Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)
Horton CofE VA Primary School
Summary
Jen Southall (lead), Steve Wigley
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
4 Mar 2020
- Inspectors verified
Jen Southall, Steve Wigley
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Good
- Early years verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Good
- Overall effectiveness verified
Good
- Personal development verified
Good
- Quality of education verified
Good
- Postcode verified
BS37 6QP
- Name on report verified
Horton CofE VA Primary School
- URN verified
109262
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2013.
- OverallGood
- Behaviour and attitudesGood
- Early yearsGood
- Leadership and managementGood
- Personal developmentGood
- Quality of educationGood
66% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Good (5,043 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- All staff are strong role models and have high expectations of pupils and themselves. p.2
- As a result of this strong provision, children in Reception are well prepared for Year 1. p.2
- The previous ‘outstanding’ judgement reflected the school’s overall effectiveness in June 2013 under the relevant inspection framework at that time. p.1
- The long time between inspections is because the law changed in 2011; it made outstanding schools exempt from routine inspection. 3–4 March 2020 p.1
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Pupils who are at risk of falling behind are identified quickly and given the extra support they need to allow them to catch up. p.3
- However, attendance is not as good as it should be and falls below the national average. p.3
- The new executive headteacher has been swift in identifying what needs to be done to improve the quality of education for pupils at Horton. p.2
- However, they acknowledge that, while improving, a few pupils do not attend as often as they should. p.4
- Leaders need to ensure that pupils are able to successfully apply and link their knowledge and understanding across relevant subjects. p.4
- Leaders need to ensure that the robust strategies they now have in place secure better attendance for all pupils. p.4
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Progress & outcomes5
“Consequently, these pupils achieve well.” p.3
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 1,176
- about usual (typical 1098)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 60, typical 55
- Average sentence
- 14 words
- Next steps
- 6
- typical 4
- Hedged sentences
- 5%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of Horton CofE VA Primary School Horton, Chipping Sodbury, Bristol BS37 6QP
p.1
Overall effectiveness Good
The quality of education Good Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Good Leadership and management Good Early years provision Good Previous inspection grade Outstanding
p.1
Overall effectiveness Good
The previous ‘outstanding’ judgement reflected the school’s overall effectiveness in June 2013 under the relevant inspection framework at that time.
p.1
Overall effectiveness Good
The new judgement of ‘good’ reflects the current inspection framework as well as any changes at the school since the last inspection.
p.1
Overall effectiveness Good
The school has not been inspected for over six years, which is longer than the five- year maximum interval between inspections. Changes in school effectiveness may have happened at any point in that period. The long time between inspections is because the law changed in 2011; it made outstanding schools exempt from routine inspection. 3–4 March 2020
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Horton is a school where the ethos of compassion, forgiveness and honesty shines through. Pupils appreciate all that the school has to offer, describing it as ‘belonging to a giant family’. Staff put pupils’ happiness at the heart of all they do as they strive to ensure that pupils meet their full potential.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Horton offers pupils a calm and peaceful place to learn. The school is built on mutual trust and respect. Pupils’ behaviour in lessons and at social times is of a high standard. All staff are strong role models and have high expectations of pupils and themselves. As a result, pupils are motivated to work hard in their lessons.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
During the inspection, we spoke with lots of the pupils. They told us that they enjoy school and spoke excitedly about the many trips and visits which bring learning alive , for example school trips to the Cardiff museum to see Dippy, and Aerospace Bristol.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils are confident that they are kept safe. They are adamant that bullying does not exist in their school. This view is also shared by parents. Nonetheless, pupils know the action to take if bullying was to occur.
p.2
better?
The new executive headteacher has been swift in identifying what needs to be done to improve the quality of education for pupils at Horton. As the head of St John’s Mead, she uses the schools’ partnership to best effect, sharing good practice to achieve the best outcomes for pupils. Parents and carers appreciate the approach of leaders. All parents and carers who responded to the online survey would recommend the school.
p.2
better?
Together with the staff, there is an urgency of improvement which pervades the school. Leaders, including governors, know that pupils’ achievement is not as high as they would like. Improvements put in place are strengthening pupils’ achievement, most notably in reading, writing and mathematics.
p.2
better?
Children in Reception are well supported. This allows them to get off to a strong start. Transition arrangements from nursery are effective and children soon settle. The curriculum is well designed and excites the children. For example, they spoke with animation about their visit to forest school. Children described in detail how they were making spiders out of clay, using twigs that needed to be the same length to make the legs. As a result of this strong provision, children in Reception are well prepared for Year 1.
p.2
better?
Staff focus on teaching early reading skills from the moment children enter the school. Staff are well trained and have the skills to teach phonics effectively. The recent implementation of a new phonics programme is having a positive effect on securing the necessary reading skills. This enables children to move on to reading 3–4 March 2020
p.2
3
books which match the sounds they know. Many pupils soon become fluent and confident readers. Pupils who are at risk of falling behind are identified quickly and given the extra support they need to allow them to catch up.
p.3
3
Pupils demonstrate a love of reading and read every day both at school and home. Teachers read to pupils every day. They read books that excite and support pupils’ understanding across the subjects they study. For example, pupils in Years 5 and 6 are reading ‘The Highwayman’ which supports their understanding of their history topic.
p.3
3
The school’s curriculum is strong. It covers the national curriculum well and is enhanced by a wide range of clubs, including archery, creative writing and music. The organisation of the curriculum enables pupils to build on what they already know, understand and can do. Pupils understand what they are learning and why. They enjoy their learning and behave well in lessons. Pupils listen carefully and engage in their learning. They are inquisitive and ask pertinent questions. This means that, typically, they can remember what they have learned. However, pupils are not always able to link their learning across other subjects, for example how what they have learned in geography links to their history work.
p.3
3
Leaders carefully check the achievement of pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND). The leader for SEND is knowledgeable. She has the expertise to provide guidance to staff. This support enables them to successfully support the pupils who need additional help. Lessons are well constructed, and tasks appropriately modified. Consequently, these pupils achieve well.
p.3
3
There are strong relationships between home and school. Parents understand the importance of their children’s education. Most pupils attend school every day. However, attendance is not as good as it should be and falls below the national average.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.
p.3
Safeguarding
Staff receive regular updates on safeguarding in line with current legislation. They know what to do if they have any anxieties or doubts about the welfare of a child. This knowledge and confidence minimises risk to pupils and keeps them safe. Leaders have a strong focus on ensuring that pupils’ good emotional and mental health is a high priority in their work to safeguard pupils. Parents who responded to the online survey, Parent View, value the care and help their children receive. Pupils are confident that they are well looked after and kept safe. 3–4 March 2020
p.3
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
Leaders are working hard to make sure pupils attend school regularly. However, they acknowledge that, while improving, a few pupils do not attend as often as they should. Leaders need to ensure that the robust strategies they now have in place secure better attendance for all pupils. Leaders have designed a curriculum which is well planned. They are aware of the remaining adjustments needed. Leaders need to ensure that pupils are able to successfully apply and link their knowledge and understanding across relevant subjects.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use Ofsted Parent View information when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
If you are the school and you are not happy with the inspection or the report, you can complain to Ofsted .
p.4
Further information
You can search for published performance information about the school.
p.4
Further information
In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 3–4 March 2020
p.4
School details
Appropriate authority The governing body
p.5
School details
Date of previous inspection 20–21 June 2013
p.5
Information about this school
The school works in a formal partnership with St John’s Mead CE VC Primary School with a headteacher shared across both schools, known as the executive headteacher at Horton. There has been a significant turnover of staff since the last inspection, including changes in headteacher.
p.5
Information about this inspection
We carried out this inspection under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. We deemed the inspection a section 5 inspection under the same Act.
p.5
Information about this inspection
The previous ‘outstanding’ judgement reflected the school’s overall effectiveness in June 2013 under the relevant inspection framework at that time.
p.5
Information about this inspection
The new judgement of ‘good’ reflects the current inspection framework as well as any changes at the school since the last inspection.
p.5
Information about this inspection
The school has not been inspected for over six years, which is longer than the five- year maximum interval between inspections under section 5 of the Education Act 3–4 March 2020
p.5
6
2005. Changes in school effectiveness may have happened at any point in that period. The long time between inspections is because the law changed in 2011; it made most outstanding schools exempt from routine inspection.
p.6
6
We held meetings with the headteacher, deputy headteacher, subject leaders, the leader with responsibility for pupils with SEND, and teaching and support staff. We also met with groups of pupils to seek their views. The lead inspector held a meeting with two governors, including the chair. The lead inspector spoke on the telephone with an education adviser from South Gloucestershire’s Children’s Services. We examined a range of documentation provided by the school, including the school’s self-evaluation document, the school’s development plan and documentation relating to behaviour. There was a focus on ensuring that pupils are safe. Inspectors scrutinised training records, tested staff’s safeguarding knowledge, and spoke with pupils about their safety and well-being. The lead inspector also met with the designated safeguarding lead. We reviewed the school’s provision in reading, writing, mathematics and history.
p.6
6
This included visiting lessons, looking at pupils’ work, meeting with senior leaders and holding discussions with staff and pupils. We observed pupils’ behaviour at various times during the day and reviewed attendance information. We reviewed 22 responses to the online survey, Parent View.
p.6
Inspection team
Jen Southall, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector
p.6
Inspection team
Steve Wigley Ofsted Inspector 3–4 March 2020
p.6
7
regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.7
7
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.7
7
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.7
7
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.7
7
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion