Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)
Kniveton CofE Primary School
Summary
Steve Varnam (lead), Graham Boyd
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
11 Mar 2020
- Inspectorssingle source
Graham Boyd, Steve Varnam
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Good
- Early years verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Good
- Overall effectiveness verified
Good
- Personal development verified
Good
- Quality of education verified
Good
- Postcode verified
DE6 1JJ
- Name on report verified
Kniveton CofE Primary School
- URN verified
112834
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2006.
- OverallGood
- Behaviour and attitudesGood
- Early yearsGood
- Leadership and managementGood
- Personal developmentGood
- Quality of educationGood
66% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Good (5,043 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- They told us that they feel safe in school and that the staff are kind and caring. p.2
- The previous ‘outstanding’ judgement reflected the school’s overall effectiveness in December 2006 under the relevant inspection framework at that time. p.1
- The long time between inspections is because the law changed in 2011; it made outstanding schools exempt from routine inspection. 10–11 March 2020 p.1
- Staff have high expectations of pupils’ behaviour. p.3
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- They should ensure that this knowledge builds on what pupils have already learned. p.4
- Teachers should check that the books children read match their phonic knowledge. p.4
- They have a growing understanding of what the school does well and what it needs to improve. p.3
- Leaders should ensure that all staff are well trained in phonics. p.4
- Leaders know precisely what pupils need to learn in mathematics each year. p.2
- Leaders put clear plans in place that show what extra help these pupils need to succeed. p.3
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Reading & phonics14
“Some staff do not always teach phonics effectively.” p.2Teaching & assessment10
“Where teachers are more confident, pupils gain knowledge well.” p.3
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 1,267
- about usual (typical 1098)
- Reading level
- Plain English
- Flesch 65, typical 55
- Average sentence
- 13 words
- Next steps
- 6
- typical 4
- Hedged sentences
- 14%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of Kniveton CofE Primary School Kniveton, Ashbourne, Derbyshire DE6 1JJ
p.1
Overall effectiveness Good
The quality of education Good Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Good Leadership and management Good Early years provision Good Previous inspection grade Outstanding
p.1
Overall effectiveness Good
The previous ‘outstanding’ judgement reflected the school’s overall effectiveness in December 2006 under the relevant inspection framework at that time.
p.1
Overall effectiveness Good
The new judgement of ‘good’ reflects the current inspection framework, as well as any changes at the school since the last inspection.
p.1
Overall effectiveness Good
The school has not been inspected for 14 years, which is longer than the five-year maximum interval between inspections. Changes in school effectiveness may have happened at any point in that period. The long time between inspections is because the law changed in 2011; it made outstanding schools exempt from routine inspection. 10–11 March 2020
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Kniveton is a school at the heart of the community. Pupils are proud to attend. They skip into lessons with smiles on their faces. They told us that they feel safe in school and that the staff are kind and caring.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Staff know every pupil very well. The relationships between adults and pupils are highly positive. Pupils love spending time with their friends. Breaktimes are a harmonious time. Older pupils lead playground games like ‘stuck in the mud’. Other pupils play football, draw or read books. Pupils behave well. They enjoy earning golden tickets and being invited to have cookies and hot chocolate with the headteacher. Pupils know what bullying is. They say that bullying is dealt with well. Pupils told us that, ‘Everyone is different, but we are all equal.’
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Leaders want pupils to have special memories of their time in school. Pupils enjoy trips to Carsington Water to look at symmetry in nature. They visit Chatsworth House and complete the sculpture trail. Pupils talk fondly about the days out in Llandudno to learn about coastal erosion.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Leaders and teachers want pupils to achieve well. However, in some subjects the curriculum is not planned as well as in others.
p.2
better?
Leaders know how important it is that pupils learn to read. They have planned an ambitious reading curriculum. They know what they want pupils to be able to do and by when. Teachers in key stages 1 and 2 make sure that pupils read books that match well with their reading abilities. Staff work hard to build pupils’ vocabulary. We heard older pupils discussing the meaning of words, such as ‘optimistic’ and ‘anxious’. Teachers read stories to pupils every day. Pupils listen attentively and gasp when teachers leave stories on a cliffhanger. Pupils, including those with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND), read fluently and accurately. Pupils use the knowledge they have gained in reading when they are writing. The quality of pupils’ written work is of a high standard throughout the school.
p.2
better?
Children in the Reception Year do not always get off to a good start in reading. Some staff do not always teach phonics effectively. They do not model the sounds that letters make clearly enough. Teachers give some children books that are too difficult for them to read.
p.2
better?
Leaders know precisely what pupils need to learn in mathematics each year. Lessons build on what pupils can already do. Children in the early years quickly gain mathematical knowledge. They create repeating patterns using colours and know the names of three-dimensional shapes. Older pupils calculate improper fractions. They work out the value of digits in decimal numbers. Pupils achieve well in this subject. 10–11 March 2020
p.2
3
The curriculums for design and technology and for computing are not well planned. The knowledge pupils gain does not build on what they already know. Leaders are refining what important knowledge they want pupils to learn. Some staff are not trained well enough to teach in these subjects. Where teachers are more confident, pupils gain knowledge well. For example, in the early years, children make houses for the three little pigs using simple joining techniques.
p.3
3
Pupils with SEND get very good support to catch up. Leaders put clear plans in place that show what extra help these pupils need to succeed. Teachers and teaching assistants adapt lessons effectively. They provide physical apparatus and visual resources and use questions to encourage pupils to understand lesson content. Pupils with SEND achieve well in most subjects.
p.3
3
Staff have high expectations of pupils’ behaviour. Pupils are friendly and respectful. They enjoy writing about the kindness of others and displaying this on the ‘sea of kindness’ board. They enjoy collecting ‘learning stars’ and ‘golden points’ for their hard work.
p.3
3
Leaders want pupils to learn about different countries and cultures. Pupils are proud of the links that they have with schools in Gambia and Sri Lanka. Pupils learn about fair trade and civil rights during black history month.
p.3
3
Governors are a committed team. They have a growing understanding of what the school does well and what it needs to improve. However, they do not always check the work of leaders thoroughly enough to ensure that the actions they take to improve the school are impactful.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.
p.3
Safeguarding
Leaders and staff know pupils and their families well. They act quickly when they have concerns that a pupil may be at risk of harm. Leaders make sure that they seek the right support for pupils and families. They draw on the expertise of external agencies when needed.
p.3
Safeguarding
Pupils are taught how to stay safe. They have a good understanding of online safety. Pupils have a trusted adult they can talk to if they have a worry. When pupils do not feel confident enough to talk, they can use the ‘worry box’ to write about their concerns. 10–11 March 2020
p.3
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
The school’s curriculum is not yet sufficiently coherently planned and taught in some subjects, including for design and technology and computing. However, it is clear from the actions that leaders have already taken to plan the curriculums in these subjects that they are in the process of bringing this about. For this reason, inspectors have applied the transition arrangements in this case. Senior leaders should make clear what the most important knowledge is that pupils will learn. They should ensure that this knowledge builds on what pupils have already learned. Subject leaders should check that teachers have the knowledge and understanding to implement the curriculums effectively, so that pupils achieve well in these subjects. Some staff do not have strong enough subject knowledge in phonics. They do not always model letters and the sounds that they make well enough. Some children in the early years read books that are too demanding. These children are not able
p.4
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
to decode words accurately or fluently enough. Leaders should ensure that all staff are well trained in phonics. Teachers should check that the books children read match their phonic knowledge. Governors are sometimes overly reliant on what senior leaders tell them. They do not always hold leaders to account effectively. Governors should check the actions that leaders take more thoroughly so they are better placed to hold them to account effectively.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use Ofsted Parent View information when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
If you are the school and you are not happy with the inspection or the report, you can complain to Ofsted .
p.4
Further information
You can search for published performance information about the school.
p.4
Further information
In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 10–11 March 2020
p.4
School details
Inspection number 10121305 Type of school Primary
p.5
School details
Appropriate authority The governing body
p.5
School details
Chair of governing body Doug McConnachie
p.5
School details
Website www.knivetonprimaryschool.co.uk/
p.5
School details
Date of previous inspection 13 December 2006
p.5
Information about this school
The school has a before- and after-school club that the governing body manages. The school is designated as having a religious character and received a section 48 inspection in June 2017.
p.5
Information about this inspection
We carried out this inspection under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. We deemed the inspection a section 5 inspection under the same Act. The previous ‘outstanding’ judgement reflected the school’s overall effectiveness in December 2006 under the relevant inspection framework at that time. The new judgement of ‘good’ reflects the current inspection framework, as well as any changes at the school since the last inspection. We met with the headteacher, senior teacher, the special educational needs coordinator, the early years leader, six members of the governing body and a representative of the local authority. We did deep dives in these subjects: reading, mathematics, computing and design and technology. We visited lessons, scrutinised pupils’ work, listened to pupils reading and spoke with pupils about their lessons. We also examined the 10–11 March 2020
p.5
6
quality of pupils’ work in geography, writing, history, religious education (RE) and modern foreign languages. We looked at a wide range of documents, including those relating to safeguarding and behaviour, as well as the school’s plans for improvement and curriculum planning. We considered information about pupils’ achievement from published information and looked at information on the school’s website. We considered the 36 responses to Ofsted Parent View, Ofsted’s online questionnaire. We spoke with parents informally at the end of the school day.
p.6
6
Steve Varnam, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector
p.6
6
Graham Boyd Ofsted Inspector 10–11 March 2020
p.6
7
regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.7
7
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.7
7
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.7
7
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.7
7
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion