Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)
Tealby School
Summary
Helen Williams (lead), Caroline Evans
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
12 Mar 2020
- Inspectors verified
Caroline Evans, Helen Williams
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Good
- Early years verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Good
- Overall effectiveness verified
Good
- Personal development verified
Good
- Quality of education verified
Good
- Postcode verified
LN8 3XU
- Name on report verified
Tealby School
- URN verified
120480
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.
- OverallGood
- Behaviour and attitudesGood
- Early yearsGood
- Leadership and managementGood
- Personal developmentGood
- Quality of educationGood
66% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Good (5,043 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The previous ‘outstanding’ judgement reflected the school’s overall effectiveness in March 2014 under the relevant inspection framework at that time. p.1
- The long time between inspections is because the law changed in 2011; it made outstanding schools exempt from routine inspection. 11–12 March 2020 p.1
- They have high expectations for what pupils should be able to do across the curriculum. p.2
- Staff say they have been very well supported through these changes. p.2
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Some pupils are not challenged enough, and others are not always provided with the resources they might need to help them. p.4
- Governors must review their current practice to ensure they have an overview of the school’s strengths and weaknesses, enabling them to fully hold leaders to account. p.4
- Leaders must make sure that teachers know how to adapt the curriculum to meet the needs of all learners. p.4
- This has prevented the governing body from finding out why pupils have not achieved as well as they should. p.3
- Occasionally in mathematics, the ambition for what a few pupils should be able to achieve is not matched closely to the tasks they are given. p.4
- Leaders must ensure that the curriculum for reading develops pupils’ reading knowledge so that they can confidently discuss and analyse different texts. p.4
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Leadership & governance11
“Leaders check records of concerns frequently.” p.3Teaching & assessment10
“The headteacher has implemented a new system for reporting safeguarding concerns.” p.3Progress & outcomes4
“Pupils achieve early success, which helps to develop their love of books.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 1,202
- about usual (typical 1098)
- Reading level
- Plain English
- Flesch 62, typical 55
- Average sentence
- 14 words
- Next steps
- 6
- typical 4
- Hedged sentences
- 12%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of Tealby School Front Street, Market Rasen, Lincolnshire LN8 3XU
p.1
Overall effectiveness Good
The quality of education Good Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Good Leadership and management Good Early years provision Good Previous inspection grade Outstanding
p.1
Overall effectiveness Good
The previous ‘outstanding’ judgement reflected the school’s overall effectiveness in March 2014 under the relevant inspection framework at that time.
p.1
Overall effectiveness Good
The new judgement of ‘good’ reflects the current inspection framework as well as any changes at the school since the last inspection.
p.1
Overall effectiveness Good
The school has not been inspected for six years, which is longer than the five-year maximum interval between inspections. Changes in school effectiveness may have happened at any point in that period. The long time between inspections is because the law changed in 2011; it made outstanding schools exempt from routine inspection. 11–12 March 2020
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils receive a good standard of education at Tealby school. They have lots of opportunities to learn about all subjects of the national curriculum. Teachers link learning to help it stick in pupils’ memory. They have high expectations for what pupils should be able to do across the curriculum.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils have high standards for themselves and each other. They hope to achieve the weekly values award or, even better, the headteacher’s award. When they have a problem, they first try to work it out with their friends. They know staff are on hand if they need them. Pupils are not worried about bullying. They say that it is extremely rare. Of the pupils inspectors spoke with, none could think of a single incident of bullying.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils relish the opportunities they have to learn outside the classroom. The outdoor learning programme makes good use of the facilities around the school. Pupils test out their independence and resilience by learning survival skills.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
The school’s curriculum is well planned to develop pupils’ knowledge as they go through the school. Leaders have redesigned the curriculum for reading and mathematics this year. However, some aspects need sharpening to make the curriculum in these subjects even better.
p.2
better?
In a very short space of time, leaders have made significant improvements. These improvements are having a positive impact on pupils’ learning. Staff say they have been very well supported through these changes.
p.2
better?
The school’s programme for phonics is effective. As pupils learn more sounds, they read with increasing confidence. Teachers make sure that the books that pupils read closely match their stage of reading. Pupils achieve early success, which helps to develop their love of books. When pupils finish the phonics programme, the reading curriculum is less well structured. Most pupils learn the reading knowledge they need, but they lack confidence when discussing what they have read.
p.2
better?
In mathematics, the curriculum is well designed and sequenced. It builds on what pupils already know. Teachers revisit previous learning to make sure that pupils remember it. Teachers are working well with this new approach. This is helping pupils to develop secure mathematical knowledge. Occasionally, teachers do not precisely adapt the curriculum to meet the needs of a few pupils. Some are not challenged enough. Others need extra support to help them understand what they are learning.
p.2
better?
Teachers join learning in different subjects together. They plan activities from a well- sequenced curriculum. Teachers know what pupils have learned before, and what 11–12 March 2020
p.2
3
they need to know in the future. This enables them to plan activities which help to build pupils’ knowledge. For example, pupils made Second World War gas mask boxes using their knowledge of 3D shapes and nets.
p.3
3
In the early years, children are very enthusiastic learners. The early years team has good knowledge of the curriculum. This allows the staff to encourage children to take their learning where they want it to go. For example, children learned about the fable of the crow and the pitcher. Children began by trying out how adding stones to a cup of water raises the water level. Some children took this further, and considered the welfare of the crow and other birds. They drew on their previous learning about animals and their habitats.
p.3
3
Leaders have made sure that pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) have the right support. Leaders are aware that some pupils have been inaccurately identified as having SEND. Some of these pupils may have gaps in knowledge due to weaknesses in the curriculum in the past. Leaders are carefully checking the support these pupils receive to help them to catch up.
p.3
3
In lessons, pupils behave very well. When learning in the wider curriculum, they are highly motivated, determined and resilient. Occasionally, when they are less confident, they do not show these learning traits. Pupils understand that people are different, yet the same. They are respectful of people’s choices.
p.3
3
In the past, the school’s governing body has been too accepting of what leaders have told it. This has prevented the governing body from finding out why pupils have not achieved as well as they should. The governing body’s procedures are not strong enough to sharply hold leaders to account.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.
p.3
Safeguarding
The headteacher has implemented a new system for reporting safeguarding concerns. This is well understood by staff. The new system pulls together safeguarding, behaviour and pastoral concerns. Leaders check records of concerns frequently. They can spot any patterns of concerns. Staff at all levels know why it is important to pass on concerns. They are vigilant and know the possible signs of abuse. One member of staff told inspectors it was important to get to know pupils, so that they can spot any changes in behaviour.
p.3
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
Once pupils complete the phonics programme, the development of their reading knowledge is not precisely planned. The knowledge that pupils will need when reading is not made explicit enough. Some pupils do not know how to analyse 11–12 March 2020
p.3
4
more complex texts. Leaders must ensure that the curriculum for reading develops pupils’ reading knowledge so that they can confidently discuss and analyse different texts. Occasionally in mathematics, the ambition for what a few pupils should be able to achieve is not matched closely to the tasks they are given. Some pupils are not challenged enough, and others are not always provided with the resources they might need to help them. Leaders must make sure that teachers know how to adapt the curriculum to meet the needs of all learners. The school’s governing body does not have robust systems and procedures in place to fully understand and challenge what is happening at the school. Governors must review their current practice to ensure they have an overview of the school’s strengths and weaknesses, enabling them to fully hold leaders to account.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use Ofsted Parent View information when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
If you are the school and you are not happy with the inspection or the report, you can complain to Ofsted .
p.4
Further information
You can search for published performance information about the school.
p.4
Further information
In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 11–12 March 2020
p.4
School details
Inspection number 10121309 Type of school Primary
p.5
School details
Appropriate authority The governing body
p.5
School details
Date of previous inspection 27–28 March 2014
p.5
Information about this school
The headteacher joined the school in September 2019.
p.5
Information about this inspection
We carried out this inspection under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. We deemed the inspection a section 5 inspection under the same Act.
p.5
Information about this inspection
The new judgement of ‘good’ reflects the current inspection framework as well as any changes at the school since the last inspection.
p.5
Information about this inspection
The school has not been inspected for six years, which is longer than the five-year maximum interval between inspections under section 5 of the Education Act 2005. Changes in school effectiveness may have happened at any point in that period. The long time between inspections is because the law changed in 2011; it made most outstanding schools exempt from routine inspection.
p.5
Information about this inspection
We did deep dives in the following subjects: reading, mathematics, music and science. This included lesson visits and discussions with teachers and subject 11–12 March 2020
p.5
6
leaders. We talked with pupils about their learning and looked at examples of pupils’ workbooks in these and other subjects. We held meetings with the headteacher, subject leaders and teachers. We spoke with teaching assistants, as well as administration and lunchtime staff. We spoke with a member of the governing body. We held telephone discussions with the chair of the governing body and with the local authority representative. We considered the 42 responses to the Ofsted Parent View and spoke with parents. We looked at a range of documents, including the school’s own evaluation of the curriculum, curriculum plans, plans for improvement and the most recent published information on the achievement and progress of pupils. We examined information relating to the arrangements for safeguarding pupils.
p.6
Inspection team
Helen Williams, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector
p.6
Inspection team
Caroline Evans Ofsted Inspector 11–12 March 2020
p.6
7
regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.7
7
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.7
7
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.7
7
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.7
7
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion