Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

University of Reading

Inspected 12 Mar 2020 · published 29 Jun 2020 · URN 133870

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Patricia Collis

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    12 Mar 2020

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Patricia Collis

  • Postcode verified

    RG6 6UR

  • Name on report verified

    University of Reading

  • URN verified

    133870

Page 1 of 5
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

0Mixedmore positive than 24% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspection positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No next steps set out.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
5
Words of findings
20
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
—
Average sentence
7 words
Next steps
0
typical 5
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 2%About the inspection 98%

Full report text

University of Reading Monitoring visit report

p.1

Name of lead inspector: Patricia Collis, Ofsted Inspector

p.1

Type of provider: Higher education institution

p.1

Address:

University of Reading Whiteknights Reading Berkshire RG6 6UR Monitoring visit: University of Reading, 11-12 March 2020

p.1

Context and focus of visit

From October 2018, Ofsted undertook to carry out monitoring visits to all newly directly funded providers of apprenticeship training provision which began to be funded from April 2017 or after by ESFA and/or the apprenticeship levy. This monitoring visit was undertaken as part of those arrangements and as outlined in the ‘Further education and skills inspection handbook’, especially the sections entitled ‘Monitoring visits’ and ‘Monitoring visits to providers that are newly directly publicly funded’. The focus of these visits is on the themes set out below.

p.2

Context and focus of visit

University of Reading, through their Henley Business School, runs a programme of higher- and degree-level apprenticeships from level 5 to level 7. The apprentices within the scope of this visit are 179 apprentices on the level 5 operations departmental manager standard apprenticeship. Managers stopped recruiting apprentices onto a programme run by the university in March 2019, but 33 apprentices remain on this programme. The first cohort of apprentices recruited onto a new subcontracted partner programme started in November 2019, and this has 146 apprentices.

p.2

Reasonable progress

Leaders have a sound strategic intention for the apprenticeship programme that they offer. It forms a natural extension to the university’s longstanding tradition of delivering business qualifications. Henley Business School’s leaders view apprentices as ‘productivity drivers’, who contribute to their strategy to improve the economic performance of the companies with which they work.

p.2

Reasonable progress

Leaders use the Henley Business School’s international reputation to develop strong and effective relationships with employers, such as large retail groups and the NHS. They communicate their expectations effectively, so that employers know what their commitment should be. If an employer cannot meet these expectations, leaders will not agree an apprenticeship programme. As a result, they recruit apprentices with integrity and meet the requirements of an apprenticeship programme.

p.2

Reasonable progress

Leaders and managers have developed an appropriate curriculum, which enables apprentices to become associates of the Chartered Management Institute, while Monitoring visit: University of Reading, 11-12 March 2020 studying. This gives them access to management networks and additional training events outside their workplaces and the university.

p.2

Reasonable progress

Leaders and managers know the strengths and weaknesses of their provision well. They make well-considered decisions, such as ceasing the recruitment of apprentices onto the university’s programme and using a subcontracted partnership for all future apprenticeships.

p.3

Reasonable progress

Leaders’ oversight and management of the subcontracted arrangements are appropriate. Staff have developed good communication between the university, employer and subcontractor. They monitor apprentices’ progress through weekly meetings.

p.3

Reasonable progress

Leaders and managers have been too slow in developing the arrangements for a small minority of apprentices who need to take their English and mathematics qualifications. Consequently, these apprentices will not complete their apprenticeships within the planned timescale.

p.3

Reasonable progress

Leaders and managers do not always benefit from scrutiny by professionals who have apprenticeship experience. As a result, quality assurance processes such as their self-assessment lack the evaluative judgements that leaders will need in order to maintain a high-quality programme.

p.3

Reasonable progress

Staff ensure that apprentices who are new to management develop new knowledge, skills and behaviours. Apprentices gain confidence as they practise their new skills in the workplace and receive positive feedback from their line managers.

p.3

Reasonable progress

Staff plan a curriculum which they order logically. It enables apprentices to identify their existing skills and develop new skills and behaviours. These start with self- awareness and operational management topics and end with a project relevant to their businesses.

p.3

Reasonable progress

Tutors have good subject knowledge and relevant experience. They use their knowledge to plan meaningful on- and off-the-job activities with apprentices. Apprentices analyse their current practice and identify their next steps. Consequently, apprentices have a significantly positive impact on the teams they manage and their businesses. One apprentice and her team have received a nomination for ‘team of the year’ by their employer.

p.3

Reasonable progress

The apprentices who learn with the subcontractor benefit from easily accessible online resources. They use these to research, submit work and check their progress Monitoring visit: University of Reading, 11-12 March 2020 against agreed targets. Apprentices produce work of the appropriate standard. Tutors mark work promptly. Apprentices receive useful feedback so that they know how to improve their work and gain higher grades.

p.3

Reasonable progress

Tutors prepare apprentices thoroughly for their final assessments. Tutors introduce professional discussion of management topics in sessions. This increases apprentices’ confidence in reflecting accurately on their growing abilities.

p.4

Reasonable progress

Apprentices recruited to the first university-run programme struggled to consolidate knowledge into their long-term memories. This was because theory sessions were too close together, and there was insufficient time to practise their skills in the workplace. Consequently, almost half left the apprenticeship.

p.4

Reasonable progress

The remaining apprentices on the university programme receive helpful support to complete their qualification. Almost all will now complete, but not within the planned timescale. Apprentices on the subcontracted programme are making good progress.

p.4

Reasonable progress

Leaders ensure that apprentices are safe. Although leaders have adequate safeguarding procedures in place, they have rightly started to improve their policies and how they work with the human resources department of the university.

p.4

Reasonable progress

Leaders for both the university and the subcontractor apply safer recruitment practices. The designated safeguarding leads are appropriately qualified, and all staff have completed relevant safeguarding and ‘Prevent’ duty training. Managers carry out Disclosure and Barring Service checks, but they do not always update them in line with the university’s safeguarding policy.

p.4

Reasonable progress

Apprentices feel safe both at work and during training activities. Staff and apprentices have guidance about to whom they should report concerns. However, this guidance has not been tested. Apprentices know whom to report concerns at work.

p.4

Reasonable progress

Although the university has a ‘Prevent’ duty action plan, it does not identify the local threats that apprentices may face. Monitoring visit: University of Reading, 11-12 March 2020 regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.4

Reasonable progress

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.5

Reasonable progress

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.5

Reasonable progress

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.5

Reasonable progress

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.5

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion