Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)
Blue Coat Church of England School and Music College
Summary
Eddie Wilkes (lead), Adele Mills, Antony Edkins
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
4 Mar 2020
- Inspectors verified
Adele Mills, Antony Edkins, Eddie Wilkes
- Postcode verified
CV1 2BA
- Name on report verified
Blue Coat Church of England School and Music College
- URN verified
137272
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- However, inspectors have some concerns that one or more areas may be declining, as set out below. p.1
- If we have serious concerns about safeguarding, behaviour or the quality of education, we will convert the section 8 inspection to a section 5 inspection immediately. p.3
- For some pupils, repeated instances of poor behaviour result in removal from lessons and spending time in ‘internal isolation’. p.2
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Leaders should make sure that teachers plan lessons that take account of the needs of all pupils, including those with SEND. p.3
- They are well informed about leaders’ plans for improvement and are aware of the need to ensure that they hold leaders to account for moving these forward. p.2
- If pupils are removed from lessons leaders should ensure that this does not result in them falling behind. p.3
- Leaders should make sure that the information they hold on positive and negative behaviour in lessons is used to work with pupils and teachers to ensure that learning is not disrupted. p.3
- Leaders should ensure that subject leaders are planning a carefully sequenced, ambitious curriculum in their subject areas, and check that pupils acquire and retain sufficient depth of knowledge across the breadth of the curriculum. p.3
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 1,284
- about usual (typical 1153)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 58, typical 55
- Average sentence
- 17 words
- Next steps
- 5
- typical 4
- Hedged sentences
- 20%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of a good school: Blue Coat Church of England School and Music College Terry Road, Coventry, West Midlands CV1 2BA
p.1
Outcome
Blue Coat Church of England School and Music College continues to be a good school. However, inspectors have some concerns that one or more areas may be declining, as set out below.
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
The school has a strong caring ethos based around its values. These include care, hard work, respect, integrity and servanthood. Pupils feel safe in school and attend well. They say that on the odd occasions when bullying does occur the school deals with it well.
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Most teachers have high expectations of their pupils and work hard to help them to do their best. This leads to high levels of achievement in many subjects at key stages 4 and 5. However, the emphasis on examination success in some subjects means that pupils do not get the opportunity to learn enough across a wide range of subjects, particularly at key stage 3.
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Teachers know their subjects well. However, they do not always take the needs of all pupils into account when planning lessons, particularly those with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND).
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Most pupils behave well and are keen to do their best. But, in some lessons they lack interest and occasionally disrupt learning. Usually this is where learning is not planned well enough and teachers are not ensuring that pupils understand what they are learning.
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
The school offers a wide range of drama, music and sporting extra-curricular activities which many pupils enjoy.
p.1
What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?
Leaders want the best for their pupils. They have built a strong ethos of care for everyone who attends the school. Pupils’ pastoral needs are carefully monitored and there are effective systems in place to support the most vulnerable pupils. Leaders have recently 3–4 March 2020
p.1
2
enhanced their model of care through the introduction of a ‘vertical tutoring system’, encouraging older pupils to guide and support younger pupils in a ‘family model’.
p.2
2
Leaders have designed a seven-year curriculum model aimed at achieving continuity from Year 7 to Year 13. However, leaders have not ensured that the key stage 3 curriculum is broad and ambitious for all pupils. This means that some subjects, for example history, languages and technology, are not studied in enough detail.
p.2
2
The sixth-form curriculum is well planned. Teachers ensure that students learn with increasing levels of independence. As a result, sixth-form students achieve well. Students access extensive advice to help them make decisions about further education and careers. They play a significant part in wider school life. For example, they take the lead role in the school council and act as well-being mentors for younger pupils.
p.2
2
Most pupils behave well. However, sometimes pupils do not fully engage with their work, which on occasion results in low-level disruption. This is particularly the case where activities are not well matched to pupils’ needs, so pupils are not able to understand what they are learning.
p.2
2
For some pupils, repeated instances of poor behaviour result in removal from lessons and spending time in ‘internal isolation’. While leaders monitor which pupils are involved in this, and provide some work for them, some pupils fall further behind in their learning.
p.2
2
Systems are in place to identify the learning needs of pupils with SEND. However, some teachers are not using this information well enough to adapt their lessons. This means that these pupils do not do as well as they could. Leaders are aware of these issues, but it is too early to see the impact of their work to improve the situation.
p.2
2
Parents appreciate the extensive additional opportunities which the school offers their children. These include drama club, instrumental lessons, orchestra, choir, sports clubs and a wide range of trips. The hard work of staff and pupils results in regular high-quality productions, such as the termly concerts and the forthcoming performance of ‘Bugsy Malone’.
p.2
2
Governors know their school well and want the best for all pupils. They are well informed about leaders’ plans for improvement and are aware of the need to ensure that they hold leaders to account for moving these forward.
p.2
2
Staff say they feel valued. They appreciate the way that leaders have worked with them to plan their professional development and ensure that their workload is manageable.
p.2
2
In discussion with the headteacher, we agreed that the curriculum (particularly at key stage 3), provision for SEND pupils, and behaviour may usefully serve as a focus for the next inspection.
p.2
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective. 3–4 March 2020
p.2
3
Leaders ensure that safeguarding procedures are given high priority. Staff receive regular training and updates to ensure that they understand their safeguarding responsibilities. Any concerns are followed up without delay. Record-keeping is thorough. Leaders work alongside a range of other agencies to provide the right support for pupils. Pupils feel safe in the school and know they can talk to an adult at school if they have any concerns .
p.3
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
Leaders have not ensured that the curriculum is broad and ambitious enough to meet the needs of all pupils, particularly at key stage 3. This means that pupils are not gaining a broad range of knowledge in enough depth by the time they complete key stage 3. Leaders should ensure that subject leaders are planning a carefully sequenced, ambitious curriculum in their subject areas, and check that pupils acquire and retain sufficient depth of knowledge across the breadth of the curriculum. Leaders have not ensured that teachers are making best use of the information they are given about pupils with SEND. Consequently, teachers do not plan work that is well matched to the abilities of these pupils. Leaders should make sure that teachers plan lessons that take account of the needs of all pupils, including those with SEND. In some lessons, the low-level disruption caused by a small number of pupils interrupts
p.3
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
learning. Leaders should make sure that the information they hold on positive and negative behaviour in lessons is used to work with pupils and teachers to ensure that learning is not disrupted. If pupils are removed from lessons leaders should ensure that this does not result in them falling behind.
p.3
Background
When we have judged a school to be good we will then normally go into the school about once every four years to confirm that the school remains good. This is called a section 8 inspection of a good or non-exempt outstanding school. We do not give graded judgements on a section 8 inspection. However, if we find some evidence that the school standards may be declining then the next inspection will be a section 5 inspection. Usually this is within one to two years of the date of the section 8 inspection. If we have serious concerns about safeguarding, behaviour or the quality of education, we will convert the section 8 inspection to a section 5 inspection immediately.
p.3
Background
This is the first section 8 inspection since we judged the school to be good on 9–10 June 2016.
p.3
How can I feed back my views?
find out what other parents and carers think. We use Ofsted Parent View information when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection. 3–4 March 2020
p.3
4
The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.
p.4
4
If you are the school and you are not happy with the inspection or the report, you can complain to Ofsted .
p.4
Further information
You can search for published performance information about the school.
p.4
Further information
In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 3–4 March 2020
p.4
School details
Inspection number 10122550 Type of school Secondary
p.5
provision
Number of pupils on the school roll 1,634
p.5
form
Date of previous inspection 9–10 June 2016
p.5
Information about this school
The school makes use of alternative provision organised in conjunction with Coventry local authority to provide work-based learning. Providers are Brakes Training Ltd, Educ8 and Right Trax.
p.5
Information about this inspection
During the inspection, we focused on the following subjects: mathematics, languages, history, technology and drama. We visited lessons, looked at pupils’ work, looked at teachers’ plans and talked with pupils and staff about the way these subjects are planned and taught. We took into account external performance data about the school and looked at school documents and the website. 3–4 March 2020
p.5
6
We spoke to staff, leaders and governors about safeguarding. We looked at records of employment checks on school staff and checked the school site. We observed pupils’ behaviour in classrooms and around the school at the start and finish of the day, between lessons and during breaktimes. During the inspection, we had formal meetings with the principal, senior leaders, subject leaders, teachers and governors. We also talked informally with pupils and staff to gather general information about school life. We looked at the responses to Ofsted’s online questionnaires for parents, staff and pupils.
p.6
Inspection team
Eddie Wilkes, lead inspector Ofsted Inspector
p.6
Inspection team
Antony Edkins Ofsted Inspector 3–4 March 2020
p.6
7
regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.7
7
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.7
7
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.7
7
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.7
7
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion