Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

Bury Church of England High School

Inspected 26 Feb 2020 · URN 105365

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Stephanie Gill (lead), Craig Yates

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    26 Feb 2020

  • Inspectors verified

    Craig Yates, Stephanie Gill

  • Postcode verified

    BL9 0TS

  • Name on report verified

    Bury Church of England High School

  • URN verified

    105365

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−34Criticalmore positive than 5% of reports of this type
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisehigh expectationseffectiveoutstandingfeel safeconfidentstrengthssuccessfulwarm
Criticismconcernspoorweaknessesdecliningweaknot good enoughat riskserious

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1099w−33
  • Safeguarding102w−27

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
1,198
about usual (typical 1153)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 58, typical 55
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
6
typical 4
Hedged sentences
11%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 67%Safeguarding 6%About the inspection 27%

Full report text

Inspection of a good school: Bury Church of England High School Haslam Brow, Bury, Lancashire BL9 0TS

p.1

Outcome

Bury Church of England High School continues to be a good school. However, inspectors have some concerns that one or more areas may be declining, as set out below.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils do not achieve well in this school. In some subjects, pupils do not learn as much as they should. Some pupils do not have the knowledge that they need to succeed in external examinations or in later life.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

The pupils that we spoke to said that they feel safe in school. They get on well with one another. They said that staff work hard to resolve any problems that arise between pupils. Pupils told us that bullying is rare. They are confident that staff will deal with it well.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Staff have high expectations of pupils’ behaviour. However, there is a lack of consistency in how staff manage pupils’ behaviour. Staff and pupils told us that incidents of poor behaviour occur too often. This stops some pupils from enjoying their time at school.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils value the care they receive from staff. They take part in a wide range of extra- curricular clubs and sporting activities.

p.1

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

The acting headteacher has an accurate understanding of the school’s strengths and the areas that need to improve. Leaders, staff and governors recognise that the current curriculum is not ambitious enough. However, they have not determined the changes that they will make to improve the curriculum.

p.1

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

Weaknesses in the curriculum have not helped pupils to achieve well over time. Published data shows that pupils have made significantly less progress than other pupils nationally by the end of Year 11. The achievement of disadvantaged pupils is particularly weak. This is because leaders’ plans have not focused on the specific needs of these pupils.

p.1

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

In some subjects, teachers have considered what pupils need to know. They have carefully thought about the order in which subject content should be taught. In science, 25–26 February 2020

p.1

2

for example, teachers’ plans enable pupils to make links between topics. They develop their knowledge over time. In other subjects, such as design and technology, teachers have not identified the important knowledge that pupils need to learn. This means that pupils do not gain the knowledge that they need to be successful in examinations or for future learning.

p.2

2

When planning learning, some teachers do not think enough about how pupils learn. Teachers do not routinely use strategies that help pupils to remember more over time. In modern foreign languages, for example, older pupils could not remember what they had been taught about France or Germany.

p.2

2

Leaders have the same ambitions for pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) as they do for other pupils. Like other pupils, the achievement of pupils with SEND is affected by weaknesses in the design and delivery of the curriculum.

p.2

2

Pupils and staff talk to each other in a warm and respectful manner. However, pupils and staff told us that behaviour is not good enough, both in lessons and around school. Staff are not consistent in the way they deal with weaker behaviour. Leaders are in the process of revising their behaviour policy to address this.

p.2

2

The school’s aim is to develop pupils who are fulfilled, responsible and caring members of its Christian community. To achieve this, leaders place great value on the wider curriculum. Pupils enjoy learning about equality, citizenship and healthy relationships. They take on a range of leadership roles in school. These include becoming members of the school council and student leaders. Pupils regularly engage in fundraising for local and national charities. This is helping them to understand what it means to live in modern Britain.

p.2

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.2

Safeguarding

Leaders ensure that all members of staff undergo regular safeguarding training. Staff understand the procedures for raising concerns about pupils and how to record them effectively. Leaders ensure that careful checks have been made on the suitability of adults who work and volunteer in the school.

p.2

Safeguarding

Pastoral and learning support staff work closely together to identify and support pupils who are at risk. Staff understand the risks that exist in the local community. Leaders work with a range of outside agencies, including social care and the police, to ensure that pupils receive the help they need.

p.2

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 In some subjects, leaders have thought carefully about the knowledge and skills that pupils need to develop. In other subjects, however, leaders have focused only on the 25–26 February 2020

p.2

3

development of skills. They have not identified the important knowledge that pupils need to have. As a result, pupils, including those who are disadvantaged and those with SEND, have not achieved well in their GCSE examinations. Leaders should carefully consider the content of their curriculum plans so that pupils develop the knowledge and skills that they need to succeed. Leaders should design a curriculum which develops the essential knowledge pupils need to be educated citizens.  Teachers do not routinely plan learning that helps pupils to remember more over time. This means that pupils do not retain their knowledge as well as they could. Leaders should ensure that teachers plan and deliver the curriculum in a way that helps pupils to recall more of the content they have been taught over time.  Leaders are currently reviewing the school’s behaviour management systems. Pupils and staff report that there is too much low-level disruption in lessons and some poor

p.3

3

behaviour around the school. This is due to inconsistencies in the way that staff manage pupils’ behaviour. Leaders should ensure that all staff manage pupils’ behaviour in a consistent and effective way.

p.3

Background

When we have judged a school to be good, we will then normally go into the school about once every four years to confirm that the school remains good. This is called a section 8 inspection of a good or non-exempt outstanding school. We do not give graded judgements on a section 8 inspection. However, if we find some evidence that standards may be declining, then the next inspection will be a section 5 inspection. Usually this is within one to two years of the date of the section 8 inspection. If we have serious concerns about safeguarding, behaviour or the quality of education, we will convert the section 8 inspection to a section 5 inspection immediately.

p.3

Background

This is the second section 8 inspection since we judged the school to be good on 6–7 December 2011.

p.3

How can I feed back my views?

find out what other parents and carers think. We use Ofsted Parent View information when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.3

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.3

How can I feed back my views?

If you are the school and you are not happy with the inspection or the report, you can complain to Ofsted .

p.3

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school. 25–26 February 2020

p.3

4

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 25–26 February 2020

p.4

School details

Appropriate authority The governing body

p.5

School details

Chair of governing body Mr Lawrence Yarwood

p.5

School details

Headteacher Mrs Tina Astley (Acting Headteacher)

p.5

School details

Date of previous inspection 28 June 2016

p.5

Information about this school

 At present, this school does not have any pupils at an alternative provision.  The school was inspected under section 48 in March 2017.

p.5

Information about this inspection

 During the inspection, we met with the headteacher, senior leaders, subject leaders, teachers and support staff.  We met with a number of governors including the chair of governing body.  We spoke with pupils about life at school and their work.  We met with a representative of the local authority.  We examined a range of school documentation. This included leaders’ curriculum plans, the school’s self-evaluation and improvement plans. We scrutinised records of pupils’ behaviour.  We reviewed a range of information about safeguarding, including the school’s records of checks undertaken for newly appointed staff and records of support provided to pupils. We examined the single central record. 25–26 February 2020

p.5

6

 We considered the 71 responses to Parent View, Ofsted’s online questionnaire. This included 49 free-text responses. We considered the 46 responses to the staff survey and the 189 responses to the pupil survey.  We did deep dives in the following subjects: science, design and technology and modern foreign languages. This involved meetings with subject leaders, visits to lessons, work scrutiny, and discussions with teachers and groups of pupils from the lessons visited.

p.6

Inspection team

Stephanie Gill, lead inspector Ofsted Inspector

p.6

Inspection team

Craig Yates Ofsted Inspector 25–26 February 2020

p.6

7

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.7

7

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.7

7

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

7

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

7

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion