Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

St Clare's Catholic Primary School

Inspected 26 Feb 2020 · URN 107325

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Requires improvement

Jean Watt (lead), Catherine Precious

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    26 Feb 2020

  • Inspectors verified

    Catherine Precious, Jean Watt

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Good

  • Early years verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Good

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Requires improvement

  • Personal development verified

    Good

  • Quality of education verified

    Requires improvement

  • Postcode verified

    BD2 3JD

  • Name on report verified

    St Clare’s Catholic Primary School

  • URN verified

    107325

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2016.

  • OverallRequires improvement
  • Behaviour and attitudesGood
  • Early yearsGood
  • Leadership and managementGood
  • Personal developmentGood
  • Quality of educationRequires improvement

15% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Requires improvement (5,043 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+37Positivemore positive than 74% of reports of this type graded Requires improvement
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseeffectiveeffectivelystrongpositiveenjoyvery wellambitiouscaring
Criticismconcernsat riskpoortoo lownot consistentlystrugglebelowharm

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1107w+52
  • Safeguarding92w−25
  • What needs to improve28w—

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
1,192
about usual (typical 1215)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 59, typical 56
Average sentence
12 words
Next steps
6
typical 5
Hedged sentences
9%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 60%Safeguarding 5%What needs to improve 2%About the inspection 34%

Full report text

Inspection of St Clare’s Catholic Primary School Fagley Road, Fagley, Bradford, West Yorkshire BD2 3JD

p.1

Overall effectiveness Requires improvement

The quality of education Requires improvement Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Good Leadership and management Good Early years provision Good Previous inspection grade Good 25–26 February 2020

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

St Clare’s Catholic Primary is an inclusive, caring and nurturing school. Pupils say that they feel part of a family. Staff place pupils’ well-being at the heart of all they do. They ensure that pupils are well cared for. Pupils say that they feel safe. There is very little bullying. When it does happen, staff effectively deal with it.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

The new headteacher has made lots of positive changes. The environment is calm and orderly. Pupils behave well. However, since the last inspection, the quality of education which pupils receive has not been good enough. This is particularly the case in key stage 2. More recently, there have been improvements in pupils’ achievement, particularly in key stage 1 and the early years. Children in Reception get off to a strong start.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

The Catholic ethos supports pupils’ personal development well. Leaders aim to develop pupils as well-rounded individuals. Pupils experience a wealth of opportunities to learn both in and out of the classroom. They relish taking part in activities such as residentials, fundraising and visits to care homes for the elderly. They are keen and confident to talk about what they are learning.

p.2

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

Since the last inspection, there have been many changes in staffing. These have resulted in a period of instability. However, the school now has a stable staff team and strong leadership. Everyone is working to achieve the same aim. In key stage 2, pupils’ achievement has been too low. The new senior leadership team have brought about significant improvements. The quality of education which pupils receive is improving. Parents, carers and staff welcome these changes.

p.2

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

Leaders have rightly prioritised improving pupils’ reading. Adults teach phonics well. The programme for teaching phonics is suitably ambitious for all pupils, including those with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND). The books which pupils read are well matched to the sounds they are learning. Children who struggle to read receive effective help so that they are not left behind. Leaders have invested in a wide range of books to promote a love of reading. Pupils enjoy reading.

p.2

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

In mathematics, leaders and staff are clear about what pupils should learn and by when. They have ensured that sequenced plans of expected knowledge are in place. Teachers are well trained in how to teach mathematics. Pupils are knowing and remembering more in mathematics. Teachers make sure that pupils with SEND get the extra help they need. However, the most able pupils are not consistently given work that challenges them so that they build on their prior learning.

p.2

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

In science, leaders have planned a sequenced curriculum. Pupils have learned important scientific vocabulary over time. They can use this knowledge to explain what they have learned. In other subjects, leaders have not given the same careful thought to planning the curriculum. S ome teachers do not cover the curriculum that 25–26 February 2020

p.2

3

leaders have devised, for example in history. This means that pupils do not learn all that they should in the right order. At times, p upils learn disconnected facts which they do not remember over time.

p.3

3

Leaders promote pupils’ personal development very well. The Catholic virtues of the school have a positive influence on pupils’ development. Activities such as careers workshops are carefully planned to develop pupils’ aspirations. Pupils and parents appreciate the opportunities to work alongside each other to learn about different careers. Staff support pupils’ mental health well. Pupils enjoy the well-being sessions where they take part in activities such as meditation.

p.3

3

In the early years, children are happy and safe. They cooperate and play well together. The early years curriculum is well thought out. This helps children to develop early reading skills right from the start. Well selected mathematical resources help children to practise counting and recognise numbers. As a result, children are well prepared for key stage 1. Parents value the support they receive to help their children learn.

p.3

3

Pupils behave well in class. Most attend school regularly. However, some pupils do not attend as often as they should. Pupils’ attendance remains below the national average. Leaders have a range of plans to improve attendance, including working with families. This is an ongoing area for development.

p.3

3

Governors have successfully managed a period of instability in the school’s leadership team. They provide effective challenge and support to school leaders. Staff are proud to work at the school. They know that the leaders care about their workload and well-being.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.3

Safeguarding

Leaders and governors ensure that safeguarding is top priority. The link governor for safeguarding works very effectively to check the work of school leaders. Leaders make sure that staff receive frequent safeguarding updates in weekly briefings. Staff are well trained to spot signs that a pupil may be at risk of harm. They are vigilant and follow the school’s procedures for reporting concerns. Leaders respond quickly when concerns are raised. They work effectively with external agencies to provide pupils and their families with the right support.

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 In some subjects, such as history, leaders planned or designed the curriculum well enough to enable pupils to acquire sufficiently deep knowledge. Pupils have gaps in their knowledge, including vocabulary. Leaders need to ensure that the school’s curricular model builds knowledge and skills sequentially and at the right 25–26 February 2020

p.3

4

time. Leaders need to ensure that teachers consistently deliver the planned curriculum, so that pupils achieve as well as they should in all subjects, especially in key stage 2.  At times, teachers do not plan sequences of lessons which match the ambition of the curriculum for the most able pupils. As a result, some of the most able pupils do not achieve as well as they should in some subjects, including mathematics and science. Leaders should ensure that their planned training and support for staff is implemented so that teachers understand how to best deliver the curriculum for the most able pupils.  Pupils’ attendance remains below the national average. Some pupils with poor attendance do not achieve as well they should. Leaders have been effective in starting to improve attendance and reduce the number of pupils who are persistently absent. Leaders should continue to improve the attendance of all

p.4

4

pupils, particularly those who are disadvantaged and those with SEND. They should build on recent strategies, including working with parents so that families understand the importance of good attendance.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use Ofsted Parent View information when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

If you are the school and you are not happy with the inspection or the report, you can complain to Ofsted .

p.4

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.4

Further information

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 25–26 February 2020

p.4

School details

Inspection number 10133494 Type of school Primary

p.5

School details

Appropriate authority The governing body

p.5

School details

Date of previous inspection 16–17 June 2016, under section 5 of the Education Act 2005

p.5

Information about this school

 A new headteacher and assistant headteacher have been appointed in the last 18 months.  Since the last inspection, there have been several staff changes.  This school is a smaller-than-average-sized primary school.  The proportion of pupils known to be eligible for support through the pupil premium funding is above the national average.  The proportion of pupils identified with SEND is above the national average.

p.5

Information about this inspection

We carried out this inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.5

Information about this inspection

 We met with the headteacher, assistant headteachers, special educational needs coordinator, curriculum leaders and other members of staff. We spoke to a representative from the Diocese of Leeds. We spoke to a representative from the local authority. We also spoke to governors, including the chair of the governing body. 25–26 February 2020

p.5

6

 We observed pupils’ behaviour in lessons and around the school, including at breakfast club, playtimes and lunchtimes. We gathered pupils’ views about the school through formal and informal discussions.  We scrutinised a range of documentation, including the school’s self-evaluation and improvement plans, minutes of governing body meetings and safeguarding documents.  We evaluated information relating to pupils’ behaviour and attendance. We gathered the views of parents at the start of the school day. We also took account of the views of eight parents who submitted free-text responses to Ofsted’s online questionnaire, Parent View. We considered the views of the 25 members of staff who shared their views through Ofsted’s online survey.  We carried out a range of activities to check the arrangements for safeguarding pupils. We looked at the school’s policies relating to safeguarding, met the designated safeguarding leader and considered records of the vetting checks the

p.6

6

school makes on its staff. Inspectors asked many pupils for their opinions about safety, behaviour and bullying in the school.  We met with staff involved in the provision for pupils with SEND and those who provide support with pupils’ personal development.  We undertook deep dives into mathematics, reading, history and science. This involved meeting with curriculum leaders, visits to lessons in these subjects and listening to pupils read. The deep dives also included scrutiny of pupils’ books, consideration of art work on display and other kinds of work produced by pupils who were part of the classes we visited. In addition, we had discussions with teachers and a group of pupils from the lessons visited.

p.6

Inspection team

Jean Watt, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector

p.6

Inspection team

Catherine Precious Ofsted Inspector 25–26 February 2020

p.6

7

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.7

7

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.7

7

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

7

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

7

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion