Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

Samuel Laycock School

Inspected 11 Mar 2020 · published 24 Jun 2020 · URN 106280

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Requires improvement

Martin Hanbury (lead), Claire Hollister, Iain Sim

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    11 Mar 2020

  • Inspectors verified

    Claire Hollister, Iain Sim, Martin Hanbury

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Requires improvement

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Requires improvement

  • Personal development verified

    Good

  • Quality of education verified

    Requires improvement

  • Postcode verified

    OL6 8RF

  • Name on report verified

    Samuel Laycock School

  • URN verified

    106280

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2017.

  • OverallRequires improvement
  • Behaviour and attitudesGood
  • Leadership and managementRequires improvement
  • Personal developmentGood
  • Quality of educationRequires improvement

15% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Requires improvement (5,043 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+36Positivemore positive than 72% of reports of this type graded Requires improvement
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseeffectiveconsistentlywell plannedstrongsafefeel safeenjoyrespectful
Criticismunsafeweaknessesfalling behindnot alwaysconcernsnot happy

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings963w+41
  • Safeguarding88w+11
  • What needs to improve26w—

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
1,042
about usual (typical 1215)
Reading level
Plain English
Flesch 65, typical 56
Average sentence
14 words
Next steps
6
typical 5
Hedged sentences
13%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 61%Safeguarding 6%What needs to improve 2%About the inspection 32%

Full report text

Inspection of Samuel Laycock School Broadoak Road, Ashton Under Lyne OL6 8RF

p.1

Overall effectiveness Requires improvement

The quality of education Requires improvement Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Good Leadership and management Requires improvement Previous inspection grade Requires improvement 10–11 March 2020

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils like coming to Samuel Laycock School. They help each other, feel safe and enjoy most of their activities.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils work hard in lessons and try their best to do the tasks that teachers give to them.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils behave well. They are respectful and polite. A few pupils find it difficult to manage their behaviour. Staff give them extra help to behave as well as they should. The pupils that we spoke to said that bullying is rare and that staff deal with it well.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Many pupils take part in breakfast clubs and after-school clubs. Staff help the pupils to be healthy and happy through these and other activities.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Over the last few years, teachers have not had high enough expectations of pupils. Pupils have not achieved as much as possible during their time at school. This is changing. Last year, Year 11 pupils did well in their entry-level and functional skills qualifications in English and mathematics. That said, improvements to the curriculum are still very new. Pupils do not gain the knowledge and skills they should in a range of subjects.

p.2

better?

Governors and leaders have a good understanding of the school’s strengths and weaknesses. Some of the improvement plans that they have put in place are beginning to work. The quality of education that pupils receive is improving. However, there is more to do to ensure that pupils achieve well across a range of subjects.

p.2

better?

Senior leaders have made some important improvements to the curriculum. The curriculum for English and mathematics is well planned and teachers are developing the skills to teach it. For example, the mathematics curriculum has been redesigned, and in English, teachers have developed effective approaches to help pupils write more fluently. This is beginning to improve the quality of education in these subjects. In English and mathematics, teachers give pupils work that helps them to build on things that they know so that they can learn more.

p.2

better?

In other subjects, improvements to the curriculum are at an earlier stage. Teachers do not have the skills to teach these subjects consistently well. This means that pupils are not learning as much as they should.

p.2

better?

Leaders have developed systems to let them check how well pupils are learning the curriculum. This lets them help pupils who are falling behind and adjust the curriculum to help meet pupils’ individual learning needs, as outlined in their education, health and care (EHC) plans. Teachers do not always use information from these checks on pupils’ learning as well as possible. Sometimes, pupils are not 10–11 March 2020

p.2

3

able to do their work because it is too difficult. At other times, the work is too easy. This slows some pupils’ learning.

p.3

3

Pupils behave well in their lessons, during breaktimes and when they are arriving at or leaving the school. Staff work hard to develop good relationships with pupils. School leaders have systems in place to monitor pupils’ behaviour. This means that they are able to support pupils to manage their own behaviour. This helps pupils to learn better. Governors and senior leaders have acted on the concerns of some staff about the challenging behaviour of a few pupils.

p.3

3

Pupils’ attendance is improving. Leaders and staff work hard to help pupils improve their attendance. Parents and carers value the way the school helps their children.

p.3

3

Pupils are kind to one another. They have fun together and celebrate the differences between people. Pupils are confident in talking with adults and are proud of their achievements. Staff prepare pupils well for adult life and help them make the move to the next stage of their education.

p.3

3

Leaders listen to members of staff and involve them in decisions. Leaders are open to new ideas and look for different ways to improve the school.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.3

Safeguarding

There is a strong culture of safeguarding in the school. This is evident among governors, leaders, staff and pupils. Pupils know whom to tell if they are worried. They explained how they have been taught to stay safe when working online. Members of staff know how to keep pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) safe. They understand the local issues that might make pupils in the school unsafe.

p.3

Safeguarding

The school works with other professionals and families to keep pupils safe.

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 Recent improvements to mathematics and English are making a difference to pupils’ learning. However, in other subjects, leaders have only recently introduced a coherently planned and well-organised curriculum. This means that pupils do not achieve as well as they should in a range of subjects. Leaders should ensure that they implement the new curriculum plans fully. They should also check on how well the new plans are working to make sure that pupils can learn more and remember more.  Some teachers do not have the skills or expertise to teach all aspects of the curriculum consistently well. This stops some pupils from learning as well as they should. Leaders must ensure that they provide appropriate training to the 10–11 March 2020

p.3

4

teaching staff to ensure that they are well prepared to teach the planned curriculum.  Teachers do not use information about pupils’ learning well enough to help pupils build on what they already know and can do. This means that the tasks they receive are often too easy or too difficult. Leaders should ensure that teachers use the information available to better plan learning so that pupils can make the progress that they should through the planned curriculum.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use Ofsted Parent View information when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

If you are the school and you are not happy with the inspection or the report, you can complain to Ofsted .

p.4

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.4

Further information

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 10–11 March 2020

p.4

School details

Inspection number 10121970 Type of school Special

p.5

School details

Appropriate authority The governing body

p.5

School details

Date of previous inspection 19–20 September 2017, under section 8 of the Education Act 2005

p.5

Information about this school

 The school caters for secondary-aged pupils with moderate learning difficulties and for pupils with autism spectrum disorder. All pupils have an EHC plan.  The head of school was appointed in September 2018.  In September 2019, pupil numbers rose from 144 to 170. This is a significant increase. As a result, governors and leaders have recruited a large group of new staff who have recently joined the school.

p.5

Information about this inspection

We carried out this inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.5

Information about this inspection

 During this inspection, we visited lessons, and spoke with pupils about their work and asked them what it is like to attend the school. We had discussions with governors, leaders, teachers, teaching assistants and members of support staff. We spoke with a representative of the local authority and members of staff at pupils’ work experience placements. 10–11 March 2020

p.5

6

 We reviewed documentation, including leaders’ evaluation of the school and their plans for improving the school. We looked at subject leaders’ recently developed curriculum plans and records of staff’s professional development.  We examined a range of documents about safeguarding, including the school’s record of checks undertaken on members of staff and records of the process for recruiting staff.  We read survey responses from pupils, parents and members of staff. We considered 18 responses to Ofsted’s survey, Parent View, and read nine comments received through the free-text facility. We considered 40 responses to Ofsted’s staff questionnaire and 34 responses to Ofsted’s pupil questionnaire.  We did deep dives in these subjects: English, mathematics, humanities and personal, social, health and economic education (PSHE). During these activities, we talked to subject leaders and teachers, visited lessons, reviewed pupils’ work

p.6

Inspection team

Martin Hanbury, lead inspector Ofsted Inspector

p.6

Inspection team

Claire Hollister Ofsted Inspector 10–11 March 2020

p.6

7

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.7

7

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.7

7

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

7

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

7

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion