
Further information
In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 3–4 March 2020
p.5
School details
Inspection number 10087676 Type of school Secondary
p.6
sixth form
Website www.manchesterhealthacademy.org.uk
p.6
sixth form
Date of previous inspection 28–29 April 2015
p.6
Information about this school
A new principal has been appointed since the previous inspection. The principal was appointed in September 2017. Two new vice-principals have also taken up their roles since the principal’s appointment. The school uses alternative provision for a small number of pupils at Manchester Secondary Pupil Referral Unit, EdStart, Broadstones and Music Stuff Education.
p.6
Information about this inspection
We carried out this inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.6
Information about this inspection
In accordance with section 44(2) of the Education Act 2005, Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector is of the opinion that this school requires significant improvement, because it is performing significantly less well than it might in all the circumstances reasonably be expected to perform. 3–4 March 2020
p.6
7
During the inspection, we spoke with pupils and staff. As the lead inspector, I spoke with the vice-chair of the local governing body. I spoke on the telephone with another representative from the governing body. I also spoke on the telephone with two representatives from the local authority. We considered a range of school documents, including leaders’ assessment of the school’s strengths and weaknesses, and documents relating to governance. We checked leaders’ information about pupils’ behaviour, exclusions and attendance. We also considered leaders’ information about pupils with SEND. We spoke with representatives of some of the alternative providers used by the school. We looked at leaders’ records of appointment checks on staff and other documents relating to safeguarding. We considered 46 responses to Ofsted’s questionnaire for staff and 65 responses to Ofsted’s questionnaire for pupils. We considered the views expressed by
p.7
7
parents and carers in the 243 responses to Ofsted’s online survey, Parent View, including the 36 comments received via Ofsted’s free-text facility. As part of the inspection, we did deep dives in the following subjects: geography, science, mathematics, art and English. In these subjects, we spoke with pupils, teaching staff and subject leaders. We checked pupils’ work and visited lessons. Other subjects were also considered as part of this inspection, including history, Spanish, ethics and music.
p.7
Inspection team
Emma Gregory, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector
p.7
Inspection team
Jonathan Smart Senior Her Majesty’s Inspector 3–4 March 2020
p.7
8
regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.8
8
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.8
8
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.8
8
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.8
8
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.8
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion