Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)
Shireland Biomedical Utc
Summary
Niall Gallagher (lead), Huw Bishop, Victor Reid
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
26 Feb 2020
- Inspectors verified
Huw Bishop, Niall Gallagher, Victor Reid
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Requires improvement
- Leadership and management verified
Requires improvement
- Overall effectiveness verified
Requires improvement
- Personal development verified
Requires improvement
- Quality of education verified
Requires improvement
- Postcode verified
B70 8DJ
- Name on report verified
Health Futures UTC
- URN verified
141813
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2018.
- OverallRequires improvement
- Behaviour and attitudesRequires improvement
- Leadership and managementRequires improvement
- Personal developmentRequires improvement
- Quality of educationRequires improvement
15% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Requires improvement (5,043 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Requires improvement.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Staff know the signs that may suggest a student is at risk of harm, and they know what to do if they are concerned. p.3
- Teachers do not always use assessment to check how well students have understood their work or to identify gaps in their knowledge. p.2
- Furthermore, there are still too many students who are persistently absent from school. p.4
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- However, lower-attaining students are not achieving as well as they should. p.3
- Lower-attaining students are not doing as well as they should. p.4
- Consequently, there may be students with SEND who are not doing as well as they should because their needs are not known. p.4
- Leaders know what needs to be done and have plans in place to improve this system. p.3
- Leaders should ensure that lower-attaining students receive the support that they need. p.4
- Leaders should ensure that all students have appropriate PSHE education, as well as opportunities to learn about different faiths and cultures. p.4
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 8
- Words of findings
- 1,364
- about usual (typical 1215)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 58, typical 56
- Average sentence
- 14 words
- Next steps
- 6
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 16%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of Health Futures UTC High Street, West Bromwich, West Midlands B70 8DJ
p.1
Overall effectiveness Requires improvement
The quality of education Requires improvement Behaviour and attitudes Requires improvement Personal development Requires improvement Leadership and management Requires improvement Sixth-form provision Requires improvement Previous inspection grade Inadequate 25–26 February 2020
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Until recently, it was not clear that Health Futures UTC had a health focus. That has changed. Students attending the school are now in no doubt that the school’s aim is to provide a career pathway into health-related industries. The reception area is flanked by mannequins dressed as paramedics and surgeons and banners promoting the care values of empowerment, confidentiality, dignity, safeguarding, respect, communication and anti-discrimination. All students in Years 10 and 11 now study for a qualification in health and social care.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Staff have higher expectations of students than they had previously. Students look smart in their uniforms. However, too many do not attend school regularly and are late. Students are compliant in lessons and act sensibly when they walk around the school. Yet, some do not have positive attitudes towards learning, and not all are happy in school. This has not been helped by the high number of staff who have left the school recently. Although the number of staff leaving has reduced, pupils told us that they did not like having so many supply teachers.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Some students who responded to the pupil survey reported incidents of bullying. But students are confident that this is picked up quickly and dealt with by staff.
p.2
better?
Since the previous inspection, leaders have made it a priority to make sure that the school has a health and science focus. The curriculum is now more appropriate, with a range of health- and science-related courses. In key stage 4, all students study a core of English, mathematics, science and health and social care. English and health and social care are relative strengths. The curriculum in these subjects is sequenced in a logical way. This ensures that students build their knowledge over time. Teachers make sensible decisions about the order in which they teach topics. For example, in English literature, students develop their analytical skills when studying ‘A Christmas Carol’. They then sharpen these skills when studying more complex literature, such as ‘Romeo and Juliet’. The curriculum is not as well sequenced elsewhere. In some subjects, including science and psychology, topics jump around
p.2
better?
Assessment is not used consistently well. Typically, teachers assess students against the criteria set out by examination boards. This is true for students in key stage 4 and those in the sixth form. Teachers do not always use assessment to check how well students have understood their work or to identify gaps in their knowledge. Consequently, misconceptions are not always corrected. Because teachers are focused on preparing students for examinations, some students have a superficial understanding of their work. We spoke to students in science who were able to answer questions by recounting facts but were unable to apply their learning to different contexts. 25–26 February 2020
p.2
3
Since the previous inspection, leaders have focused on helping the highest-attaining students and disadvantaged students. They have had some success. These groups of students are now achieving better than they were. However, lower-attaining students are not achieving as well as they should. Some told us that they were not given the support they need and felt they were not treated as well as their peers.
p.3
3
Students with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) are supported well. However, there is room for this to be even better. Currently, the system for identifying students with SEND is at an early stage of development. Leaders know what needs to be done and have plans in place to improve this system.
p.3
3
Students receive appropriate careers information, advice and guidance. Partners from within the health industry provide support and work experience opportunities. All the students we spoke to were positive about their health-related work experience. When students leave the sixth form, most move on to appropriate university courses. We did notice, however, that very few moved into apprenticeships.
p.3
3
Provision for students’ wider development is not yet good enough. Students do not have many opportunities to take part in extra-curricular activities, and there are limited opportunities for them to learn about different faiths and cultures. Some students currently miss part of their personal, social, health and economic (PSHE) education lessons. This is because they are taken out for extra English. Leaders are addressing this.
p.3
3
Students told us that behaviour has improved since the last inspection. We noted students behaving appropriately around the school, and most were compliant in lessons. However, some students do not show a strong desire to learn. Although attendance is improving, there are still too many students who are frequently absent from school. This is having a negative impact on their learning.
p.3
3
The governing body is committed to improving the school. Governors have lots of experience of health-related industries. They have developed a good relationship with representatives from the WMG Academy Multi-Academy Trust. The trust is providing helpful support to the school.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.
p.3
Safeguarding
Leaders have ensured that there are clear procedures in place to keep students safe. Leaders carry out the necessary checks on new staff before they are appointed in order to ensure that they are suitable to work with students. Leaders provide all staff with safeguarding training as soon as they start, and this is refreshed regularly. Staff know the signs that may suggest a student is at risk of harm, and they know what to do if they are concerned. Leaders maintain thorough safeguarding records and work well with outside agencies. They ensure that students who need help get it quickly. 25–26 February 2020
p.3
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
Lessons are not sequenced consistently well in all subjects. For example, in science and psychology, topics are not taught in an order that allows students to build their knowledge and develop their skills incrementally. Leaders and teachers should ensure that lessons are sequenced consistently well in all subjects. Assessment is not used consistently well. Assessment is frequently used to check how well students are prepared for examinations rather than to check how well they have understood their work. Leaders and teachers should ensure that assessment is used to check how well students have understood their work and how well they can apply their knowledge. Lower-attaining students are not doing as well as they should. They do not always get the support that they need. Leaders should ensure that lower-attaining students receive the support that they need. Some students in Year 11 do not have enough PSHE education. This is because
p.4
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
they are taken out of part of their PSHE education lessons for extra English. Moreover, there are limited opportunities for students to learn about different faiths and cultures. Leaders should ensure that all students have appropriate PSHE education, as well as opportunities to learn about different faiths and cultures. Attendance has been lower than the national average for the past two years. Although there are some signs that it is improving, it is improving very slowly. Furthermore, there are still too many students who are persistently absent from school. This means that students are missing out on learning. Leaders should review their strategies to ensure that they are as effective as they can be to improve students’ attendance. Leaders’ system for identifying students with SEND is not fully developed. Consequently, there may be students with SEND who are not doing as well as they should because their needs are not known. Leaders should ensure that the
p.4
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
system for identifying students with SEND is improved further so that all students with SEND receive the support that they need.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use Ofsted Parent View information when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school. 25–26 February 2020
p.4
5
If you are the school and you are not happy with the inspection or the report, you can complain to Ofsted .
p.5
Further information
You can search for published performance information about the school.
p.5
Further information
In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 25–26 February 2020
p.5
School details
Inspection number 10135617 Type of school Technical
p.6
School details
School category University technical college
p.6
sixth form
Principal Ruth Umerah (interim principal)
p.6
sixth form
Date of previous inspection 5–6 February 2019, under section 8 of the Education Act 2005
p.6
Information about this school
Health Futures UTC is a university technical college with a focus on health and social sciences. There are a small number of students accessing alternative provision at Ascend health and childcare, Dartmouth House and Flexible Learning. The school is currently being supported by the WMG Academy for Young Engineers multi-academy trust. This support was brokered by the Department for Education (DfE) following the school’s most recent section 5 inspection in May 2018. 25–26 February 2020
p.6
Information about this inspection
We carried out this inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.7
Information about this inspection
In accordance with section 13(4) of the Education Act 2005, Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector is of the opinion that the school no longer requires special measures.
p.7
Information about this inspection
We met with the interim principal and assistant principals. We also met with a range of staff, including curriculum leaders, teachers and teaching assistants. We met with members of the governing body and a representative from WMG Academy for Young Engineers multi-academy trust. We focused on English, science, psychology and health and social care during the inspection. We considered the school’s curriculum plans, visited lessons and scrutinised students’ work, as well as discussing with students how well they learn these subjects. We reviewed a range of documentation, including leaders’ plans to improve the school, records of meetings of the board of trustees and the school’s attendance and behaviour records. When inspecting safeguarding, we looked at the school’s procedures for recruiting staff. We also considered the quality of staff training and the procedures that are in place to keep students safe.
p.7
Inspection team
Niall Gallagher, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector
p.7
Inspection team
Victor Reid Her Majesty’s Inspector 25–26 February 2020
p.7
8
regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.8
8
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.8
8
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.8
8
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.8
8
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.8
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion