Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)
Arnold Mill Primary and Nursery School
Summary
Hazel Henson (lead), Sarah Chadwick, Steve Varnam
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
5 Mar 2020
- Inspectors verified
Hazel Henson, Sarah Chadwick, Steve Varnam
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Good
- Early years verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Good
- Overall effectiveness verified
Good
- Personal development verified
Good
- Quality of education verified
Good
- Postcode verified
NG5 7AX
- Name on report verified
Arnold Mill Primary and Nursery School
- URN verified
122720
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2014.
- OverallGood
- Behaviour and attitudesGood
- Early yearsGood
- Leadership and managementGood
- Personal developmentGood
- Quality of educationGood
66% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Good (5,043 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The previous ‘outstanding’ judgement reflected the school’s overall effectiveness in October 2014 under the relevant inspection framework at that time. p.1
- The long time between inspections is because the law changed in 2011; it made outstanding schools exempt from routine inspection. 4–5 March 2020 p.1
- Pupils feel behaviour has improved and that staff use the behaviour system consistently. p.2
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- However, some of the younger pupils who need to catch up are not doing so quickly enough. p.2
- Teachers have identified what children still need to learn to be ready for Year 1. p.2
- They understand exactly what they need to teach pupils next. p.2
- Teachers know what pupils need to learn next in mathematics. p.3
- Governors keep their safeguarding training up to date so that they understand the actions that leaders should be taking. p.3
- Leaders should ensure that the writing curriculum is coherently sequenced for all pupils. 4–5 March 2020 p.3
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Leadership & governance12
“Leaders are ambitious for children in early years.” p.2Reading & phonics5
“The teaching of early reading is systematic and rigorous.” p.2Staff development3
“Staff receive regular training.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 1,218
- about usual (typical 1098)
- Reading level
- Plain English
- Flesch 66, typical 55
- Average sentence
- 14 words
- Next steps
- 6
- typical 4
- Hedged sentences
- 12%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of Arnold Mill Primary and Nursery School Cross Street, Arnold, Nottingham, Nottinghamshire NG5 7AX
p.1
Overall effectiveness Good
The quality of education Good Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Good Leadership and management Good Early years provision Good Previous inspection grade Outstanding
p.1
Overall effectiveness Good
The previous ‘outstanding’ judgement reflected the school’s overall effectiveness in October 2014 under the relevant inspection framework at that time.
p.1
Overall effectiveness Good
The new judgement of ‘good’ reflects the current inspection framework as well as any changes at the school since the last inspection.
p.1
Overall effectiveness Good
The school has not been inspected for over five years, which is longer than the five- year maximum interval between inspections. Changes in school effectiveness may have happened at any point in that period. The long time between inspections is because the law changed in 2011; it made outstanding schools exempt from routine inspection. 4–5 March 2020
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
There is a buzz about school life at Arnold Mill Primary School. Relationships between pupils and staff are strong. There are many opportunities for pupils to be creative and active. Pupils like the way that staff make learning fun. For example, all staff dress up on World Book Day, share stories and act them out in assembly.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils feel that they are listened to and parents and carers agree. Pupils say that bullying and name-calling are rare. They say that, when it is dealt with, it stops. Pupils feel behaviour has improved and that staff use the behaviour system consistently. Pupils know that some of their peers need more help to behave well but feel that this is fair.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Staff want all pupils to be ready for the next stage of their learning. They expect them to present their work neatly and be proud of what they can do. They encourage them to become resilient learners. Most pupils leave the school well prepared for secondary education. However, some of the younger pupils who need to catch up are not doing so quickly enough.
p.2
better?
Leaders are ambitious for children in early years. Children learn about topics which excite them, such as rainforests and space. Children get off to a rapid start in phonics. They remember the sounds that they have learned and use these to write words in their ‘Supertato’ books. No time is wasted in mathematics either, as children in the Nursery learn about numbers and what they are worth. Adults help children to solve problems, such as building a trap for ‘Evil Pea’. Through well- chosen questions, they encourage children to think more deeply. Teachers have identified what children still need to learn to be ready for Year 1. However, not all activities that they organise help children to gain this knowledge in all subjects.
p.2
better?
The teaching of early reading is systematic and rigorous. Staff receive regular training. They understand exactly what they need to teach pupils next. Leaders have made sure that pupils get help to catch up in phonics. They check that it is making a difference. Older pupils learn important background information before they begin to read. Pupils understand the vocabulary that is in more complex texts. This helps them to make sense of more demanding passages. Pupils learn to justify their answers. Work is challenging but adapted well to support pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND).
p.2
better?
The writing curriculum is not implemented as consistently. Teachers have high expectations. They plan work to help pupils apply their knowledge of spelling and grammar. By the end of key stage 2, pupils write fluently and with creative flair. However, teachers do not consistently identify the gaps in knowledge that some pupils in key stage 1 have. They do not adapt what they are teaching well enough to help some of the younger pupils catch up quickly. 4–5 March 2020
p.2
3
Teachers know what pupils need to learn next in mathematics. They plan work so that pupils become fluent and understand how numbers work. Pupils use what they know effectively to solve problems. All staff are committed to a broad curriculum. They are proud of pupils’ achievements in art, for example. Pupils gain a wide range of skills that build on what they learned before. They use this knowledge to create their own pieces. Their achievements are celebrated through vibrant displays and recognition in assembly. Pupils, including those who are disadvantaged and those with SEND, achieve well. Leaders have reviewed what they are teaching in all subjects. They found out that, in some subjects, pupils do not gain the knowledge that they need in the right order. Subject leaders are improving this, but this is at an early stage in some subjects.
p.3
3
Leaders want pupils to be active and responsible citizens who care for the world around them. Pupils relish the chance to be house captains and to work together to entertain older members of the community. They have made sure that pupils with SEND and disadvantaged pupils can take part in clubs and the wider curriculum. Staff plan opportunities to help pupils become more resilient. Pupils learn to take risks and trust each other during outdoor learning. For example, pupils read out loud in turn during ‘forest schools’. Pupils respect each other’s difference and learn about a range of faiths. They feel that they show friendship to pupils from all backgrounds.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.
p.3
Safeguarding
Leaders have made sure that pupils learn about the dangers that they might face in the local environment. They make sure that teachers adapt what they are teaching to prepare pupils well. Pupils learn about how to keep themselves safe online. Leaders make sure that all staff have had training and know what to do if they are concerned about the well-being of a child.
p.3
Safeguarding
Leaders make sure that they record any concerns. They refer them in a timely manner. Governors keep their safeguarding training up to date so that they understand the actions that leaders should be taking.
p.3
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
The improvements that leaders are making to the writing curriculum in key stage 1 are at an early stage of development. Teachers do not always plan work which helps pupils gain key knowledge that they have not yet understood. Some younger pupils, including a small proportion of pupils with SEND, do not catch up with their peers quickly enough. Leaders should ensure that the writing curriculum is coherently sequenced for all pupils. 4–5 March 2020
p.3
4
The curriculum in some subjects is not yet coherently planned and sequenced. Sometimes teachers do not identify well enough what the key knowledge is that they want pupils to gain. Leaders have begun to address this. They have clear plans in place to improve these subjects further and these are beginning to make a difference. For this reason, the transition arrangement has been applied in this case.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use Ofsted Parent View information when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
If you are the school and you are not happy with the inspection or the report, you can complain to Ofsted .
p.4
Further information
You can search for published performance information about the school.
p.4
Further information
In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 4–5 March 2020
p.4
School details
Local authority Nottinghamshire County Council
p.5
School details
Inspection number 10121314 Type of school Primary
p.5
School details
Appropriate authority The governing body
p.5
School details
Date of previous inspection 8–9 October 2014
p.5
Information about this school
Many leaders are new to their roles since the previous inspection. The headteacher, deputy headteacher and coordinator for special educational needs started in their posts in September 2019. The chair of governors took up his position in November 2019
p.5
Information about this inspection
We met with the headteacher, leaders in early years and key stage 1 and the coordinator for pupils with SEND. We met governors and spoke with a representative from the local authority. We spoke with a range of staff and met with groups of pupils. We spoke with parents at the beginning of the school day. We did deep dives in these subjects: reading, mathematics, writing and geography. We spoke with subject leaders, staff and pupils. We visited lessons and scrutinised a sample of pupils’ work. We looked at records of training that staff had received about safeguarding. We spoke with staff and pupils. We considered a range of records which leaders keep. We looked at records of the checks that leaders make before adults begin to work with pupils. 4–5 March 2020
p.5
Inspection team
Hazel Henson, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector
p.6
Inspection team
Steve Varnam Her Majesty’s Inspector 4–5 March 2020
p.6
7
regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.7
7
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.7
7
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.7
7
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.7
7
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion