Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)
Mary Elton Primary School
Summary
Stewart Gale (lead), Jayne Keller, Jen Edwards
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
5 Mar 2020
- Inspectors verified
Jayne Keller, Jen Edwards, Stewart Gale
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Good
- Early years verified
Requires improvement
- Leadership and management verified
Requires improvement
- Overall effectiveness verified
Requires improvement
- Personal development verified
Requires improvement
- Quality of education verified
Requires improvement
- Postcode verified
BS21 7SX
- Name on report verified
Mary Elton Primary School
- URN verified
143991
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.
- OverallRequires improvement
- Behaviour and attitudesGood
- Early yearsRequires improvement
- Leadership and managementRequires improvement
- Personal developmentRequires improvement
- Quality of educationRequires improvement
15% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Requires improvement (5,043 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Senior leaders and governors have been too slow to tackle weaknesses. p.2
- There are too many weaknesses in the school’s reading and phonics programme. p.4
- Nevertheless, weaknesses in the school’s curriculum and how it is implemented prevent many pupils from reaching the standards they are capable of. p.2
- The school’s strategy for pupils with SEND is weak. p.3
- The strategy to support pupils with SEND is not good enough. p.4
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Leadership & governance12
“Senior leaders and governors have been too slow to tackle weaknesses.” p.2SEND & inclusion8
“The school’s strategy for pupils with SEND is weak.” p.3
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 1,214
- about usual (typical 1215)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 59, typical 56
- Average sentence
- 16 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 12%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of Mary Elton Primary School Mary Elton Primary School, Holland Road, Clevedon, North Somerset, Somerset BS21 7SX
p.1
Overall effectiveness Requires improvement
The quality of education Requires improvement Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Requires improvement Leadership and management Requires improvement Early years provision Requires improvement
p.1
Overall effectiveness Requires improvement
Previous inspection grade Not previously inspected under section 5 of the Education Act 2005 4–5 March 2020
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils behave well throughout the day, including in lessons. They like the school’s 5Cs rules (curious, critical thinkers, collaborative, courageous and creative), which help them think about how to behave. As a result, pupils are keen to help each other. They are polite and kind. A highlight for many is having a hot chocolate on Fridays with Mr Hudd, as a reward for being a 5C champion.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Bullying is rare. Pupils told us that staff are quick to help if pupils are ever unhappy. Pupils like school and most want to achieve well, including in the Reception Year.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Nevertheless, weaknesses in the school’s curriculum and how it is implemented prevent many pupils from reaching the standards they are capable of. This includes pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND). Too many pupils who have fallen behind do not receive the help they need to catch up quickly, including in reading and mathematics. This stops some pupils from being as well prepared for the next stage in their education as they should be.
p.2
better?
Since joining the Clevedon Learning Trust (CLT) in April 2017, leaders have dealt with many challenges, including a staff restructure which took effect from September 2019. There are many leaders who are new in post, including the subject leaders for mathematics, English and phonics. Senior leaders and governors have been too slow to tackle weaknesses. This has led to a decline in the quality of education, including in the Reception Year. However, leaders now have an accurate understanding of the main areas for improvement. There is still much more to do to make sure that all pupils, particularly those who need to catch up or with SEND, can achieve consistently well.
p.2
better?
Leaders have started to review what they expect pupils to know in each subject, and by when. In some subjects, such as in art and science, this is going well. Teachers sequence lessons effectively so that pupils gain knowledge well over time. Pupils apply prior knowledge to help them with their current learning. For example, in art, Year 5 pupils produce high-quality work based on printing techniques started in Year 4 (Roman mosaics). However, this is not a consistent picture. Other subjects, including mathematics and geography, are not designed coherently. As a result, pupils find it hard to recall knowledge or use this well. For example, pupils in Year 1 struggle to compare cities in polar regions to the United Kingdom because they do not have a deep enough understanding of either area. In mathematics, pupils do not practise previous knowledge or revisit what they know about numbers often enough.
p.2
better?
This means some pupils struggle to build their mathematical knowledge or apply it well enough.
p.2
better?
Pupils enjoy reading. They like to read on many occasions during the day. Teachers read a high-quality book to the pupils in every class, such as ‘Wolf Brother’ in Year 6. 4–5 March 2020
p.2
3
Teachers also link reading to topic work. However, leaders do not have an agreed approach for teaching daily reading. Teachers in different year groups do different things to teach reading. This means pupils’ daily reading experiences are too variable, with much that is not good. Teachers do not check what pupils know, or need to learn next, well enough. This includes some pupils who need to catch up, or with SEND.
p.3
3
The school has an agreed daily phonics programme, starting with children in the Reception Year. However, some pupils are held back, or confused, when they are given books to read containing sounds or words they do not know. This leads to some pupils struggling to read too many words on a page. As a result, pupils’ enjoyment, confidence and fluency to read well are affected.
p.3
3
The school’s strategy for pupils with SEND is weak. Sometimes reviews for pupils with SEND take too long. Targets and ongoing support for pupils, particularly in reading, are not matched precisely enough to pupils’ needs. As a result, some pupils with SEND do not achieve well. This affects how well pupils are prepared for the next stage in their education, including children in the Reception Year.
p.3
3
Leaders ensure that pupils have many experiences through educational trips, visits and clubs. Pupils enjoy having important jobs to help around school, such as working in the office or gate duty. These roles give pupils a sense of purpose and develop important personal and social skills for the future. Pupils have a keen interest in the world around them. Links with a partner school in Tanzania provide high-quality opportunities for pupils to learn about other people and cultures. The annual STEM (science, technology, engineering and mathematics) project motivates pupils to take action for local, national and global issues. Pupils are taught to be thoughtful and caring citizens. For example, pupils have recently decided to purchase a plot of rainforest in response to this year’s work on deforestation.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.
p.3
Safeguarding
Leaders take appropriate action to check staff, volunteers and visitors before they work with pupils. Staff are vigilant and aware. They are well trained and know what to do to keep pupils safe. Leaders work well with other organisations, including social care and health professionals, to care for pupils who need their support.
p.3
Safeguarding
Pupils feel safe. They know what to do in different situations to stay safe, such as when they are using the internet. Pupils know how to take responsibility for their own safety in school. 4–5 March 2020
p.3
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
From Reception to Year 6, in many subjects the curriculum is not planned or designed sufficiently to enable pupils to acquire deep knowledge. As a result, pupils have gaps in their knowledge, including in reading and mathematics. Leaders need to ensure that pupils build knowledge and skills at the right time, so that all pupils can achieve well. There are too many weaknesses in the school’s reading and phonics programme. These prevent pupils from reading fluently and confidently, particularly those who need to catch up. Leaders must ensure that a coherent reading and phonics programme is implemented, with accurate assessment to ensure that all pupils learn to read well, including in the Reception Year. The strategy to support pupils with SEND is not good enough. This means pupils do not achieve as well as might reasonably be expected. Leaders must ensure that a robust programme is implemented so that every pupil with SEND can
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use Ofsted Parent View information when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
If you are the school and you are not happy with the inspection or the report, you can complain to Ofsted .
p.4
Further information
You can search for published performance information about the school.
p.4
Further information
In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 4–5 March 2020
p.4
School details
Inspection number 10133458 Type of school Primary
p.5
School details
Date of previous inspection Not previously inspected
p.5
Information about this school
Mary Elton Primary Academy converted to become an academy school on 1 April 2017. When its predecessor school, Mary Elton Primary School, was last inspected by Ofsted, it was judged to be good overall.
p.5
Information about this inspection
We carried out this inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005. 4–5 March 2020
p.5
6
We worked with many leaders during the course of the inspection. These included the headteacher, the deputy headteacher, the English and phonics leaders, curriculum leaders (mathematics, science, art and geography) and the SENCo. We also met with representatives of the local governing board, including the chair of the governing board. The lead inspector also met with the chief executive officer (CEO), the chair of the trust board, the school’s link trustee and the director for school improvement. We scrutinised the school’s safeguarding records, including the single central record, and evaluated the effectiveness of the school’s safeguarding procedures. This involved talking to staff and pupils about their understanding of safeguarding, bullying, and health and safety. We undertook deep dives in these subjects: reading and phonics, geography, art, mathematics and science. This involved visiting lessons, talking to pupils, looking
p.6
6
at pupils’ work and talking to teachers. We checked Parent View (Ofsted’s online survey) and took account of these views during the inspection. We also considered any additional views provided through letters that we received. As a result, we scrutinised the school’s handling of complaints and the implementation of the complaints policy. We also checked the staff and pupils’ surveys and took full account of these during inspection activities.
p.6
Inspection team
Stewart Gale, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector
p.6
Inspection team
Jen Edwards Ofsted Inspector 4–5 March 2020
p.6
7
regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.7
7
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.7
7
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.7
7
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.7
7
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion