Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · Independent school inspection

Alex Park Democratic School

Inspected 11 Mar 2020 · URN 146337

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Eileen Mulgrew

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    11 Mar 2020

  • Inspectors verified

    Eileen Mulgrew

  • Postcode verified

    M16 8PH

  • Name on report verified

    Alex Park Democratic School

  • URN verified

    146337

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+43Positivemore positive than 54% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectivelyindependentconsistentlymake good progresshigh-qualityswiftlyenthusiasticpositive
Criticismunacceptableconcerninsufficientunevennot clearly

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveLeadershipAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1282w+29
  • Leadership62w+67
  • What needs to improve61w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
1,364
shorter than usual (typical 1813)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 54, typical 49
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
3
typical 8
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 64%Leadership 3%What needs to improve 3%About the inspection 30%

Full report text

School progress monitoring inspection report

p.1

Alex Park Democratic School Demesne Road, Whalley Range, Manchester M16 8PH

p.1

Main inspection findings

Part 1. Quality of education provided Paragraph 2(1)(a), 2(1)(b)(i)  This standard was identified as unmet at the standard inspection in June 2019. This was because the proprietor had not made sure that curriculum plans and schemes of work (SoW) were adapted effectively to take account of the full range of pupils’ prior attainment and capabilities. Nor had the plans and SoW taken account of the needs of pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND). Pupils made uneven progress in reading, writing and mathematics.  In the evaluation of the school’s action plan in September 2019, it was found that the proposed timescales for leaders’ planned actions to meet the standard were not realistic. This was because the planned actions did not stipulate clearly enough how they would use the SoW to improve the progress of pupils in reading, writing and mathematics.  In the evaluation of the school’s second action plan in December 2019, it was found that

p.1

Main inspection findings

leaders had detailed many actions to improve the quality of education. However, the actions did not focus on pupils’ acquisition of knowledge sharply. Leaders did not set out how the plans and SoW would enable pupils to make good progress.  Leaders were devastated that the action plan was again deemed to be unacceptable. However, they responded swiftly.  The new curriculum policy is logical and reflects the distinctive nature of the school. It covers all the requirements of the independent school standards. The policy is supported by SoW which support teachers in planning pupils’ learning effectively. It reflects how the curriculum will be adapted to meet the needs and aptitudes of all pupils.  Leaders thought carefully about what they wanted pupils to know by the time they left the school in reading, writing and mathematics, and set about reviewing the SoW. They worked methodically to knit together the subjects in the National Curriculum with the

p.1

Main inspection findings

demands of the democratic curriculum. Each SoW for reading, writing and mathematics has end points in line with those expected in the National Curriculum for the different stages within the school. In this way, the SoW set out the increased expectations for pupils as they move through the school. The SoW are organised into three documents which reflect the three age phases in the school: Years 1 and 2, Years 3 and 4, and Years 5 and 6. Each SoW sets out learning in order so that pupils build knowledge in logical steps. Each document highlights how the planning will be adapted for pupils with SEND. Additionally, staff have reviewed pupils’ individual education plans so that the objectives set support pupils’ learning. Staff take these objectives into consideration when planning lessons.  Class teachers use the SoW to map out the specific knowledge and skills pupils need to know, and use this information in weekly planning.

p.1

Main inspection findings

 Each SoW is accompanied by a tracking document which staff use to check pupils’ progression through each subject. Staff use this, and summaries of pupils’ learning over a six-week block, to report to parents and carers on how their children are doing.  The sample of pupils’ books I looked at show that pupils are writing more and over a range of genres. Mathematics books show a clearer progression of skills. This is a big improvement. Pupils used to complete worksheets which restricted their chance to practise their writing and calculation skills. Written feedback to pupils links to what they need to do next to improve. Pupils’ work is much neater and tidier.  A new library area is well stocked with a variety of new, high-quality books. Pupils are more enthusiastic about reading. Staff guide pupils to choose books which increase their vocabulary and challenge their thinking. Pupils are heard to read more regularly.

p.2

Main inspection findings

 Teachers are now using one programme to teach phonics, so pupils are learning sounds and new vocabulary systematically. Further training for staff in the teaching of phonics is planned.  As a consequence of the actions taken by the headteacher and staff, pupils are doing much better in reading, writing and mathematics.  Leaders have ensured that the standard in this part, checked in this inspection, is now met.

p.2

Main inspection findings

Part 3. Welfare, health and safety of pupils Paragraphs 7, 7(a), 7(b), 32(1)(c)  At the start of the inspection, the school’s safeguarding policy was not showing on the website. However, leaders realised that this was due to a technical issue and it was resolved swiftly.  The proprietors updated the school’s safeguarding policy in September 2019 so that it reflects the latest government guidance. All staff were updated on the policy. It provides clear information for staff and others on what action to take should a safeguarding concern arise.  Leaders share the regular updates received from the local authority to keep staff’s knowledge fresh.  The policy is now available for parents and others from the school’s website.  Leaders have ensured that the standard in this part, checked in this inspection, is now met. Part 8. Quality of leadership in and management of schools Paragraph 34(1), 34(1)(a), 34(1)(b)

p.2

Main inspection findings

 This standard was identified as unmet during the June 2019 inspection because senior staff and proprietors had not ensured that all the independent school standards were consistently met.  The school’s action plan in September 2019 identified a range of actions which would establish appropriate oversight from leaders and the proprietors. However, it did not detail how any increased monitoring would impact on the pupils’ quality of education.  The evaluation of the school’s second action plan in December 2019 found that there was insufficient detail about the planned completion of actions. This made it difficult to know when leaders expected the necessary changes to be fully in place.  The proprietor, the headteacher and staff are steadfast in their resolve to make sure the school meets the independent school standards.  Action to improve pupils’ progress in reading, writing and mathematics is starting to

p.3

Main inspection findings

make a difference.  Appointing a new teacher for English has added to the subject expertise within the school. The new teacher has brought a wealth of experience gained in maintained schools. Expectations of pupils are higher. Pupils have more pride in their work.  The headteacher sought advice from a headteacher of a local maintained primary school. Using this external support and guidance has had a positive impact on leadership and management. Vital processes are in place for checking the effectiveness of the school.  A monitoring and evaluation timetable is in place so that leaders follow a systematic process of checking that the SoW and tracking system are having the intended impact in lessons. The headteacher has observed teachers in class, scrutinised pupils’ workbooks and met with pupils to hear their views. She has used this information to review the action plan and to inform an evaluation of the school’s effectiveness.

p.3

Main inspection findings

 The school does not have a governing body. However, the headteacher uses the expertise of the headteacher from a local school to provide challenge, as well as support. This is working well.  Leaders have ensured that the standard in this part, checked in this inspection, is now met.

p.3

Compliance with regulatory requirements

The school meets the requirements of the schedule to the Education (Independent School Standards) Regulations 2014 (‘the independent school standards’) and associated requirements that were checked during this inspection. This included the standards and requirements that the school was judged to not comply with at the previous inspection. Not all of the standards and associated requirements were checked during this inspection.

p.4

Part 1. Quality of education provided

 2(1) The standard in this paragraph is met if - - 2(1)(a) the proprietor ensures that a written policy on the curriculum, supported by appropriate plans and schemes of work, which provides for the matters specified in sub-paragraph (2) is drawn up and implemented effectively; and

p.4

Part 1. Quality of education provided

- 2(1)(b)(i) take into account the ages, aptitudes and needs of all pupils, including those pupils with an EHC plan.

p.4

Part 8. Quality of leadership in and management of schools

 34(1) The standard about the quality of leadership and management is met if the proprietor ensures that persons with leadership and management responsibilities at the school- - 34(1)(a) demonstrate good skills and knowledge appropriate to their role so that the independent school standards are met consistently;

p.4

Part 8. Quality of leadership in and management of schools

- 34(1)(b) fulfil their responsibilities effectively so that the independent school standards are met consistently.

p.4

School details

This inspection was carried out under section 109(1) and (2) of the Education and Skills Act 2008, the purpose of which is to advise the Secretary of State for Education about the school’s suitability for continued registration as an independent school.

p.5

School details

Annual fees (day pupils) £4,212 – £6,435

p.5

School details

Email address Susanna.lopez@alexandraparkclc.co.uk

p.5

School details

Date of previous standard inspection 18–20 June 2019

p.5

Information about this school

 Since the last inspection, a new teacher has joined the school.

p.5

Information about this inspection

 This inspection was carried out at the request of the registration authority for independent schools. The purpose of the inspection was to monitor the progress the school has made in meeting the independent school standards that it was judged to not comply with at its previous inspection.  The previous standard inspection was carried out in June 2019. At that time, the school was judged to not comply with the independent school standards.  The school was asked to prepare an action plan. The plan was evaluated by Ofsted in September 2019. This plan was not approved by the Department for Education (DfE).  The school was asked to prepare a second action plan. This was evaluated in December 2019 and was not approved by the DfE.  This inspection was conducted without notice to the school and was the first progress monitoring inspection.  I met with the headteacher, who is a proprietor, and the other proprietor, and one class

p.6

Information about this inspection

teacher. I met with the headteacher from a local maintained primary school who is working with the headteacher.  I visited lessons and spoke with pupils.  I looked at policies, schemes of work, weekly planning and examples of pupils’ work.  I examined the school’s safeguarding policy.

p.6

Inspection team

Eileen Mulgrew, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector guidance ‘Raising concerns and making a complaint about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/publications/complaints-about-ofsted . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.6

Inspection team

Parent View You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.

p.7

Inspection team

You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk , or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.gov.uk/ofsted .

p.7

Inspection team

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.

p.7

Inspection team

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

Inspection team

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

Inspection team

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion