Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

Benfield School

Inspected 4 Mar 2020 · published 5 Jun 2020 · URN 144271

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    4 Mar 2020

  • Inspectors verified

    Bernard Clark, Chris Fletcher, John Downs, Lee Elliott, Michael Reeves

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Requires improvement

  • Leadership and management verified

    Requires improvement

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Requires improvement

  • Personal development verified

    Good

  • Quality of education verified

    Requires improvement

  • Postcode verified

    NE6 4NU

  • Name on report verified

    Benfield School

  • URN verified

    144271

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallRequires improvement
  • Behaviour and attitudesRequires improvement
  • Leadership and managementRequires improvement
  • Personal developmentGood
  • Quality of educationRequires improvement

15% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Requires improvement (5,043 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+34Mostly positivemore positive than 69% of reports of this type graded Requires improvement
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisestrongeffectivevery effectivehappypositivefeel safeeffectivelythriving
Criticismpoorlyweaknessesdisruptdisruptionvariablebelowexclusionstoo many

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1159w+27
  • Safeguarding100w+66
  • What needs to improve40w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
1,273
about usual (typical 1215)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 55, typical 56
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
1
typical 5
Hedged sentences
11%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 61%Safeguarding 5%What needs to improve 2%About the inspection 32%

Full report text

Inspection of Benfield School Benfield Road, Newcastle upon Tyne, Tyne and Wear NE6 4NU

p.1

Overall effectiveness Requires improvement

The quality of education Requires improvement Behaviour and attitudes Requires improvement Personal development Good Leadership and management Requires improvement Sixth-form provision Requires improvement

p.1

Overall effectiveness Requires improvement

Previous inspection grade Not previously inspected under section 5 of the Education Act 2005 3–4 March 2020

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

There are many aspects of the school’s work that are improving. A lot of the recent changes in the school are well overdue. Pupils in key stages 4 and 5 have underachieved for some time. There are signs that the quality of education that pupils receive is stronger now.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils are happy in the school. They know their teachers want the best for them. Relationships between most pupils and teachers are positive. Changes to the school’s curriculum of late are leading to more teachers thinking about how pupils learn. This is leading to teachers asking more of pupils in the classroom. Pupils say they feel safe and there is little bullying in the school. There are a considerable number of safeguarding leaders who are experienced and visible. However, pupils’ behaviour in the classroom and corridors is variable. Pupils say this can disrupt their learning.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

The large number of pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) are fully integrated into the life of the school. These pupils receive very effective care and support.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

There is a strong tradition of sport and creative arts in the school. Pupils and staff regularly participate in school productions such as ‘We Will Rock You’.

p.2

better?

Until recently, the curriculum in each subject was not carefully planned. Pupils jumped from one topic to the next without much thought from leaders about why or how each topic linked together. This, in part, has contributed to pupils’ progress at the end of key stages 4 and 5 being well below the national average. For example, when leaving the school at the end of Year 11 or 13, pupils have achieved over half a grade below other pupils nationally for the past two years. During this time, pupils in Year 11 have achieved particularly poorly in the core subjects of English, mathematics and science.

p.2

better?

The appointments of a new headteacher and a new governing body within the past 18 months have brought a fresh outlook on matters. Together, they know the school well. New systems and ways of working are beginning to have a positive effect on pupils’ behaviour, curriculum planning and leadership across the school. Even so, pupils’ behaviour requires further improvement. Fixed-period and permanent exclusions are high. Staff and pupils report that too many lessons continue to be disrupted by low-level noise and chatter. Some teachers do not use the agreed behaviour sanctions when dealing with pupils who misbehave. This leads to a minority of pupils behaving well in some lessons but not in others.

p.2

better?

The new headteacher has ensured that curriculum leaders and staff have thought carefully about what they want to teach pupils and when. There are now more opportunities for pupils to recap their prior learning. Similarly, pupils are 3–4 March 2020

p.2

3

remembering more for longer because new concepts and ideas are more familiar to pupils. This is because new schemes of work ensure that learning is progressively harder and/or similar in content to pupils’ earlier work.

p.3

3

The most able pupils in the school are capable of much more than they are currently being asked to do. Leaders know that more training is needed to ensure that staff use assessment effectively to gauge how well pupils are doing, particularly the most able pupils.

p.3

3

Pupils with SEND receive effective support in the classroom and the additional resource centre (ARC), known as the Cherrywood Centre. The special educational needs coordinator is knowledgeable and provides strong leadership. Staff have a thorough understanding of the starting points and additional needs of pupils with SEND. These pupils benefit from specialist staff support and resources to help them succeed. Pupils with SEND say they are happy in the school. They told inspectors that staff are helpful and supportive. At breaktimes, pupils with SEND, in the ARC, mix with other pupils in a pleasant and friendly manner.

p.3

3

Provision to develop pupils’ personal development is a clear strength of the school. Leaders think really carefully about how they can introduce opportunities for pupils to become involved in new initiatives and projects. For example, the school has a thriving ‘no bystanders’ project whereby pupils pledge to learn about and reduce intolerance in the school. Furthermore, the school is an ‘early-adopter’ of the Relationships and Sex Education (RSE) curriculum. This means pupils learn how to improve their well-being, look after their health and how to develop responsible relationships in preparation for adult life.

p.3

3

Post-16 students are now receiving more appropriate information relating to course choices in the sixth form. This, and more stringent entry requirements, mean that students study courses that are more closely matched to their ability and future career aspirations. Leaders know there is further work to do to ensure that students develop independence and improve their study skills to achieve well in the future.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.3

Safeguarding

There are nine designated safeguarding leaders in the school. They and other staff are well trained and have a thorough understanding of the risks pupils face in ‘NE6’. Leaders liaise closely with the police and NHS and social care professionals to ensure that pupils receive swift and effective care or support when needed.

p.3

Safeguarding

Pupils say they feel safe in the school. They learn how to steer clear of potentially risky situations when using social media. Girls learn about period poverty. School leaders ensure that all girls have access to sanitary products. 3–4 March 2020

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 Over time, curriculum plans have lacked cohesion and assessment has not been used effectively to amend schemes of work or lesson planning when needed. Key stages 4 and 5 pupils have underachieved across a range of subjects for several years. Leaders should ensure that they continue to develop or amend existing curriculum plans so that pupils learn important content in a systematic and sequential way that contributes to them achieving much more over time. Furthermore, leaders should ensure that they train staff to use assessment policies more consistently and effectively, allowing staff to identify pupils’ strengths and weaknesses. Leaders should ensure that curriculum leaders and teachers plan sequences of lessons over time that more precisely meet the needs of pupils from their different starting points, particularly the most able.  Fixed-term and permanent exclusions are high. Also, low-level disruption is too

p.4

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

common. Some teachers do not follow consistently the school’s agreed behaviour policy or sanctions. Some pupils are frustrated because they cannot learn as well as they might and some teachers are frustrated because they cannot teach as well as they could. Leaders must ensure that all teachers follow the behaviour sanctions as set out in the school’s behaviour policy. At the same time, leaders and staff must insist that pupils follow instructions swiftly and reduce the number of times lessons are disrupted by low-level noise and chatter.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use Ofsted Parent View information when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

If you are the school and you are not happy with the inspection or the report, you can complain to Ofsted .

p.4

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.4

Further information

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 3–4 March 2020

p.4

School details

Inspection number 10121892 Type of school Secondary comprehensive

p.5

sixth form

Date of previous inspection Not previously inspected

p.5

Information about this school

 Benfield School is part of Newcastle East Mixed Academy Trust (NEAT).  A new headteacher took up post in September 2018.  The board of trustees delegate some monitoring functions to a local governing board (LGB). A new chair of the LGB was appointed in April 2019. Nearly all members of the LGB were appointed within the past 18 months.  The proportion of pupils with SEND or who have an education, health and care plan is much higher than the national average.  The school has additionally resourced provision for pupils with social and communication difficulties and autism. It also has additional resourced provision for pupils with a physical or medical disability. All of these pupils are integrated into mainstream lessons.  A higher than average number of pupils are added to or taken off the school’s roll at times other than the normal admission date. 3–4 March 2020

p.5

Information about this inspection

We carried out this inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.6

Information about this inspection

 We undertook deep dives into mathematics, science, geography and modern foreign languages. To do this, we met with subject leaders and visited a sample of lessons in these subjects. We also scrutinised pupils’ books and other kinds of work produced by pupils who were part of the classes we visited. In addition, we had discussions with teachers and a group of pupils from the lessons observed.  We met senior and subject leaders, teachers, including those new to the profession, trustees, governors and the chief executive officer of the trust in addition to administrative and support staff.  An inspector spoke on the telephone with staff from one alternative provider and an intermediary who brokers work placements for pupils from the school.  We scrutinised pupils’ work during lessons and with subject leaders.  The lead inspector considered one letter from a parent.  We held informal and formal discussions with many pupils and observed

p.6

Information about this inspection

interactions during social times.  We observed the work of the school and scrutinised a wide range of evidence, including the school’s planning documents, behaviour and attendance records, safeguarding files and recruitment checks.  We took into account the 47 responses from parents and carers who completed Parent View, Ofsted’s online questionnaire. There were six responses from pupils to the pupil survey and 44 responses to the staff questionnaire.

p.6

Inspection team

Lee Elliott, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector

p.6

Inspection team

John Downs Ofsted Inspector 3–4 March 2020

p.6

7

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.7

7

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.7

7

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

7

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

7

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion