Summary
Elizabeth Farr (lead), Stephen Lee, Stephen McShane, Teresa Hill
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
16 Jan 2020
- Inspectors verified
Elizabeth Farr, Stephen Lee, Stephen McShane, Teresa Hill
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Inadequate
- Overall effectiveness verified
Inadequate
- Personal development verified
Good
- Quality of education verified
Requires improvement
- Postcode verified
EX7 9SF
- Name on report verified
Orchard Manor School
- URN verified
113656
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2011.
- OverallInadequate
- Behaviour and attitudesGood
- Leadership and managementInadequate
- Personal developmentGood
- Quality of educationRequires improvement
3% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Inadequate (5,043 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Staff know their pupils well and have high expectations of what pupils are capable of. p.2
- However, pupils are confident that staff manage such situations effectively. p.2
- They are determined that pupils are well prepared for their adult lives, gaining the qualifications they need to be successful when they leave. p.2
- Leaders should ensure that staff continue to receive support and guidance to implement leaders’ curricular expectations confidently and skilfully. p.4
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- However, record-keeping systems need to strengthen so that all concerns are carefully recorded first-hand. p.4
- Leaders need to ensure that the school’s attendance processes comply with the Department for Education’s requirements. p.4
- Leaders need to ensure that they gain the full confidence of everyone, so to unify the school community towards common goals. p.4
- Leaders need to make sure that all pupils are accounted for and are kept safe. p.4
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 8
- Words of findings
- 1,121
- shorter than usual (typical 1552)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 48, typical 53
- Average sentence
- 13 words
- Next steps
- 4
- typical 6
- Hedged sentences
- 14%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of Orchard Manor School John Nash Drive, Dawlish EX7 9SF
p.1
Overall effectiveness Inadequate
The quality of education Requires improvement Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Good Leadership and management Inadequate Sixth-form provision Good Previous inspection grade Good 15–30 January 2020
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils are not kept safe. Registration processes are not followed closely enough. Therefore, at times adults do not know if pupils have arrived at school or whether they are absent. This is a significant safeguarding risk.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils forge positive friendships during their time here. They particularly enjoy playing football together during social times. Pupils are not unduly concerned by bullying.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils readily identify many aspects of schooling that they enjoy. At the top of pupils’ lists of positives is the way that staff make their education an enjoyable experience. Staff know their pupils well and have high expectations of what pupils are capable of. In return, pupils try their best and are determined to succeed. They respond well to the ready encouragement that is on hand.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils say that they like learning in this school, including in mathematics, science and cookery. However, the learning in some subjects is not well planned to promote secure learning. Nevertheless, most pupils feel that learning is fun. They say that sometimes they are distracted by others’ behaviour. However, pupils are confident that staff manage such situations effectively.
p.2
better?
Leaders do not maintain accurate attendance information. Pupils’ registration status is not always recorded consistently or correctly. Incorrect changes are made to pupils’ registration marks without adequate justification. The statutory guidelines for maintaining pupils’ attendance records are not followed. All this means that pupils’ attendance rates look better than they are.
p.2
better?
Since the school amalgamated in September 2018, staff have had to adjust to considerable change. Leaders have overhauled many systems and processes and introduced new ways of working. Leaders’ school improvement planning is detailed and sets out appropriate school improvement priorities. Some aspects are improving securely, such as a reduction in the incidents of bullying. However, everyone’s efforts are not yet cohesive. Leaders have not yet gained the full confidence or trust of staff. Many staff say that they do not feel valued or treated with respect. Staff do not feel empowered nor a proactive part of the school’s improvement journey.
p.2
better?
Leaders have strengthened the school’s curricular offer. They are determined that pupils are well prepared for their adult lives, gaining the qualifications they need to be successful when they leave. Leaders make sensible decisions about the subjects on offer and how they will be implemented. New subject leaders are beginning to take greater ownership of the school’s curriculum. With support, these leaders have produced helpful subject overviews. These demonstrate a clear and logical sequence to pupils’ learning. This approach is making a positive difference, although the changes are not yet sufficiently embedded to ensure a consistently good quality of education. 15–30 January 2020
p.2
3
Leaders have implemented a consistent approach to teaching in some subject areas. Staff demonstrate secure and shared subject knowledge that is supported well by useful training. Useful and proportionate assessment processes have started. However, there is some inconsistency in how teachers make use of this information to guide pupils’ future learning. In some instances, there is a mismatch between learning goals and pupils’ capabilities.
p.3
3
Opportunities for pupils to read and learn about books are securely evident throughout the school. Most pupils are reading books that match their capabilities and interest level. Leaders are rightly prioritising the teaching of reading and making appropriate adaptations as new ways of working take hold.
p.3
3
Pupils’ life skills and their resilience are developed well. For instance, sixth-form students confidently set up lunchtime without the need for adult intervention. Staff strongly promote pupils’ independence through the adoption of well-established routines. Pupils are confident because staff create an ethos of belonging.
p.3
3
Sixth-form students are benefiting from the move to a new purpose-built facility. This provides an attractive place to learn. Pupils are treated as young adults and benefit from the school’s very personalised approach. Key areas such as literacy, numeracy, employability and the development of life skills are prioritised in equal measure. This means that pupils are well prepared for the next stage.
p.3
3
Governors have played an instrumental role in supporting the amalgamation process. Governors are aware that there remains tension between leaders’ priorities and levels of staff engagement and confidence.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are not effective.
p.3
Safeguarding
Leaders do not know, or record accurately, which pupils have arrived on site and which pupils have not. Accounting for pupils’ whereabouts is not taken seriously enough. This puts pupils at risk.
p.3
Safeguarding
When concerns arise about adults or pupils, leaders ensure that they seek relevant advice or intervention from a range of services. The appropriate course of action is followed. However, in some instances, first-hand accounts are not recorded. Although concerns are dealt with satisfactorily, there is a lack of emphasis on the importance of first-hand reporting.
p.3
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
The school’s registration processes are not followed carefully enough, and this leaves staff unclear of pupils’ whereabouts. Frequently, pupils’ attendance is 15–30 January 2020
p.3
4
either not recorded at all or inaccurately recorded. This poses a safeguarding risk. Leaders need to make sure that all pupils are accounted for and are kept safe. Staff have received appropriate safeguarding training. When concerns arise, leaders take appropriate action. However, record-keeping systems need to strengthen so that all concerns are carefully recorded first-hand. The school’s attendance information is inaccurate. Recording pupils’ attendance information correctly is a statutory obligation. Leaders need to ensure that the school’s attendance processes comply with the Department for Education’s requirements. The school’s curriculum is well sequenced. However, it is very new and, consequently, staff are still getting to grips with leaders’ expectations. Leaders should ensure that staff continue to receive support and guidance to implement leaders’ curricular expectations confidently and skilfully.
p.4
4
The school has undergone significant change. Leaders have brought about improvement, and expectations have risen considerably. Nevertheless, some staff and parents and carers remain unsettled by the rapid rate of change. Some staffing arrangements are still not fully established. Leaders need to ensure that they gain the full confidence of everyone, so to unify the school community towards common goals.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use Ofsted Parent View information when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
If you are the school and you are not happy with the inspection or the report, you can complain to Ofsted .
p.4
Further information
You can search for published performance information about the school.
p.4
Further information
In the report, 'disadvantaged pupils' refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 15–30 January 2020
p.4
School details
Inspection number 10122318 Type of school Special
p.5
sixth form
Appropriate authority The governing body
p.5
sixth form
Date of previous inspection 25–26 March 2015
p.5
Information about this school
In September 2018, Ratcliffe School amalgamated with Oaklands Park School. The school retained the same registration status as Ratcliffe School, and Oaklands Park School closed. The newly amalgamated school was renamed Orchard Manor School. The school has extended its age range and now includes a sixth form. The senior leadership team comprises an executive principal and two deputy principals (one who acts as head of education and the other as head of care). There are also five assistant principals who share a range of responsibilities. The executive principal joined the school in April 2017. The vast majority of other senior leaders joined in September 2018. Since September 2018, some teaching staff have left. The school is currently recruiting additional non-teaching staff. Ratcliffe School was previously inspected in March 2015. 15–30 January 2020
p.5
6
Orchard Manor School is part of the SENtient Trust, a cooperative foundation trust formed in 2012, with eight other special schools in Devon. All pupils attending Orchard Manor School have an education, health and care plan. The school caters primarily for pupils who have communication and interaction difficulties, autistic spectrum conditions and associated learning needs. Some pupils have other needs, including severe learning difficulties and social, emotional and mental health needs. Some pupils attend alternative provision at Bicton College and Combe Pafford School.
p.6
Information about this inspection
We carried out this inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.6
Information about this inspection
In accordance with section 44(2) of the Education Act 2005, Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector is of the opinion that this school requires significant improvement, because it is performing significantly less well than it might in all the circumstances reasonably be expected to perform.
p.6
Information about this inspection
Very occasionally, Ofsted will delay the publication of a report to ensure full consideration of concerns identified after the inspection visit. In rare instances, this process may cause Ofsted to conclude that the inspection is incomplete. This happened at Orchard Manor School. Her Majesty’s Inspectors returned to the school on 29 January 2020 to gather additional information to secure the evidence base. In such cases, the inspection report is not published until Ofsted is satisfied that the inspection is secure. We held meetings with senior leaders, middle leaders and some staff. We did deep dives in reading, mathematics, physical education (PE) and personal, social, health and economic (PSHE) education to evaluate the quality of education. We discussed the curriculum design with leaders, carried out lesson visits, scrutinised pupils’ work and spoke to pupils and teachers, from the lessons visited, about the curriculum.
p.6
Information about this inspection
Procedures and practice for keeping pupils safe were thoroughly evaluated. The school’s single central record was reviewed. We met with the designated safeguarding lead, scrutinised documentation, including a sample of case files, and spoke to pupils and staff. Meetings were held with two governors, including the chair of the governing body. The lead inspector spoke on the telephone to the school’s improvement partner and a representative from the local authority. A conversation was held with the head of learning and education from Devon County Council. We met with pupils to discuss their views about the school and talked to pupils informally about the school. No pupils responded to Ofsted’s online pupil survey. During the inspection, survey responses from 99 members of staff and 32 parents, including 24 free-text comments, were considered. We also spoke with some staff to gather their views.
p.6
Inspection team
Elizabeth Farr, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector
p.7
Inspection team
Stephen Lee Senior Her Majesty’s Inspector 15–30 January 2020
p.7
8
regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.8
8
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.8
8
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.8
8
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.8
8
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.8
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion