Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

Ackworth Howard Church of England Voluntary Controlled Junior and Infant School

Inspected 12 Mar 2020 · published 24 Jun 2020 · URN 130977

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Requires improvement

Michele Costello (lead), Mary Lanovy-Taylor

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    12 Mar 2020

  • Inspectors verified

    Mary Lanovy-Taylor, Michele Costello

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Good

  • Early years verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Requires improvement

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Requires improvement

  • Personal development verified

    Good

  • Quality of education verified

    Requires improvement

  • Postcode verified

    WF7 7HH

  • Name on report verified

    Ackworth Howard Church of England Voluntary Controlled Junior and Infant School

  • URN verified

    130977

Page 1 of 8
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2016.

  • OverallRequires improvement
  • Behaviour and attitudesGood
  • Early yearsGood
  • Leadership and managementRequires improvement
  • Personal developmentGood
  • Quality of educationRequires improvement

15% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Requires improvement (5,043 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+20Mostly positivemore positive than 49% of reports of this type graded Requires improvement
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseenjoypositiveeffectiveclearstrongambitiousconfidentpolite
Criticismnot ambitiousgapsfalling behinddisruptionconcernsnot well plannednot well sequencedlimited

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1211w+25
  • Safeguarding120w−27
  • What needs to improve33w—

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
8
Words of findings
1,318
about usual (typical 1215)
Reading level
Plain English
Flesch 63, typical 56
Average sentence
12 words
Next steps
6
typical 5
Hedged sentences
10%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 63%Safeguarding 6%What needs to improve 2%About the inspection 29%

Full report text

Inspection of Ackworth Howard Church of England Voluntary Controlled Junior and Infant School Station Road, Low Ackworth, Pontefract, West Yorkshire WF7 7HH

p.1

Overall effectiveness Requires improvement

The quality of education Requires improvement Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Good Leadership and management Requires improvement Early years provision Good Previous inspection grade Good Junior and Infant School 11–12 March 2020

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

The school’s Christian vision underpins all aspects of school life. Most pupils enjoy school. They attend well and wear their uniforms with pride. Pupils feel safe. Bullying is rare. When it does happen, the vast majority of pupils are confident that bullying is dealt with promptly by staff.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils behave well. They are polite, well mannered and articulate. Pupils have positive attitudes towards their learning. Many pupils enjoy and take part in the wide range of clubs, trips and visits that the school offers.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Many pupils have leadership roles. They relish taking on extra responsibilities such as those of digital leaders, anti-bullying ambassadors and eco leaders. Pupils enjoy ‘family dining’ where they eat lunch with other year groups.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

The school has strong links with a school in Tanzania. This helps pupils to understand life beyond their own community. Pupils have raised funds to help build a classroom at their partner school. Pupils contribute to their local community. Pupils are involved in litter picking as part of the school’s eco council.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Children achieve well in the early years. However, teachers’ expectations of what pupils can and should achieve are not high enough in key stages 1 and 2. Pupils do not achieve as well as they should across the curriculum.

p.2

better?

Leaders are in the process of reviewing the curriculum. They have checked that curriculum plans cover the scope of the national curriculum. However, leaders have not ensured that these plans show the crucial knowledge, understanding and skills that pupils must learn. The curriculum has not been planned carefully enough. The order in which topics are taught in some subjects, such as history, do not help to build pupils’ knowledge so that they remember more over time.

p.2

better?

In mathematics, pupils do not achieve as well as they should. The curriculum is not ambitious enough. Teachers’ expectations are not high enough. Sometimes, problem-solving and reasoning activities are not completed or attempted by pupils. Teacher’s do not check sufficiently for gaps in pupils’ knowledge.

p.2

better?

The teaching of early reading is effective. Leaders ensure that the books that children learn to read match the sounds that they know. The school runs workshops for parents so that they can support their children at home. Leaders identify swiftly any pupil who is falling behind. They put support in place so that these pupils can catch up quickly. Reading is taught from the beginning of Reception. Teachers read daily to pupils. Pupils enjoy reading. Leaders ensure that all staff follow the school’s phonics programme. However, in key stage 1 and key stage 2 the reading curriculum Junior and Infant School 11–12 March 2020

p.2

3

is not well planned and thought out. As a result, pupils do not achieve as well as they should in reading by the end of key stage 2.

p.3

3

Pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) are mostly supported well. Yet, a few parents who responded to Ofsted’s parent survey, Parent View, do not feel that their children are well supported. Targets on some plans for pupils with SEND are not precise enough in identifying the small steps that pupils need.

p.3

3

Children in the early years are happy and well cared for. Adults are skilful at developing children’s language skills. Staff are passionate and committed to supporting children’s learning effectively. Most children are well prepared for the demands of Year 1.

p.3

3

Most pupils enjoy school. They attend well and are punctual. Pupils are very clear about the school’s rewards and sanctions system. They are keen to receive the many rewards on offer. Low-level disruption is not tolerated by staff.

p.3

3

Pupils show respectful and tolerant attitudes. They learn about different religions and cultures. Pupils understand the importance of British values. They know about democracy and justice. They are clear about the difference between right and wrong. Pupils learn about some of the risks within the local community. They know about road and online safety. However, they have a very limited understanding of the dangers of radicalisation and extremism.

p.3

3

Governors have a range of skills. They are committed to the school and visit the school regularly. However, governors have an over-generous view of the quality of education. They have not challenged leaders enough to improve the education that pupils receive. Governors are too accepting of what leaders tell them.

p.3

3

Staff are proud to work at the school. They are clear that leaders consider their well- being and workload. Staff morale is high.

p.3

3

The vast majority of parents hold positive views about the school. One parent reflected the views of many when describing the school as ‘warm and friendly’.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.3

Safeguarding

Leaders ensure that staff training is up to date. Leaders test out staff’s understanding of the training they have received through quizzes. Staff understand the risks that pupils may face in the local community. Staff know how to report any concerns. The school works with the local police to run workshops for pupils, staff and parents. Junior and Infant School 11–12 March 2020

p.3

4

However, some aspects of the school’s safeguarding processes are not as tight as they should be. For instance, pupils are not supported to be aware of all the risks to their safety in the locality. Pupils do not know about the dangers of radicalisation and extremism, grooming or county lines gangs.

p.4

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 Leaders have not thought carefully enough about the crucial content that pupils must learn in each subject. In too many subjects, the curriculum is not well sequenced or coherently planned. Consequently, pupils do not remember the crucial content required for future learning. Leaders should ensure that plans make clear the substantive and disciplinary knowledge that pupils should learn in each subject. Senior leaders should also ensure that curriculum leaders have the subject-specific expertise to check the implementation and impact of the curriculum.  The mathematics curriculum that leaders have planned is not ambitious enough. Teachers’ expectations of pupils are not high enough. Teachers do not have clear enough understanding of where pupils have gaps in their learning. Pupils do not achieve as well as they should in mathematics. Leaders should ensure that curriculum plans in mathematics are more ambitious. Leaders should make sure

p.4

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

that teachers identify gaps in pupils’ learning, and take the right steps to address them, so that pupils can apply their mathematical knowledge to increasingly more complex problems.  Some pupils with SEND do not achieve as well as they should. The targets on some plans are not precise enough about addressing the small steps that pupils need. Leaders should ensure that the targets for pupils with SEND are precise and understood by staff so that all pupils with SEND are supported to achieve well.  Although pupils are supported to identify a range of risks to their safety, they do not learn about the dangers of radicalisation or county lines gangs. This is because leaders do not ensure that this is covered as part of the school’s personal development curriculum. Leaders should ensure that pupils are aware of, and understand, all of the local risks that they may face.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use Ofsted Parent View information when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school. Junior and Infant School 11–12 March 2020

p.4

5

If you are the school and you are not happy with the inspection or the report, you can complain to Ofsted .

p.5

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.5

Further information

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. Junior and Infant School 11–12 March 2020

p.5

School details

Appropriate authority The governing body

p.6

School details

Date of previous inspection 11–12 May 2016, under section 5 of the Education Act 2005

p.6

Information about this school

 The headteacher was appointed after the previous inspection.  The proportion of pupils who are disadvantaged is well below the national average.  The proportion of pupils who have English as an additional language is well below the national average.  After the previous inspection, the school established its own Nursery.  The school had a section 48 inspection in June 2016.  The school runs its own breakfast and after-school clubs.

p.6

Information about this inspection

We carried out this inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005. Junior and Infant School 11–12 March 2020

p.6

7

 We met with the headteacher and the deputy headteacher, curriculum leaders, the special education needs coordinator and the early years leader. We also met with leaders responsible for safeguarding, behaviour, attendance and personal development. The lead inspector held a discussion with members of the governing body, including the chair of governors. The lead inspector held a telephone conversation with representatives from the local authority and the diocese.  We scrutinised a wide range of documentation relating to the school’s work to safeguard pupils. This included: pupil welfare records, behaviour and bullying records, pupil attendance records and the school’s recruitment procedures. We spoke to a number of staff members about the safeguarding training they receive.  We took account of the views of the 15 members of staff who responded to Ofsted’s staff survey and the 80 responses to Ofsted’s parent survey, Parent View.

p.7

7

We also took into account the 54 responses to Ofsted’ pupil survey. We spoke to pupils, both formally and informally, to get their views about the school. We spoke to parents at the start of the school day.  We carried out deep dives in reading, mathematics, history and Spanish. Other subjects were also considered as part of the inspection. We visited lessons, scrutinised pupils’ work and spoke to pupils, teachers and teaching assistants. We listened to some pupils read.

p.7

Inspection team

Michele Costello, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector

p.7

Inspection team

Mary Lanovy-Taylor Ofsted Inspector Junior and Infant School 11–12 March 2020

p.7

8

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.8

8

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.8

8

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.8

8

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.8

8

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.8

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion