Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)
UTC Swindon
Summary
Iain Freeland (lead), Martin Bennett
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
4 Mar 2020
- Inspectors verified
Iain Freeland, Martin Bennett
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Good
- Overall effectiveness verified
Requires improvement
- Personal development verified
Good
- Quality of education verified
Requires improvement
- Postcode verified
SN1 5ET
- Name on report verified
UTC Swindon
- URN verified
145155
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.
- OverallRequires improvement
- Behaviour and attitudesGood
- Leadership and managementGood
- Personal developmentGood
- Quality of educationRequires improvement
15% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Requires improvement (5,043 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Requires improvement.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Across the subjects, pupils’ writing is weak. p.2
- They write relatively little and their spelling, punctuation and grammar are poor. p.2
- Similarly, staff too readily accept poorly presented work or work that is not complete. p.2
- Their work is poorly organised, and teachers’ expectations of pupils’ writing are not high enough. p.4
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Records & policies4
“Many pupils struggle to record their thoughts in writing.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 1,203
- about usual (typical 1215)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 56, typical 56
- Average sentence
- 15 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 10%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of UTC Swindon Bristol Street, Swindon, Wiltshire SN1 5ET
p.1
Overall effectiveness Requires improvement
The quality of education Requires improvement Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Good Leadership and management Good Sixth-form provision Good
p.1
Overall effectiveness Requires improvement
Previous inspection grade Not previously inspected under section 5 of the Education Act 2005 3–4 March 2020
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils enjoy attending UTC Swindon. They attend regularly, are punctual and are smartly dressed. In most classes, pupils behave well and show positive attitudes and genuine interest in their studies. Pupils have chosen to attend the college because of its engineering and digital technology specialisms. Their learning is enriched through the high-quality resources available in the college and in the vast network of local and national employers that the college works with. Pupils particularly value the projects and assignments that employers set and the visits to various workplaces.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
At breaks and lunchtime, the college is a calm and orderly place. Pupils, and their parents, comment on the good behaviour. Pupils report that bullying is very rare. Where there are any unkind behaviours, the vast majority of pupils comment how well staff work with pupils to resolve these. Consequently, relationships between pupils are positive. The number of exclusions has fallen sharply.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
The quality of education is not yet good enough. The curriculum plans are well thought through and include many interesting, often practical, activities. However, in some classes, they are not always enacted well. Teachers pay too little attention on the basics of writing well and basic mathematics calculations, such as times tables, across subjects.
p.2
better?
Across subjects, staff have planned their courses well. These allow pupils to build their subject knowledge over time. However, the quality of education is too variable.
p.2
better?
Many pupils struggle to record their thoughts in writing. Across the subjects, pupils’ writing is weak. They write relatively little and their spelling, punctuation and grammar are poor. Teachers do not insist on the same high standards as they do when pupils are completing practical tasks. Similarly, staff too readily accept poorly presented work or work that is not complete. Teachers assess pupils’ work regularly, but they do not insist that pupils finish tasks or make corrections.
p.2
better?
Reading has not been prioritised within the college. Some staff shy away from asking pupils to read aloud as pupils are not confident readers. Very few pupils read for pleasure. Leaders are aware of this and have set out their expectations, but this has not been rolled out to staff or pupils yet.
p.2
better?
Teachers do not have the precise information they need about pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND). The information they have is heavily focused on pupils’ personal development and too little on their academic needs. As a result, learning is not planned well enough to meet these pupils needs.
p.2
better?
Over recent years, outcomes at the end of key stage 4 and the sixth form have been low. Current pupils are doing much better, although they are still not achieving as highly as they should. 3–4 March 2020
p.2
3
Leaders have worked tirelessly to improve the college’s work. This has been most successful in their work with employers. High-quality work experience placements, visits to employers, assignments that local and national employers have set, and mentoring have enhanced the college’s work no end. Pupils engage fully in these and employers are delighted with UTC Swindon pupils. Pupils develop the personal attributes that employers are looking for. Consequently, the proportion of pupils who go on to apprenticeships in engineering or digital technology is high. Increasingly, sixth-form students are securing higher or degree apprenticeships. Similarly, year on year an increasing number of students carry on to undergraduate degrees at university. This is a good reflection of the high-quality careers advice and guidance that pupils receive.
p.3
3
The personal professional development course that all pupils follow prepares them well to survive and succeed in life. They learn about how to manage their money, particularly when they do not have much. They also gain some insight to different religions and cultures although this is not as strong as it should be. Pupils do not show a strong understanding of the world around them, now or in the past. Although some subject teachers try to include this in their teaching, there is no clear plan for developing an understanding or appreciation for this.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.
p.3
Safeguarding
Pupils are taught well about the risks that they might face in the community and online. This helps them to devise strategies to avoid harm.
p.3
Safeguarding
Staff are suitably trained in safeguarding. They are aware of their role in keeping pupils safe and use their training to identify when things might not be quite right in a pupils’ life. Leaders are effective in supporting pupils who need help. They work with the local authority and follow the procedures well. When other agencies do not respond quickly enough, college staff chase them up to make sure that pupils and their families get the support they need.
p.3
Safeguarding
Occasionally, records are not as well organised as they might be. Leaders are aware of this and are seeking to improve their record-keeping to reflect the good practice that is taking place. 3–4 March 2020
p.3
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
Pupils struggle to write down what they know. Their work is poorly organised, and teachers’ expectations of pupils’ writing are not high enough. This means that pupils do not fully express all that they know or understand. Leaders should ensure that the school’s common approach to literacy is fully implemented to ensure that pupils write well and express themselves clearly and accurately. The quality of education within and across subjects is too variable. This is leading to weaker outcomes in some classes and subjects than others. Leaders should take action to ensure that teachers receive the support and training they need so that the quality of teaching consistently meets leaders’ own high expectations. Teaching is often not matched well enough to the abilities of pupils with SEND. Teachers do not have the information they need about the specific needs that these pupils have. Leaders should make sure that teachers have sufficient detail
p.4
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
about the particular needs that pupils with SEND have. Leaders should also make sure that staff have the knowledge and training they need in subject-specific approaches to meet these pupils’ needs. Due to the college’s specialism and curriculum design, much of pupils’ knowledge about the wider world, now and over time, is embedded in the curriculum through subjects. However, this is not as effective as it should be. Leaders should ensure that pupils have the cultural capital that they need to deepen their understanding and appreciation of the world around them.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use Ofsted Parent View information when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
If you are the school and you are not happy with the inspection or the report, you can complain to Ofsted .
p.4
Further information
You can search for published performance information about the school.
p.4
Further information
In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 3–4 March 2020
p.4
School details
School category University technical college
p.5
sixth form
Chair of trust Sally Dicketts and Lee Nicholls
p.5
sixth form
Date of previous inspection Not previously inspected
p.5
Information about this school
UTC Swindon is a university technical college located in Swindon town centre. The school is part of Activate Learning Education Trust, a group of secondary schools, university technical colleges and a studio school in the Thames Valley. It is sponsored by Activate Learning. The school does not use alternative providers. The proportion of disadvantaged pupils is slightly below the national average. The proportion of pupils with SEND is higher than that typically found in secondary schools nationally. 3–4 March 2020
p.5
Information about this inspection
We carried out this inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.6
Information about this inspection
We met with the principal, senior leaders, curriculum leaders and class teachers. The lead inspector met with four trustees and three members of the local governing committee and the trust’s chief executive officer. We did deep dives in the following subjects: engineering, English, mathematics and science. These included discussions with subject leaders; visits to lessons; looking at examples of pupils’ work; discussions with teachers and discussions with pupils. We reviewed the school’s records of safeguarding checks and referrals to the local authority. We spoke with staff about how they keep pupils safe. We also asked the pupils about how they keep themselves safe and what to do if they have concerns. We observed pupils at breaktime and lunchtime. Inspectors took account of the views of the 33 parents who completed the Parent View survey. We also considered the views of 10 members of staff who completed
p.6
Information about this inspection
Ofsted’s online survey. The views of the 17 pupils who completed the pupil survey were taken into account.
p.6
Inspection team
Iain Freeland, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector
p.6
Inspection team
Martin Bennett Ofsted Inspector 3–4 March 2020
p.6
7
regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.7
7
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.7
7
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.7
7
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.7
7
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion