Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School monitoring visit

Setting

Inspected 10 Mar 2020 · published 18 May 2020

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    10 Mar 2020

  • Postcode verified

    HU5 5QG

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−11Mixedmore positive than 21% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectiveconsistentlyeffectivelyaccurateimprovingambitioussafepositive
Criticismpoorinconsistenttoo manyseriousweaknessespersistently absentfall behindinconsistency

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improveLeadership positive critical
  • Findings170w−60
  • Leadership455w+7
  • What needs to improve964w−8

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
1,581
about usual (typical 1570)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 43, typical 47
Average sentence
19 words
Next steps
8
typical 8
Hedged sentences
4%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 10%Leadership 27%What needs to improve 57%About the inspection 6%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Janine King Wold Academy Wold Road Hull HU5 5QG

p.1

Serious weaknesses first monitoring inspection of Wold Academy

Following my visit to your school on 10 March 2020, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the outcome and inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions that have been taken since the school’s most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Serious weaknesses first monitoring inspection of Wold Academy

The inspection was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to have serious weaknesses in July 2019. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Serious weaknesses first monitoring inspection of Wold Academy

Following the monitoring inspection, the following judgements were made:

p.1

Serious weaknesses first monitoring inspection of Wold Academy

Leaders and managers are taking effective actions towards the removal of the serious weaknesses designation.

p.1

Serious weaknesses first monitoring inspection of Wold Academy

The school’s improvement plan is fit for purpose.

p.1

Serious weaknesses first monitoring inspection of Wold Academy

The trust’s statement of action is fit for purpose.

p.1

Serious weaknesses first monitoring inspection of Wold Academy

I am copying this letter to the chair of the board of trustees and the chief executive officer of the multi-academy trust, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Kingston-upon-Hull City Council. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.1

The areas for improvement identified during the inspection that took

■ Urgently improve the effectiveness of safeguarding procedures by ensuring that swift referrals are made to appropriate external agencies, and followed up where necessary, to ensure that pupils receive the support they need to keep them safe. ■ Improve the effectiveness of leadership and management by ensuring that: ̶ leaders are accurate in their evaluation of the school’s performance, including how well all pupils are learning over time ̶ improvement plans are focused on improving pupils’ progress and leaders are held to account effectively for implementing the plans ̶ senior and middle leaders receive professional development to enable them to thoroughly check the quality of teaching and take suitable actions to improve it swiftly ̶ a suitable system is in place to evaluate how well pupils are learning in a range of subjects beyond English and mathematics. ■ Improve the quality of teaching, learning and assessment, including in the early

p.3

The areas for improvement identified during the inspection that took

years, and improve pupils’ outcomes by ensuring that: ̶ teaching staff have appropriate subject knowledge in all the subjects they teach ̶ teaching identifies and addresses pupils’ gaps in learning, misconceptions and errors effectively in all subjects ̶ pupils apply age-appropriate handwriting and English grammar, punctuation and spelling skills consistently in their writing in all subjects. ■ Improve the personal development, behaviour and welfare of pupils by ensuring that: ̶ the curriculum prepares pupils for life in modern Britain by developing a better understanding of how others live their lives ̶ attendance improves for the minority of pupils who are persistently absent ̶ pupils’ conduct around the school is consistently calm and considerate of others ̶ pupils demonstrate consistently positive attitudes to learning in the classroom and take pride in all aspects of their work. `

p.3

Evidence

The inspector observed the school’s work, scrutinised documents and met with the principal; a deputy designated safeguarding leader; the subject leaders for English, religious education (RE) and personal, social and health education (PSHE); a group of early years, key stage 1 and key stage 2 teachers; the chair of the academy scrutiny committee, one of the trust’s regional directors, the trust’s director of primary education and pupils in classrooms.

p.4

Context

The academy scrutiny committee has been strengthened by the addition of a principal from another school in the trust. A vice-principal has been seconded to the school from a trust school.

p.4

improvement identified at the section 5 inspection

Leaders have adopted the trust’s core knowledge curriculum (CKC) throughout the school. The implementation of the CKC is at an early stage. It is stronger in some subject areas, such as RE, than in others.

p.4

improvement identified at the section 5 inspection

Teachers and teaching assistants understand the crucial importance of developing and widening pupils’ vocabulary alongside the acquisition of knowledge and skills. Although very recent, the school’s work on vocabulary is beginning to have an impact in upper key stage 2. For example, pupils in Year 6 are using a much wider range of vocabulary now than they were at the beginning of the academic year.

p.4

improvement identified at the section 5 inspection

Senior leaders have ensured that all staff in the early years and key stage 1 have attended a two-day training course in the school’s chosen phonics scheme. However, standards in Year 1 are not as high as they should be. Too many pupils, who are just learning to read, do not arrive at school on time. As a result, they miss their phonics lessons on a regular basis. They fall behind their peers and are unable to access the planned curriculum because of poor reading skills.

p.4

improvement identified at the section 5 inspection

Leaders have prioritised the development of pupils’ handwriting and presentation. Children in the Reception Year are forming their letters correctly and are beginning to place them on the line correctly. In key stages 1 and 2, pupils’ handwriting and presentation skills remain inconsistent. Where teachers’ expectations are high, pupils use a beautiful joined handwriting script and present their work well. This is not the case throughout the school.

p.4

improvement identified at the section 5 inspection

The curriculum leaders for RE and PSHE have taken assertive action to improve pupils’ first-hand knowledge of how others live their lives. For example, pupils have ` visited another primary school in Hull. At this new partnership school, the majority of pupils speak English as an additional language compared to a very small proportion at Wold Academy. Pupils enjoy the half-termly debates that the curriculum leaders have established. Consequently, they are knowledgeable about current affairs, such as the development of a hijab by an international sportswear company. Curriculum leaders have implemented the schemes of work for RE and PSHE and, consequently, pupils are receiving a better quality of education.

p.4

improvement identified at the section 5 inspection

Leaders have improved pupils’ behaviour and their attitudes to learning. Simple routines and practices have been established and are paying dividends. For example, teachers and teaching assistants are now visible in the corridors as pupils travel around the school. As a result, there are far fewer incidents of poor behaviour during the less-structured times of the school day.

p.5

improvement identified at the section 5 inspection

The actions taken by leaders to improve pupils’ attendance are bearing fruit. More pupils attend school every day. The number who are persistently absent is reducing.

p.5

The effectiveness of leadership and management at the school

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective. Leaders acted quickly to improve the culture of safeguarding in the school following the last inspection. The trust’s initial audit of safeguarding was supplemented by an external audit of safeguarding in September 2020. The external audit found safeguarding at Wold Academy to be ‘compliant, effective and thorough’. Systems and procedures have been strengthened. For example, all safeguarding records are now kept online. Leaders analyse the records, identify most trends and report to the academy scrutiny committee. They have ensured that all staff know what to do if they see signs of radicalisation and extremism.

p.5

The effectiveness of leadership and management at the school

Leaders, teachers and teaching assistants understand the trust’s CKC. All benefited from training delivered recently by one of the trust’s trustees (an acknowledged expert in implementing a knowledge-based approach to curriculum planning) on the development of a knowledge-rich curriculum. Senior leaders are ambitious for their pupils. They are determined that pupils will build up a store of knowledge, skills and vocabulary to prepare them well for secondary schooling. Teachers and teaching assistants value highly the training they have attended since the previous inspection, especially the training on the acquisition of vocabulary.

p.5

The effectiveness of leadership and management at the school

Leaders have taken action to address teachers’ workload. Curriculum leaders value the non-contact time they are allocated to lead developments in their subjects. For example, the curriculum leader for English uses her non-contact time wisely to improve the quality of education provided for pupils through modelling and coaching. She has an accurate view of the quality of education in her subject and acknowledges that improvements remain inconsistent across the school. Senior leaders acknowledge that this inconsistency is typical across subjects. ` Leaders’ evaluation of the school’s effectiveness is accurate and based on up-to- date evidence. The school’s improvement plans and the trust’s statement of action are detailed. Both include timescales by which actions need to be carried out, together with the arrangements to monitor and evaluate their impact.

p.5

The effectiveness of leadership and management at the school

Members of the academy scrutiny committee challenge the principal and senior leaders during visits to the school. For example, recently, they have asked how persistent absence is monitored, how many educational visits there have been to non-Christian places of worship and why too many pupils in Year 1 do not achieve the standard in the phonics screening check. The chair of the academy scrutiny committee is pleased that the school’s rate of improvement has quickened this term.

p.6

The effectiveness of leadership and management at the school

The trust’s director of primary, chief executive officer and chair of trustees are ‘all over’ the academy’s progress. The trust has brokered successful senior leadership secondments. In addition, the trust arranged weekly visits by an assistant principal from one of their northern schools. The assistant principal works with subject leaders to improve the provision in the subjects they lead.

p.6

Strengths in the school’s approaches to securing improvement:

 Leaders are working proactively with the trust and the local authority to improve the provision for children in the early years. As a result, the provision is improving rapidly.  Pupils have noticed that their peers’ behaviour is improving. They say that they can concentrate in lessons and are safe and secure in and around school.  Staff at all levels understand the trust’s CKC. Pupils are beginning to acquire the knowledge, skills and vocabulary required to succeed at secondary schooling.

p.6

Weaknesses in the school’s approaches to securing improvement:

 Not enough has been done to ensure that pupils arrive punctually for school. Too many pupils are late and miss their phonics and reading lessons.  Despite staff attending phonics training, the delivery of the school’s chosen scheme of work is inconsistent across classes.  Pupils’ spelling remains poor.  The numbers of behaviour incidents are not analysed regularly. Leaders are missing a vital opportunity to measure the impact of their actions.

p.6

External support

Officers from the local authority have worked in partnership with the trust to improve the provision for children in the early years. `

p.6

future success, should priorities for further improvement be added

 Leaders should work with parents and carers to ensure that the proportion of pupils who arrive on time for school increases.

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion