Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)
Valley Park School
Summary
Yasmin Maskatiya (lead), Anne Turner, Ian Bauckham, Mark Roessler, Peter Swan, Steve Baker
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
5 Mar 2020
- Inspectors verified
Anne Turner, Ian Bauckham, Mark Roessler, Peter Swan, Steve Baker, Yasmin Maskatiya
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Good
- Overall effectiveness verified
Good
- Personal development verified
Good
- Quality of education verified
Good
- Postcode verified
ME14 5DT
- Name on report verified
Valley Park School
- URN verified
136581
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2013.
- OverallGood
- Behaviour and attitudesGood
- Leadership and managementGood
- Personal developmentGood
- Quality of educationGood
66% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Good (5,043 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- They are very successful in reaching ambitious destinations. p.3
- The previous ’outstanding’ judgement reflected the school’s overall effectiveness in April 2013 under the relevant inspection framework at that time. p.1
- The long time between inspections is because the law changed in 2011; it made outstanding schools exempt from routine inspection. 4–5 March 2020 p.1
- Teachers have high expectations of what each pupil should achieve. p.2
- As a result, they have achieved very well in their examinations. p.3
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- However, disadvantaged pupils do not make the progress that they should. p.3
- Trust leaders ensure that the school has the resources it needs to improve. p.3
- Leaders need to check, monitor and adjust where necessary to consolidate and secure the intended improvements in the curriculum delivery. p.4
- Leaders need to act to help these pupils to participate and feel proud to belong to Valley Park so that they widen their horizons and develop themselves as individuals. p.4
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Teaching & assessment10
“Teachers have high expectations of what each pupil should achieve.” p.2Progress & outcomes7
“Teachers have high expectations of what each pupil should achieve.” p.2Wellbeing & mental health2
“Staff say that leaders show consideration about their well-being and workload.” p.3
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 1,305
- about usual (typical 1098)
- Reading level
- Plain English
- Flesch 63, typical 55
- Average sentence
- 13 words
- Next steps
- 4
- typical 4
- Hedged sentences
- 9%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of Valley Park School Huntsman Lane, Maidstone, Kent ME14 5DT
p.1
Overall effectiveness Good
The quality of education Good Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Good Leadership and management Good Sixth-form provision Good Previous inspection grade Outstanding
p.1
Overall effectiveness Good
The previous ’outstanding’ judgement reflected the school’s overall effectiveness in April 2013 under the relevant inspection framework at that time.
p.1
Overall effectiveness Good
The new judgement of ‘good’ reflects the current inspection framework as well as any changes at the school since the last inspection.
p.1
Overall effectiveness Good
The school has not been inspected for seven years, which is longer than the five- year maximum interval between inspections. Changes in school effectiveness may have happened at any point in that period. The long time between inspections is because the law changed in 2011; it made outstanding schools exempt from routine inspection. 4–5 March 2020
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils at Valley Park School take their learning very seriously. They work hard in their lessons, always trying their best. Teachers have high expectations of what each pupil should achieve. They make sure that pupils receive the right guidance to help them succeed.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils’ behaviour is of a very high standard. They mix well with each other, showing mutual respect. As a result, the community is one where bullying seldom happens. If it does happen, most pupils are confident that staff will resolve the problem. A few are not so sure that all teachers will act in the same consistent way.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Most pupils feel happy and safe at school. They know where they can go if they need help. Some pupils feel that they would like more support to deal with what worries them.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils have a wide range of activities on offer. Teachers encourage them to take part in giving back to the community. An example of this is the very successful ‘Dementia Café’. Pupils themselves run this event for people affected by the condition. Pupils also love taking part in the frequent drama productions. The recent performance of ‘Legally Blonde’ had been a huge success, pupils told us.
p.2
better?
The headteacher took up her post at the beginning of the academic year. She straightaway set about making improvements to the school’s curriculum. Leaders have carried out a thorough revision of all subject plans. They have focused on improving the level of challenge in what pupils learn. They have also ensured that the curriculum is broad and has a logical sequence. Pupils study a wide range of subjects. Leaders ensure that all pupils cover the full key stage 3 curriculum over their first two years at the school. Leaders have also insisted on a broad curriculum for all at key stage 4. A high proportion of pupils study the GCSE subjects that make up the English Baccalaureate (EBacc). The school ensures that pupils can also take vocational and arts subjects as well. Indeed, these are some of the most successful areas of the curriculum.
p.2
better?
Leaders have worked well to get the curriculum to this point. Leaders’ key priority now is to ensure that pupils remember and use the knowledge they learn. They are supporting teachers to do this through targeted professional development. Teachers are sharpening their questioning and have introduced strategies to improve pupils’ reading skills and widen their vocabulary. These improvements are at an early stage and delivery is not yet consistent.
p.2
better?
Pupils are diligent and conscientious in their lessons. All pupils conduct themselves with maturity. Teachers have strong subject knowledge which gives pupils confidence in what they learn. Teachers check for gaps in understanding. Pupils act well on feedback they receive. This is a strength of the school’s practice. Most pupils 4–5 March 2020
p.2
3
achieve well, acting on suggestions for improvement. Leaders have had a positive impact on pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND). Staff have achieved this through thoughtful and well-judged support. However, disadvantaged pupils do not make the progress that they should. Leaders have plans to tackle this, but they have yet to put these strategies into action.
p.3
3
The school offers a wide range of personal development opportunities. For instance, pupils have access to a farm on site. They are also able to take part in a host of sports and arts events. Despite this rich offer, less than half of the pupils take part. As a result, leaders have made it a priority to encourage more participation. Although the school offers varied activities, there are still some gaps. For instance, pupils do not receive enough guidance about equality and diversity.
p.3
3
The sixth form is a strength of the school. Students have a broad set of courses to choose from. The teaching is strong, and students show mature commitment to their studies. As a result, they have achieved very well in their examinations. Students speak highly of the careers guidance they receive. They are very successful in reaching ambitious destinations.
p.3
3
Leaders are well respected by staff. They share the vision for the school that the headteacher has shaped with them. Staff say that leaders show consideration about their well-being and workload. Governors check and support leaders’ impact on the school’s priorities. Trust leaders ensure that the school has the resources it needs to improve. All leaders are aware that a key priority is to engage more pupils in the wider life of the school. Thereby making sure that all pupils feel satisfied by their experience at school.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.
p.3
Safeguarding
Leaders have appropriate systems in place for safeguarding. Records for those who work at the school are well organised. Staff have all been trained to spot the signs to look out for if they are worried about a pupil. The safeguarding team have plenty of experience working with pupils and their families. They know their responsibilities and work together to support the needs of vulnerable pupils. Leaders place an increasing emphasis on support for pupils with mental health issues.
p.3
Safeguarding
While safeguarding processes are secure, some pupils said that they would like better opportunities to voice their concerns.
p.3
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
The school’s curriculum is not yet fully coherently planned and sequenced in some subjects. However, it is clear from the actions that leaders have already taken to plan the curriculum and train staff in how to deliver it that they are in the process 4–5 March 2020
p.3
4
of bringing this about. Leaders need to check, monitor and adjust where necessary to consolidate and secure the intended improvements in the curriculum delivery. For this reason, the transition arrangement has been applied in this case. Leaders have made clear their intention to raise the level of achievement for all pupils, but especially for disadvantaged pupils. Leaders have had early impact on reducing the absence rate for this group of pupils. Now the priority is to put in place a set of actions that will result in better outcomes for disadvantaged pupils. Many pupils are positively engaged in the wider life of the school. They feel safe and well supported. However, there is a minority who are not so well engaged and do not feel happy. Leaders need to act to help these pupils to participate and feel proud to belong to Valley Park so that they widen their horizons and develop themselves as individuals.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use Ofsted Parent View information when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
If you are the school and you are not happy with the inspection or the report, you can complain to Ofsted .
p.4
Further information
You can search for published performance information about the school.
p.4
Further information
In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 4–5 March 2020
p.4
provision
Number of pupils on the school roll 1,620
p.5
sixth form
Date of previous inspection 18–19 April 2013
p.5
Information about this school
The current headteacher has been in post since September 2019. The senior leadership team has undergone significant changes which have been put in place since February 2020.
p.5
Information about this inspection
We carried out this inspection under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. We deemed the inspection a section 5 inspection under the same Act.
p.5
Information about this inspection
The previous ’outstanding’ judgement reflected the school’s overall effectiveness in April 2013 under the relevant inspection framework at that time.
p.5
Information about this inspection
The new judgement of ‘good’ reflects the current inspection framework as well as any changes at the school since the last inspection. 4–5 March 2020
p.5
6
The school has not been inspected for seven years, which is longer than the five- year maximum interval between inspections. Changes in school effectiveness may have happened at any point in that period. The long time between inspections is because the law changed in 2011; it made outstanding schools exempt from routine inspection.
p.6
6
I reviewed the school’s safeguarding arrangements. I looked at relevant documentation, staff recruitment checks and training. I also considered how well adults in the school act on emerging concerns about pupil welfare. We spoke with pupils, parents and staff to gather their views. We considered 310 responses to Ofsted’s online survey, Parent View, 544 submissions to Ofsted’s pupil questionnaire and 89 staff survey replies. We held meetings with members of the local school board and with the trust’s chief executive officer. We did deep dives in these subjects: English, mathematics, science, art and modern foreign languages. This involved talking with senior leaders, subject leaders and class teachers about how these subjects are delivered. Inspectors then visited a range of lessons to see this in action, talked to pupils about what they have learned and looked at their work.
p.6
Inspection team
Yasmin Maskatiya, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector
p.6
Inspection team
Anne Turner Ofsted Inspector 4–5 March 2020
p.6
7
regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.7
7
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.7
7
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.7
7
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.7
7
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion