Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

University of Northampton

Inspected 26 Feb 2020 · published 5 May 2020 · URN 133857

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Jai Sharda

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    26 Feb 2020

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Jai Sharda

  • Postcode verified

    NN1 5PH

  • Name on report verified

    University of Northampton

  • URN verified

    133857

Page 1 of 5
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+40Positivemore positive than 45% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisehigh-qualityeffectivelyeffectivehigh expectationsvery highmake good progressclearsuccessfully
Criticismconcernsweaknessesfall behindunclearbelow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
5
Words of findings
1,196
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 30, typical 45
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
1
typical 5
Hedged sentences
6%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

University of Northampton Monitoring visit report

p.1

Name of lead inspector: Jai Sharda, Ofsted Inspector

p.1

Type of provider: Higher education institution

p.1

Address: University of Northampton Waterside Campus University Drive Northampton NN1 5PH Monitoring visit: University of Northampton 25-26 February 2020

p.1

Context and focus of visit

From October 2018, Ofsted undertook to carry out monitoring visits to all newly directly funded providers of apprenticeship training provision which began to be funded from April 2017 or after by the Education and Skills Funding Agency and/or the apprenticeship levy. This monitoring visit was undertaken as part of those arrangements and as outlined in the ‘Further education and skills inspection handbook’, especially the sections entitled ‘Monitoring visits’ and ‘Monitoring visits to providers that are newly directly publicly funded’. The focus of these visits is on the themes set out below.

p.2

Context and focus of visit

The University of Northampton is a public university based in Northampton. It was formed in 1999 by the amalgamation of a number of training colleges and gained full university status in 2005. It gained a government-funded contract to deliver higher- level apprenticeships in May 2018. In June 2018, the first group of apprentices began the nursing associate standards-based level 5 programme. At the time of the monitoring visit, 65 apprentices work at hospitals and medical centres in Northampton and Kettering. Staff based in the university’s faculty of health, education and society deliver the programme.

p.2

Reasonable progress

Leaders have a clear rationale for delivering the nursing associate apprenticeship training programme. This level 5 programme is responsive to regional and national staff shortages in high-quality nursing care in the public and the private sectors. Leaders have very high aspirations for their apprentices. The programme represents a significant stepping stone towards a career in nursing for mature entrants to the profession. Most of these have not participated in formal education since they left school. Leaders have a good understanding of the needs of healthcare employers and they provide a flexible curriculum to meet their needs. Employers are closely involved in the design and delivery of the curriculum. They provide apprentices with opportunities to participate in a wide range of nursing associate care specialisms that prepare apprentices well for their next steps. Leaders employ well-qualified lecturers who have significant vocational experience

p.2

Reasonable progress

and knowledge of up-to-date nursing and subjects allied to medical professions. Monitoring visit: University of Northampton 25-26 February 2020 Many hold postgraduate qualifications and all have an appropriate specialist qualification in teaching in the nursing sector. Leaders implement an effective recruitment process to ensure that applicants can study successfully at higher apprenticeship level. University staff and employers discuss with potential apprentices the demands of a career in nursing. This ensures that apprentices receive a good preparation for study and work at this level. Leaders have a suitably clear grasp of the provision’s strengths and weaknesses. However, they do not have a formal or comprehensive process for self-assessing the overall quality of provision. They do not have a system for identifying, setting and monitoring challenging targets for the apprenticeship programme. Leaders have implemented several initiatives to improve the provision. These include

p.2

Reasonable progress

the purchase of software to help managers monitor and record apprentices’ progress more effectively and a review of the procedures for apprentice recruitment. However, leaders rightly acknowledge that it is too soon to judge the impact of these measures.

p.3

Reasonable progress

Lecturers have high expectations of apprentices, most of whom were previously employed as healthcare assistants with few opportunities for career progression. They identify apprentices’ starting points accurately. They use this information effectively to plan training so that apprentices make good progress in developing new knowledge, skills and behaviours. Lecturers provide apprentices with their entitlement to high-quality off-the-job training which supports their learning. Apprentices enjoy learning new skills such as taking blood samples and using an ECG monitor. They attend high-quality university lectures and learn how to use state-of-the-art virtual reality simulation equipment to practise their nursing skills. Lecturers know their apprentices well and monitor their progress effectively. They meet each apprentice frequently to set targets and review progress. Employers support apprentices well and participate in meetings with lecturers and apprentices

p.3

Reasonable progress

to discuss progress and to deal with any concerns. Lecturers, supported by employers, provide additional support to apprentices when they fall behind. Lecturers ensure that apprentices develop their mathematical skills through well- delivered topics on the application of mathematics to essential nursing skills. These include calculating volumes, weights and ratios when dealing with patients’ medications. Apprentices receive good support to improve their skills in English, including their use of academic referencing and research. Monitoring visit: University of Northampton 25-26 February 2020 Apprentices receive good-quality feedback on their written assignments. In a few cases though, lecturers do not check whether apprentices learn from the feedback given for previous assignments. As a result, a few apprentices do not improve their work sufficiently rapidly. Apprentices do not have a sufficiently detailed understanding of their end-point

p.3

Reasonable progress

assessment methodology. They are often confused about the difference between the assessment methods used in their foundation degree and those in their apprenticeship end-point assessment process. Apprentices are unaware that they can achieve merit and distinction grades and consequently are unclear about how they can work towards achieving the highest grades.

p.4

Reasonable progress

Leaders implement suitable safeguarding and ‘Prevent’ duty procedures to keep apprentices safe. They make sure that the recruitment of new staff is suitable and meets safeguarding requirements.

p.4

Reasonable progress

Apprentices receive safeguarding and ‘Prevent’ duty training at induction. They apply this understanding well to their job roles as apprentice nursing associates. Apprentices have a particularly good understanding of how to ensure the safety and welfare of patients in their care. They understand British values and the terms associated with the ‘Prevent’ duty, including the risks posed by extremist ideologies, and articulate the main concepts well.

p.4

Reasonable progress

Leaders ensure that the designated safeguarding lead has appropriate training and knowledge to be effective. Apprentices know how and to whom they should report any safeguarding concerns, including when online when at work. However, few apprentices are aware that they can also report any concerns to the university’s designated safeguarding lead for apprentices. Monitoring visit: University of Northampton 25-26 February 2020 regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding

p.4

Reasonable progress

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.5

Reasonable progress

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.5

Reasonable progress

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.5

Reasonable progress

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.5

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion