Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

University of Plymouth

Inspected 5 Mar 2020 · published 7 May 2020 · URN 133865

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    5 Mar 2020

  • Postcode verified

    PL4 8AA

  • Name on report verified

    University of Plymouth

  • URN verified

    133865

Page 1 of 5
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+47Positivemore positive than 48% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisehighly effectivesafeclearambitiousstrengthsenjoywell supportedskilfully
Criticismslowconcernsinsufficientbelownot clear

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No next steps set out.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
5
Words of findings
1,043
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 31, typical 45
Average sentence
20 words
Next steps
0
typical 5
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

University of Plymouth Monitoring visit report

p.1

Name of lead inspector: Roger Pilgrim Ofsted Inspector

p.1

Type of provider: Higher education institution

p.1

Address: Drake Circus Plymouth PL4 8AA Monitoring visit: University of Plymouth, 4–5 March 2020

p.1

Context and focus of visit

From October 2018, Ofsted undertook to carry out monitoring visits to all newly directly funded providers of apprenticeship training provision which began to be funded from April 2017 or after by the Education and Skills Funding Agency and/or the apprenticeship levy. This monitoring visit was undertaken as part of those arrangements and as outlined in the Further education and skills inspection handbook, especially the sections entitled ‘Monitoring visits’ and ‘Monitoring visits to providers that are newly directly publicly funded’. The focus of these visits is on the themes set out below.

p.2

Context and focus of visit

At the time of the monitoring visit, there were 131 apprentices studying on a level 5 nursing associate apprenticeship standard. The first cohort of apprentices started in September 2018 and they are due to complete their end-point assessments during the summer of 2020. All of the apprentices are based in the south-west of England.

p.2

Reasonable progress

Leaders have worked collaboratively with employers, such as the directors of nursing within the healthcare trusts, to develop a clear strategy for the apprenticeship programme for nursing associates. This ensures that the programme meets the needs of these employers, adheres to the requirements of the Nursing and Midwifery Council and provides new career opportunities for many apprentices who had previously been healthcare assistants and seeking opportunities for promotion.

p.2

Reasonable progress

Leaders and managers have designed the apprenticeship programme with sufficient time for worthwhile off-the-job training. This includes one day each week for an academic programme at the university that provides the knowledge requirements of a foundation degree. In addition, apprentices’ experience and knowledge are enhanced through shadowing experienced nursing practitioners on work placements and rotations between different departments.

p.2

Reasonable progress

Leaders and managers ensure that apprentices are well taught by very well-qualified and highly experienced health care professionals. Managers ensure that lecturing staff remain up to date with their clinical knowledge and teaching skills.

p.2

Reasonable progress

A range of governance and quality assurance processes ensure that leaders and managers are clear about the strengths and areas for improvement within the apprenticeship provision. However, managers have been slow to ensure that Monitoring visit: University of Plymouth, 4–5 March 2020 university staff monitor the apprentices’ progress at work frequently enough. As a result, apprentices made slow progress early in their apprenticeship.

p.2

Reasonable progress

Apprentices develop highly effective nursing skills, knowledge and behaviours in a wide range of settings, such as child health, district nursing and end-of-life care. They apply their new skills and knowledge well in the workplace and, as a result, they are quickly given additional responsibilities on their wards. For example, apprentices are formulating patient care reports, identifying pain indicators and taking responsibility for bays on wards.

p.3

Reasonable progress

Apprentices enjoy their learning and are well supported by their tutors. They are motivated and highly ambitious and see the apprenticeship as a valuable opportunity for career progression and, in many cases, they aspire to become registered nurses.

p.3

Reasonable progress

The university staff work very closely with the clinical settings to plan a well- sequenced academic curriculum that supports the apprentices’ practical skill development on the wards.

p.3

Reasonable progress

Lecturers monitor the academic progress of apprentices carefully and provide good feedback that supports academic improvements. They use questioning skilfully so that apprentices understand the relevance of the theories they learn and can apply these in the workplace. Lecturers offer thorough feedback to apprentices on their written assignments, which helps them to improve their knowledge and writing skills. As a result, almost all of the year one apprentices passed their first year and progressed onto their second year.

p.3

Reasonable progress

University staff, particularly in the early part of the implementation of the programme, did not review apprentices’ progress in the work place frequently enough or in sufficient detail. As a result, they did not have a clear enough understanding of apprentices’ overall progress on the apprenticeship programme. Recently, the review of apprentices’ progress has improved. However, apprentices, including those in the second year, still do not have a sufficient understanding of the requirements of their final assessment.

p.3

Reasonable progress

Apprentices are safe and feel safe. They have a good understanding of how to keep themselves and their patients safe and know who to report any concerns to. Monitoring visit: University of Plymouth, 4–5 March 2020 Apprentices are trained well by employers and university staff in safe working practices, including infection control.

p.3

Reasonable progress

Leaders and managers demonstrate a clear commitment to safeguarding and implement appropriate policies and procedures to keep apprentices safe. They identify potential risks to apprentices of radicalisation and extremism and apply policies and procedures to mitigate these risks. However, apprentices receive insufficient training on how to keep safe online and their understanding of the dangers of radicalisation is not reinforced sufficiently.

p.4

Reasonable progress

Managers ensure staff receive appropriate training and regular updates regarding safeguarding. The designated safeguarding lead is highly experienced in safeguarding matters and is trained to an appropriate level. When they appoint new staff, managers carry out checks to ensure that they are safe to work with apprentices. Monitoring visit: University of Plymouth, 4–5 March 2020 regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding

p.4

Reasonable progress

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.5

Reasonable progress

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.5

Reasonable progress

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.5

Reasonable progress

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.5

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion