Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

St Mary's RC Primary School

Inspected 4 Mar 2020 · published 13 May 2020 · URN 105250

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    4 Mar 2020

  • Inspectors verified

    Elizabeth Stevens, Lesley Curtis

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Good

  • Early years verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Good

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Personal development verified

    Good

  • Quality of education verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    BL6 6EP

  • Name on report verified

    St Mary’s RC Primary School

  • URN verified

    105250

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2009.

  • OverallGood
  • Behaviour and attitudesGood
  • Early yearsGood
  • Leadership and managementGood
  • Personal developmentGood
  • Quality of educationGood

66% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Good (5,043 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+46Positivemore positive than 28% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseenjoyoutstandingeffectiveconfidentimprovinghappyengagingwell prepared
Criticismlackgapsat riskconcernsfalling behindnot happynot precise

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1179w+52
  • Safeguarding109w−9

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
1,258
about usual (typical 1098)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 59, typical 55
Average sentence
13 words
Next steps
6
typical 4
Hedged sentences
8%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 61%Safeguarding 6%About the inspection 33%

Full report text

Inspection of St Mary’s RC Primary School Victoria Road, Horwich, Bolton, Lancashire BL6 6EP

p.1

Overall effectiveness Good

The quality of education Good Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Good Leadership and management Good Early years provision Good Previous inspection grade Outstanding

p.1

Overall effectiveness Good

The previous ‘outstanding’ judgement reflected the school’s overall effectiveness in February 2009 under the relevant inspection framework at that time.

p.1

Overall effectiveness Good

The new judgement of ‘good’ reflects the current inspection framework as well as any changes at the school since the last inspection.

p.1

Overall effectiveness Good

The school has not been inspected for 11 years, which is longer than the five-year maximum interval between inspections. Changes in school effectiveness may have happened at any point in that period. The long time between inspections is because the law changed in 2011; it made outstanding schools exempt from routine inspection. 3–4 March 2020

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils and staff agree that this is a happy and welcoming school. Pupils and their families are greeted by staff as they arrive each morning. The pupils told us that they enjoy school. They described their teachers as kind and helpful. Staff help pupils to achieve the school’s mission statement, ‘We care, we pray, we work, we play in Jesus’ way.’

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Staff provide a wide range of support to ensure that pupils achieve well. This includes pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND). In 2019 at the end of key stage 2, pupils’ attainment in reading, writing and mathematics was higher than that of pupils nationally.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils told us how much they enjoy the many trips that leaders provide. They are excited to learn about French culture, including staying in a chateau, visiting a French market and eating traditional French food. Through their links with other schools, pupils described how they make friends with children with different religions. Pupils learn to appreciate diversity.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils typically behave well. They play well together, enjoying the new playground chill and relax area. Pupils said that bullying is rare. They are confident that staff listen to any concerns they have.

p.2

better?

Leaders have planned a broad and engaging curriculum. Pupils are well prepared for their next stage of education, including pupils with SEND. They develop skills and knowledge across a range of subjects.

p.2

better?

Reading lies at the heart of the school’s curriculum. Teachers share a wide range of books with pupils. The proportion of pupils who met the Year 1 phonics screening check was well above the national average in 2019. Children start learning phonics as soon as they start in the Reception class. Teachers make regular checks on how well pupils are learning. They make sure that teaching builds on the letters and sounds that pupils already know. Pupils have plenty of practice in reading. Reading books match pupils’ reading ability. Pupils falling behind in their reading are given a range of effective support to help them catch up. Pupils leave the school as confident and fluent readers. They enjoy reading and read for pleasure.

p.2

better?

Leaders have revised curriculum planning to ensure that pupils develop a secure understanding of topics and concepts. Subject plans build on pupils’ previous learning. For example, in design technology, across different year groups, pupils increase their knowledge of nutrition. In mathematics, staff plan with care the steps that pupils need to develop their written calculation skills. 3–4 March 2020

p.2

3

Leaders have ensured that the school is resourced well. Pupils enjoy the wide range of practical activities that teachers plan. For example, in history, a trip to a museum helped pupils deepen their understanding of Egyptians. In science, children in Reception took great care planting seeds as part of their topic on growing. For pupils with SEND, staff plan activities which match pupils’ abilities.

p.3

3

In subjects including mathematics and computing, teachers have identified what knowledge they want pupils to know and remember. In some subjects, leaders are improving the details that curriculum plans include. Some staff do not have detailed knowledge about the curriculum in year groups other than their own.

p.3

3

In mathematics and English, staff make very regular checks on pupils’ learning. They use these checks to plan a wide range of support to ensure that pupils do not fall behind. In some subjects, leaders are improving the checks that they make on pupils’ learning within that subject. This is to help staff identify any gaps that pupils may have in their understanding.

p.3

3

Through a variety of leadership roles, pupils develop their character. Pupil chaplains spoke with pride about their charitable fundraising and visits to the elderly. Science ambassadors lead whole-school science activities. Pupils enjoy regular residential trips, with adventurous activities such as climbing and archery. Pupils develop as thoughtful and independent individuals.

p.3

3

Leaders have ensured that the school’s curriculum helps pupils understand how to stay healthy. Visitors to school help pupils understand about mental health, including how to relax. Pupils enjoy meditation sessions. They value the wide variety of sports activities, including netball, cricket and cross-country running.

p.3

3

Pupils behave well. They are polite and welcoming to visitors. During our visit, children in Reception listened carefully to adults. In lessons, pupils are keen to produce their best work. They work cooperatively and contribute to class discussions.

p.3

3

Staff enjoy working at the school. They told us that leaders are supportive. Staff appreciate the regular opportunities they have to develop their skills. For example, teachers work with staff from other schools to develop their expertise.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.3

Safeguarding

Staff have regular training. This means they know how to check for signs that a pupil may be at risk. Leaders work with professionals to ensure that pupils get support when needed. Leaders check the staff recruited to work in school to ensure that they pose no threat to pupils.

p.3

Safeguarding

Staff and visitors to school teach pupils about the risks that they might face. Pupils learn how to stay safe when using technology. Pupil road safety ambassadors help 3–4 March 2020

p.3

4

pupils learn about road safety. Pupils know that they should speak to an adult in school if they are concerned about anything.

p.4

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 In some subjects, leaders are improving curriculum plans. This is because some curriculum plans lack precision about the knowledge and skills leaders want pupils to acquire. Leaders need to ensure that teachers have a good understanding of the most important content of the curriculum that they want pupils to acquire.  In some subjects, teachers lack detailed knowledge about how the curriculum progresses from start to end points. This means that in year groups other than their own, staff are not aware of the steps that pupils need to make in their learning. Leaders should develop teachers’ understanding of the curriculum sequencing across key stages and year groups. They should ensure that teachers use this understanding when planning.  Systems to check pupils’ learning are not developed in some curriculum areas. This means that teachers do not have precise information about gaps in pupils’ learning.

p.4

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

Leaders need to ensure that effective checks are in place which can be used by teachers to develop pupils’ learning.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use Ofsted Parent View information when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

If you are the school and you are not happy with the inspection or the report, you can complain to Ofsted .

p.4

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.4

Further information

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 3–4 March 2020

p.4

School details

Inspection number 10122150 Type of school Primary

p.5

School details

Appropriate authority The governing body

p.5

School details

Website www.st-marys-horwich.bolton.sch.uk

p.5

School details

Date of previous inspection 25 February 2009

p.5

Information about this school

 A new headteacher has been appointed since the previous inspection.  The school had a section 48 inspection on 28 November 2019.

p.5

Information about this inspection

We carried out this inspection under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. We deemed the inspection a section 5 inspection under the same Act.

p.5

Information about this inspection

The previous ‘outstanding’ judgement reflected the school’s overall effectiveness in February 2009 under the relevant inspection framework at that time.

p.5

Information about this inspection

The new judgement of ‘good’ reflects the current inspection framework as well as any changes at the school since the last inspection.

p.5

Information about this inspection

The school has not been inspected for 11 years, which is longer than the five-year maximum interval between inspections under section 5 of the Education Act 2005. Changes in school effectiveness may have happened at any point in that period. The long time between inspections is because the law changed in 2011; it made most outstanding schools exempt from routine inspection. 3–4 March 2020

p.5

6

 We met with the headteacher and deputy headteacher. We held a meeting with five governors.  We met with the coordinator of the provision for pupils with SEND and with the early years leader.  We checked the school’s safeguarding policies and procedures and the school’s single central record. We met with leaders, staff and pupils to check how effective safeguarding is in school.  We met with a representative of the local authority and a representative of the diocese.  We met with parents and carers at the school gate to seek their views. We also considered 62 responses to Parent View, Ofsted’s online questionnaire for parents, including free-text responses. We considered one written response from a parent.  During the inspection, we met with groups of pupils, including pupils with SEND, and we observed lunchtimes and breaktimes.  We examined a range of documents. These included: the school’s development

p.6

6

plans and self-evaluation documents; minutes of the governing body meetings; and safeguarding documentation.  We met with leaders to discuss pupils’ attendance and behaviour.  We considered 49 responses to Ofsted’s survey for pupils and 28 responses to Ofsted’s survey for staff.  Design technology, reading, mathematics and science were considered as part of this inspection. Inspection activities included: discussions with leaders; visits to lessons; discussions with teachers; scrutiny of pupils’ work; and discussions with pupils about their learning. In reading, we observed members of staff listening to pupils read.  We also met with the subject leaders for art and design, computing and history. We scrutinised work in these subjects.

p.6

Inspection team

Elizabeth Stevens, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector

p.6

Inspection team

Lesley Curtis Ofsted Inspector 3–4 March 2020

p.6

7

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.7

7

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.7

7

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

7

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

7

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion